These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2913454)

  • 1. Selectional processes in causality judgment.
    Shanks DR
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 2913454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accounting for occurrences: a new view of the use of contingency information in causal judgment.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):204-18. PubMed ID: 18194063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of a stimulus filling an action-outcome delay in human judgments of causal effectiveness.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1999 Jan; 25(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 9987860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrasting cue-density effects in causal and prediction judgments.
    Vadillo MA; Musca SC; Blanco F; Matute H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 21327350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cue interaction and judgments of causality: contributions of causal and associative processes.
    Tangen JM; Allan LG
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 15078048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human causality judgments and response rates on DRL and DRH schedules of reinforcement.
    Reed P
    Learn Behav; 2003 May; 31(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 12882379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Causal judgment from contingency information: relation between subjective reports and individual tendencies in judgment.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Apr; 28(3):415-26. PubMed ID: 10881559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of causal information on judgments of treatment efficacy.
    Yopchick JE; Kim NS
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jan; 37(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 19103973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Instrumental judgment and performance under variations in action-outcome contingency and contiguity.
    Shanks DR; Dickinson A
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Jul; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 1895945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Justification effects on the judgment of analogy.
    Sieck WR; Quinn CN; Schooler JW
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Sep; 27(5):844-55. PubMed ID: 10540813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accounting for occurrences: an explanation for some novel tendencies in causal judgment from contingency information.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jun; 37(4):500-13. PubMed ID: 19460956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal contiguity and contingency judgments: a Pavlovian analogue.
    Allan LG; Tangen JM; Wood R; Shah T
    Integr Physiol Behav Sci; 2003; 38(3):214-29. PubMed ID: 15070084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Causal judgments about relations between multilevel variables.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):499-513. PubMed ID: 11294446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Driven by power? Probe question and presentation format effects on causal judgment.
    Perales JC; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1482-94. PubMed ID: 18980409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Primacy in causal strength judgments: the effect of initial evidence for generative versus inhibitory relationships.
    Dennis MJ; Ahn WK
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Jan; 29(1):152-64. PubMed ID: 11277458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recursive retrospective revaluation of causal judgments.
    Macho S; Burkart J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1171-86. PubMed ID: 12450340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inference-based retrospective revaluation in human causal judgments requires knowledge of within-compound relationships.
    Mitchell CJ; Killedar A; Lovibond PF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):418-24. PubMed ID: 16248728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: sadder but wiser?
    Alloy LB; Abramson LY
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Dec; 108(4):441-85. PubMed ID: 528910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of parity, physical size, and magnitude in numerical cognition: the SNARC effect revisited.
    Fitousi D; Shaki S; Algom D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):143-55. PubMed ID: 19304604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metacognitive judgments-of-learning in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder.
    Wojcik DZ; Waterman AH; Lestié C; Moulin CJ; Souchay C
    Autism; 2014 May; 18(4):393-408. PubMed ID: 24151127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.