These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2913456)

  • 1. Detection of intraword and interword letter repetition: a test of the word unitization hypothesis.
    Krueger LE
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 2913456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On non-adjacent letter repetition and orthographic processing: Lexical decisions to nonwords created by repeating or inserting letters in words.
    Kerr E; Mirault J; Grainger J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Apr; 28(2):596-609. PubMed ID: 33236286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of letter repetition in words and nonwords: the effect of opposite-case distractors.
    Krueger LE; Stadtlander LM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Nov; 17(4):942-50. PubMed ID: 1837305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Letter detection with rapid serial visual presentation: evidence against word superiority at feature extraction.
    Krueger LE; Shapiro RG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Nov; 5(4):657-673. PubMed ID: 528966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integrating information across eye fixations in reading: the role of letter and word units.
    Inhoff AW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Apr; 73(3):281-97. PubMed ID: 2353591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On time differences in searching for letters in words and nonwords: do they emerge during the initial encoding or the subsequent scan?
    Johnson NF; Carnot MJ
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 2314225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The word-superiority effect and phonological recoding.
    Krueger LE
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):685-94. PubMed ID: 1435271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal separation of two part-letter arrays and size changes in a nonmasking work-superiority effect.
    Solman RT
    Perception; 1987; 16(5):655-69. PubMed ID: 3451193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the flexibility of letter position coding during lexical processing: evidence from eye movements when reading Thai.
    Winskel H; Perea M; Ratitamkul T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(8):1522-36. PubMed ID: 22502779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating the boundaries of reading units: letter detection in misspelled words.
    Healy AF; Drewnowski A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Jun; 9(3):413-26. PubMed ID: 6223980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of intraword and interword spacing on eye movements during reading: exploring the optimal use of space in a line of text.
    Slattery TJ; Rayner K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1275-92. PubMed ID: 23709061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification of letters in the predesignated target paradigm: a word superiority effect for the common word the.
    Peterzell DH; Sinclair GP; Healy AF; Bourne LE
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(3):299-315. PubMed ID: 2221192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of syntactic structure on letter detection in adjacent function words.
    Greenberg SN; Koriat A; Shapiro A
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):663-70. PubMed ID: 1435269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recognition of letters in words and nonwords.
    Allegretti CL; Puglisi JT
    J Gen Psychol; 1982 Jul; 107(1st Half):139-48. PubMed ID: 7119756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The PIG in sPrInG: evidence on letter grouping from the reading of buried words.
    Humphreys GW; Mayall K; Cooper AC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Dec; 10(4):939-46. PubMed ID: 15000542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repetition blindness for words yet repetition advantage for nonwords.
    Coltheart V; Langdon R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Mar; 29(2):171-85. PubMed ID: 12696808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the role of word frequency in the detection of component letters.
    Johnson NF; Allen PA; Strand TL
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):474-82. PubMed ID: 2761405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transposed-letter priming effects in reading aloud words and nonwords.
    Mousikou P; Kinoshita S; Wu S; Norris D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1437-42. PubMed ID: 25665798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The word-superiority effect does not require a T-scope.
    Prinzmetal W
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 May; 51(5):473-84. PubMed ID: 1594437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reading units that include interword spaces: filling spaces around a letter can facilitate letter detection.
    Healy AF; Cunningham TF
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jun; 32(4):560-9. PubMed ID: 15478750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.