These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29135693)
21. Novel endpoints and design of early clinical trials. Parulekar WR; Eisenhauer EA Ann Oncol; 2002; 13 Suppl 4():139-43. PubMed ID: 12401680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Guidelines for reporting of statistics in European Urology. Vickers AJ; Sjoberg DD; Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 25037638 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Reliability and validity in research. Roberts P; Priest H Nurs Stand; 2006 Jul 12-18; 20(44):41-5. PubMed ID: 16872117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Statistical significance, power and sample size - what does it all mean? Christley RM J Small Anim Pract; 2008 Jun; 49(6):263. PubMed ID: 18510495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. SQUIRE Guidelines for reporting improvement studies in healthcare: implications for nursing publications. Oermann MH J Nurs Care Qual; 2009; 24(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 19287244 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Methodological advances and plans for improving regulatory success for confirmatory studies. Koch GG; Davis SM; Anderson RL Stat Med; 1998 Aug 15-30; 17(15-16):1675-90. PubMed ID: 9749439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Rudiments of subgroup analyses. Moyé LA Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2012; 54(4):338-42. PubMed ID: 22226001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Statistical shortcomings in licensing applications. Lewis JA; Facey KM Stat Med; 1998 Aug 15-30; 17(15-16):1663-73. PubMed ID: 9749438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Statistical extensions of Ponterotto and Ruckdeschel's (2007) reliability matrix for estimating the adequacy of internal consistency coefficients. Ponterotto JG; Charter RA Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Jun; 108(3):878-86. PubMed ID: 19725323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. UK funders demand strong statistics for animal studies. Cressey D Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7547):271-2. PubMed ID: 25877180 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Are we satisfied with the way we review an article? Aslam M; Burris HH; Zupancic JA Adv Neonatal Care; 2009 Feb; 9(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 19212165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Animal research: reporting in vivo experiments: the ARRIVE guidelines. NC3Rs Reporting Guidelines Working Group Exp Physiol; 2010 Aug; 95(8):842-4. PubMed ID: 20610776 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Animal research: reporting in vivo experiments: the ARRIVE guidelines. Kilkenny C; Browne W; Cuthill IC; Emerson M; Altman DG; J Gene Med; 2010 Jul; 12(7):561-3. PubMed ID: 20607692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Yes, size does matter!: Sample size calculations for randomised trials. Middleton L BJOG; 2020 Jul; 127(8):1016-1017. PubMed ID: 31910329 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The ethics of sample size: two-sided testing and one-sided thinking. Knottnerus JA; Bouter LM J Clin Epidemiol; 2001 Feb; 54(2):109-10. PubMed ID: 11166523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Another comment on the role of statistical methods. Cox DR Phys Ther; 2001 Aug; 81(8):1469. PubMed ID: 11512546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]