These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

24 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29135772)

  • 1. How are medical groups identified as high-performing? The effect of different approaches to classification of performance.
    Ahluwalia SC; Damberg CL; Haas A; Shekelle PG
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Jul; 19(1):500. PubMed ID: 31319830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation framework for low performers and human resource management planning: Application to a life insurance company in Korea.
    Park BJ; Park MJ; Shin JG
    Eval Program Plann; 2024 Jun; 106():102463. PubMed ID: 38925047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Challenge for the future: assessing the quality of abdominal surgery using composite quality measures.
    Capelli G; Spolverato G
    BJS Open; 2023 Nov; 7(6):. PubMed ID: 37931234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Don't follow the leader: how ranking performance reduces meritocracy.
    Livan G
    R Soc Open Sci; 2019 Nov; 6(11):191255. PubMed ID: 31827860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Top performers are not the most impressive when extreme performance indicates unreliability.
    Denrell J; Liu C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Jun; 109(24):9331-6. PubMed ID: 22645350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Getting inside the head of Edinburgh Fringe performers.
    Ranscombe P
    Lancet Neurol; 2024 Apr; 23(4):341-342. PubMed ID: 38513673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The elicitation of patient and physician preferences for calculating consumer-based composite measures on hospital report cards: results of two discrete choice experiments.
    Emmert M; Rohrbacher S; Meier F; Heppe L; Drach C; Schindler A; Sander U; Patzelt C; Frömke C; Schöffski O; Lauerer M
    Eur J Health Econ; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38102524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of a percutaneous coronary intervention patient level composite measure for a clinical quality registry.
    Ayton D; Soh SE; Morello R; Ahern S; Earnest A; Brennan A; Lefkovits J; Evans S; Reid C; Ruseckaite R; McNeil J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Jan; 20(1):44. PubMed ID: 31952535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What Defines a High-Performing Health Care Delivery System: A Systematic Review.
    Ahluwalia SC; Damberg CL; Silverman M; Motala A; Shekelle PG
    Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2017 Sep; 43(9):450-459. PubMed ID: 28844231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Longitudinal Assessment of the Effect of Resident-Centered Care on Quality in Veterans Health Administration Community Living Centers.
    Sullivan JL; Shwartz M; Stolzmann K; Afable MK; Burgess JF
    Health Serv Res; 2018 Jun; 53(3):1819-1833. PubMed ID: 28369887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How robust are hospital ranks based on composite performance measures?
    Jacobs R; Goddard M; Smith PC
    Med Care; 2005 Dec; 43(12):1177-84. PubMed ID: 16299428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physician performance assessment: nonequivalence of primary care measures.
    Parkerton PH; Smith DG; Belin TR; Feldbau GA
    Med Care; 2003 Sep; 41(9):1034-47. PubMed ID: 12972843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement.
    Lindenauer PK; Remus D; Roman S; Rothberg MB; Benjamin EM; Ma A; Bratzler DW
    N Engl J Med; 2007 Feb; 356(5):486-96. PubMed ID: 17259444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can Composite Measures Provide a Different Perspective on Provider Performance Than Individual Measures?
    Shwartz M; Rosen AK; Burgess JF
    Med Care; 2017 Dec; 55(12):e99-e103. PubMed ID: 29135772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A probability metric for identifying high-performing facilities: an application for pay-for-performance programs.
    Shwartz M; Peköz EA; Burgess JF; Christiansen CL; Rosen AK; Berlowitz D
    Med Care; 2014 Dec; 52(12):1030-6. PubMed ID: 25304018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ranking hospital performance based on individual indicators: can we increase reliability by creating composite indicators?
    Austin PC; Ceyisakar IE; Steyerberg EW; Lingsma HF; Marang-van de Mheen PJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):131. PubMed ID: 31242857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.