These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2913571)

  • 1. Instructional and probability manipulations of bias in multiletter matching.
    Proctor RW; Weeks DJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jan; 45(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 2913571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Same-different judgments of multiletter strings: insensitivity to positional bias and spacing.
    Proctor RW; Healy AF; Van Zandt T
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Jan; 49(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 2011454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An examination of response bias in multiletter matching.
    Proctor RW; Rao KV; Hurst PW
    Percept Psychophys; 1984 May; 35(5):464-76. PubMed ID: 6462873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data.
    Ratcliff R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):278-91. PubMed ID: 12120790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the "misguided" use of reaction-time differences: a discussion of Ratcliff and Hacker (1981).
    Proctor RW; Rao KV
    Percept Psychophys; 1982 Jun; 31(6):601-4. PubMed ID: 7122199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of two response time models applied to perceptual matching.
    Van Zandt T; Colonius H; Proctor RW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Jun; 7(2):208-56. PubMed ID: 10909132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regularity, exposure time and perception of numerosity.
    Alam S; Luccio R; Vardabasso F
    Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Oct; 63(2 Pt 2):883-8. PubMed ID: 3808870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A random-walk model of accuracy and reaction time applied to three experiments on pigeon visual discrimination.
    Blough DS
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Apr; 37(2):133-50. PubMed ID: 21517198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interpreting the parameters of the diffusion model: an empirical validation.
    Voss A; Rothermund K; Voss J
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Oct; 32(7):1206-20. PubMed ID: 15813501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pointing, looking at, and pressing keys: A diffusion model account of response modality.
    Gomez P; Ratcliff R; Childers R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1515-23. PubMed ID: 26322685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Signal detection theory and probability matching apply to vigilance.
    Craig A
    Hum Factors; 1987 Dec; 29(6):645-52. PubMed ID: 3436621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Task-invariant aspects of goodness in perceptual representation.
    Lachmann T; van Leeuwen C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Oct; 58(7):1295-310. PubMed ID: 16194959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of category identity on letter matching: conceptual penetration of visual processing or response competition?
    Chen J; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 May; 74(4):716-29. PubMed ID: 22231606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Separating response-execution bias from decision bias: arguments for an additional parameter in Ratcliff's diffusion model.
    Voss A; Voss J; Klauer KC
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):539-55. PubMed ID: 20030967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Instructional control of generalized relational matching to sample in children.
    Lowenkron B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Nov; 52(3):293-309. PubMed ID: 2584916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Task-specific serial position effects in comparisons of multiletter strings.
    Proctor RW; Healy AF
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 Aug; 42(2):180-94. PubMed ID: 3627939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stimulus encoding by mentally retarded and nonretarded adults.
    Caruso DR; Detterman DK
    Am J Ment Defic; 1983 May; 87(6):649-55. PubMed ID: 6869423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Equivalence classes generated by sequence training.
    Sigurdardottir ZG; Green G; Saunders RR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Jan; 53(1):47-63. PubMed ID: 2299290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unsupervised visual discrimination learning of complex stimuli: Accuracy, bias and generalization.
    Montefusco-Siegmund R; Toro M; Maldonado PE; Aylwin ML
    Vision Res; 2018 Jul; 148():37-48. PubMed ID: 29775623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of speed vs accuracy instructions and field dependence on college students' digit-symbol matching performance.
    Wong JL; Gilpin AR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Aug; 73(1):314. PubMed ID: 1945711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.