These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29135693)

  • 1. Improving the Reproducibility and Quality of Reporting for Animal Studies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
    Arseneau KKO; Cominelli F
    Inflamm Bowel Dis; 2017 Dec; 23(12):2069-2071. PubMed ID: 29135693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On stratification, minimization and protection against types 1 and 2 error.
    Bracken MB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 54(1):104-5. PubMed ID: 11246516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials.
    Walker A; Nixon J
    J Wound Care; 2004 Mar; 13(3):103-6. PubMed ID: 15045804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research.
    Kilkenny C; Browne WJ; Cuthi I; Emerson M; Altman DG
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2012 Mar; 41(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 22390425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research.
    Kilkenny C; Browne WJ; Cuthill IC; Emerson M; Altman DG
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2012 Apr; 20(4):256-60. PubMed ID: 22424462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A call for the reporting of effect sizes in research reports to enhance critical appraisal and evidence-based practice.
    Mays MZ; Melnyk BM
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2009; 6(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 19744052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality of methods reporting in animal models of colitis.
    Bramhall M; Flórez-Vargas O; Stevens R; Brass A; Cruickshank S
    Inflamm Bowel Dis; 2015 Jun; 21(6):1248-59. PubMed ID: 25989337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A guide to research methodology.
    Lewis PA; Nelson EA
    J Wound Care; 1998 Jul; 7(7):361-2. PubMed ID: 9791368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The precision of reliability and validity estimates re-visited: distinguishing between clinical and statistical significance of sample size requirements.
    Cicchetti DV
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2001 Oct; 23(5):695-700. PubMed ID: 11778646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical significance and p-values: guidelines for use and reporting.
    Parsons N; Carey-Smith R; Dritsaki M; Griffin X; Metcalfe D; Perry D; Stengel D; Costa M
    Bone Joint J; 2019 Oct; 101-B(10):1179-1183. PubMed ID: 31564151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thinking both inside and outside the box on measurement articles.
    Froman RD; Schmitt MH
    Res Nurs Health; 2003 Oct; 26(5):335-6. PubMed ID: 14579254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reproducibility Issues: Avoiding Pitfalls in Animal Inflammation Models.
    Laman JD; Kooistra SM; Clausen BE
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1559():1-17. PubMed ID: 28063033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Over-AVID subgroup analysis.
    Goldberger JJ; Parker MA; Kadish AH
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2001 Nov; 38(5):1586-7. PubMed ID: 11691549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodological reporting behavior, sample sizes, and statistical power in studies of event-related potentials: Barriers to reproducibility and replicability.
    Clayson PE; Carbine KA; Baldwin SA; Larson MJ
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Nov; 56(11):e13437. PubMed ID: 31322285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Overview of Genome-Wide Association Studies.
    Chang M; He L; Cai L
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1754():97-108. PubMed ID: 29536439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "Damn the precision, full speed ahead with the clinical interpretation.".
    Charter RA
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2001 Oct; 23(5):692-4. PubMed ID: 11778645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluation of diagnostic methods].
    Doyon F; Hill C
    J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 82(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 11428206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding research: 2. Ensuring reliability and validity.
    Baxter H
    J Wound Care; 2001 Sep; 10(8):329-31. PubMed ID: 12964336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Challenging the validity of conclusions based on P-values alone: a critique of contemporary clinical research design and methods.
    Ebramzadeh E; McKellop H; Dorey F; Sarmiento A
    Instr Course Lect; 1994; 43():587-600. PubMed ID: 9097190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A research primer, Part 2: Guidelines for developing a research project.
    Yens DP; Brannan GD; Dumsha JZ
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2014 Jan; 114(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 24384972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.