142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29135722)
1. Assessment of biological and clinical aggressiveness of invasive ductal breast cancer using baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT-derived volumetric parameters.
Ege Aktas G; Taştekin E; Sarikaya A
Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Jan; 39(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 29135722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Association between semiquantitative PET parameters and molecular subtypes of breast invasive ductal carcinoma.
Chiacchio S; Evangelista L; Alsharif A; Manca G; DI Martino F; Negri A; Tredici M; Cervino AR; Puccini G; Filidei E; Ghilli M; Naccarato AG; Roncella M; Volterrani D
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Mar; 62(1):101-111. PubMed ID: 26329496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The correlation of
Qu YH; Long N; Ran C; Sun J
Clin Transl Oncol; 2021 Mar; 23(3):620-627. PubMed ID: 32683540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do clinical, histological or immunohistochemical primary tumour characteristics translate into different (18)F-FDG PET/CT volumetric and heterogeneity features in stage II/III breast cancer?
Groheux D; Majdoub M; Tixier F; Le Rest CC; Martineau A; Merlet P; Espié M; de Roquancourt A; Hindié E; Hatt M; Visvikis D
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Oct; 42(11):1682-1691. PubMed ID: 26140849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterization.
Basu S; Chen W; Tchou J; Mavi A; Cermik T; Czerniecki B; Schnall M; Alavi A
Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(5):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18098228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Metabolic Tumor Burden Assessed by Dual Time Point [
Garcia-Vicente AM; Pérez-Beteta J; Pérez-García VM; Molina D; Jiménez-Londoño GA; Soriano-Castrejón A; Martínez-González A
Mol Imaging Biol; 2017 Aug; 19(4):636-644. PubMed ID: 27981471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7.
Groheux D; Martineau A; Teixeira L; Espié M; de Cremoux P; Bertheau P; Merlet P; Lemarignier C
Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 28057031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation of the value of 18F-FDG uptake, described by SUVmax, SUVavg, metabolic tumour volume and total lesion glycolysis, to clinicopathological prognostic factors and biological subtypes in breast cancer.
Kajáry K; Tőkés T; Dank M; Kulka J; Szakáll S; Lengyel Z
Nucl Med Commun; 2015 Jan; 36(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 25299471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The relationship between (18)F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters and clinicopathological features of breast cancer].
Tang B; Zhang Y; Zhou J; Xu Y; Li TR; Ding CY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 39(4):280-285. PubMed ID: 28550668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of
Jena A; Taneja S; Singh A; Negi P; Sarin R; Das PK; Singhal M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):662-670. PubMed ID: 28678576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic Value of Percentage Change in Metabolic Parameters as Measured by Dual-Time Point
Yoo J; Yoon HJ; Kim BS
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2017 Oct; 26(10):1131-1137. PubMed ID: 28498790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Whole-Body Metabolic Tumor Volume, as Determined by (18)F-FDG PET/CT, as a Prognostic Factor of Outcome for Patients With Breast Cancer Who Have Distant Metastasis.
Son SH; Lee SW; Jeong SY; Song BI; Chae YS; Ahn BC; Lee J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Oct; 205(4):878-85. PubMed ID: 26204115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Associations between the standardized uptake value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and the prognostic factors of invasive lobular carcinoma: in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma.
Jung NY; Kim SH; Choi BB; Kim SH; Sung MS
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 13():113. PubMed ID: 25889560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic significance of preoperative
Higuchi T; Nishimukai A; Ozawa H; Fujimoto Y; Yanai A; Miyagawa Y; Murase K; Imamura M; Takatsuka Y; Kitajima K; Fukushima K; Miyoshi Y
Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():5-12. PubMed ID: 27569020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation between semiquantitative and volumetric 18F-FDG PET/computed tomography parameters and Ki-67 expression in breast cancer.
Mohamadien NRA; Sayed MHM
Nucl Med Commun; 2021 Jun; 42(6):656-664. PubMed ID: 33560720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Association of
Önner H; Coskun N; Erol M; Eren Karanis Mİ
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2022; 41(1):11-16. PubMed ID: 34991831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Alternative volumetric PET pjmirometers for evaluation of breast cancer cases with 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging: Metabolic tumour volume and total lesion glycolysis.
Arslan E; Can Trabulus D; Mermut Ö; Şavlı TC; Çermik TF
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2021 Feb; 65(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 33084216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of breast cancer recurrence using lymph node metabolic and volumetric parameters from
Kim YI; Kim YJ; Paeng JC; Cheon GJ; Lee DS; Chung JK; Kang KW
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Oct; 44(11):1787-1795. PubMed ID: 28616695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Association between partial-volume corrected SUVmax and Oncotype DX recurrence score in early-stage, ER-positive/HER2-negative invasive breast cancer.
Lee SH; Ha S; An HJ; Lee JS; Han W; Im SA; Ryu HS; Kim WH; Chang JM; Cho N; Moon WK; Cheon GJ
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Aug; 43(9):1574-84. PubMed ID: 27209424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The maximum standardized uptake value of metastatic site in 18 F-FDG PET/CT predicts molecular subtypes and survival in metastatic breast cancer: An Izmir Oncology Group study.
Cokmert S; Tanriverdi O; Karapolat I; Demir L; Bayoglu V; Can A; Akyol M; Yilmaz Y; Oktay Tarhan M
J BUON; 2016; 21(6):1410-1418. PubMed ID: 28039701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
