278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29135737)
1. Effect of Long-Term Use of Facemask With Miniplate on Maxillary Protraction in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.
On SW; Baek SH; Choi JY
J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 29(2):309-314. PubMed ID: 29135737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the effects of maxillary protraction using facemask and miniplate anchorage between unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients.
Ahn HW; Kim KW; Yang IH; Choi JY; Baek SH
Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):935-41. PubMed ID: 22380632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dentoskeletal effects of facemask therapy in skeletal Class III cleft patients with or without bone graft.
Zhang Y; Jia H; Fu Z; Huang Y; Wang Z; Guo R; Shen J; Li W
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):542-549. PubMed ID: 29602346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The short-term treatment effects of face mask therapy in Class III patients based on the anchorage device: miniplates vs rapid maxillary expansion.
Lee NK; Yang IH; Baek SH
Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):846-52. PubMed ID: 22264134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Skeletal response to maxillary protraction in patients with cleft lip and palate before age 10 years.
Tindlund RS
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1994 Jul; 31(4):295-308. PubMed ID: 7918525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maxillary protraction in patients with cleft lip and palate in mixed dentition: cephalometric evaluation after completion of growth.
Susami T; Okayasu M; Inokuchi T; Ohkubo K; Uchino N; Uwatoko K; Takahashi-Ichikawa N; Nagahama K; Takato T
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2014 Sep; 51(5):514-24. PubMed ID: 24010865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New treatment modality for maxillary hypoplasia in cleft patients. Protraction facemask with miniplate anchorage.
Baek SH; Kim KW; Choi JY
Angle Orthod; 2010 Jul; 80(4):783-91. PubMed ID: 20482368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of cleft type, facemask anchorage method, and alveolar bone graft on maxillary protraction: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Yang IH; Chang YI; Kim TW; Ahn SJ; Lim WH; Lee NK; Baek SH
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2012 Mar; 49(2):221-9. PubMed ID: 21740169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of maxillary protraction with alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction vs expansion alone in maxillary retrusive patients: a single-center, randomized controlled trial.
Liu W; Zhou Y; Wang X; Liu D; Zhou S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Oct; 148(4):641-51. PubMed ID: 26432320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Face mask therapy of preadolescents with unilateral cleft lip and palate.
Buschang PH; Porter C; Genecov E; Genecov D; Sayler KE
Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 8010523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maxillary Protraction Therapy in Class III Patients With and Without Cleft Lip and Palate: An Interim Report of a Prospective Comparative Study.
Lin Y; Fu Z; Guo R; Ma L; Li W
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2021 Apr; 58(4):429-437. PubMed ID: 32985240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting on the Maxillary Growth: Unilateral Versus Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients.
Seo J; Kim S; Yang IH; Baek SH
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 26(7):2128-32. PubMed ID: 26468796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maxillary expansion and protraction in correction of midface retrusion in a complete unilateral cleft lip and palate patient.
Kawakami M; Yagi T; Takada K
Angle Orthod; 2002 Aug; 72(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 12169036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term stability of maxillary protraction therapy in Class III patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.
Zhang Y; Fu Z; Jia H; Huang Y; Li X; Liu H; Li W
Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):214-220. PubMed ID: 30484325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.
Ngan P; Wilmes B; Drescher D; Martin C; Weaver B; Gunel E
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative assessment of facemask therapy with and without skeletal anchorage in growing Class III patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP): A single-center, prospective randomized clinical trial.
Dutta S; Batra P; Raghavan S; Sharma K; Talwar A; Arora A; Srivastava A
Spec Care Dentist; 2024; 44(2):491-501. PubMed ID: 37084175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The study of maxillary protraction face mask combined with orthodontics for complete unilateral cleft lip and palate patients].
Zhang H; Fang B; Zhu M
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Jun; 14(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 15995762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Soft-tissue profile changes during widening and protraction of the maxilla in patients with cleft lip and palate compared with normal growth and development.
Tindlund RS; Rygh P
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1993 Sep; 30(5):454-68. PubMed ID: 8218309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Changes of soft tissue profile in operated unilateral cleft lip and palate patients after maxillary protraction].
Xie Y; Duan Y; Wang D; Zhu S; Lu X
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Aug; 19(4):237-9. PubMed ID: 12539730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mandibular effects of maxillary distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate.
Doucet JC; Herlin C; Bigorre M; Bäumler C; Subsol G; Captier G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 43(6):702-7. PubMed ID: 24630071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
