These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29135866)
1. Importance of Perimodiolar Electrode Position for Psychoacoustic Discrimination in Cochlear Implantation. Ramos Macias A; Perez Zaballos MT; Ramos de Miguel A; Cervera Paz J Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e429-e437. PubMed ID: 29135866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The distance from the modiolus of perimodiolar electrode arrays of cochlear implants. Perényi Á; Nagy R; Dimák B; Csanády M; Jóri J; Kiss JG; Rovó L Orv Hetil; 2019 Aug; 160(31):1216-1222. PubMed ID: 31352808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imaging evaluation of electrode placement and effect on electrode discrimination on different cochlear implant electrode arrays. Ramos de Miguel Á; Argudo AA; Borkoski Barreiro SA; Falcón González JC; Ramos Macías A Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jun; 275(6):1385-1394. PubMed ID: 29610960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship Between Electrode-to-Modiolus Distance and Current Levels for Adults With Cochlear Implants. Davis TJ; Zhang D; Gifford RH; Dawant BM; Labadie RF; Noble JH Otol Neurotol; 2016 Jan; 37(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 26649603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Perimodiolar Electrodes: Imaging and Electrophysiological Outcomes. Mewes A; Brademann G; Hey M Otol Neurotol; 2020 Aug; 41(7):e934-e944. PubMed ID: 32658111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Effect of Electrode Position on Behavioral and Electrophysiologic Measurements in Perimodiolar Cochlear Implants. Collins A; Foghsgaard S; Druce E; Margani V; Mejia O; O'Leary S Otol Neurotol; 2024 Mar; 45(3):238-244. PubMed ID: 38238914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Effect of Round Window vs Cochleostomy Surgical Approaches on Cochlear Implant Electrode Position: A Flat-Panel Computed Tomography Study. Jiam NT; Jiradejvong P; Pearl MS; Limb CJ JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Sep; 142(9):873-80. PubMed ID: 27355198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Place-versus-Pitch Mismatch between a Perimodiolar and Lateral Wall Cochlear Implant Electrode Array in Patients with Single-Sided Deafness and a Cochlear Implant. Peters JPM; Bennink E; van Zanten GA Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 30995658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays. Hughes ML; Abbas PJ J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1538-47. PubMed ID: 16583899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Four-Point Impedance Changes After Cochlear Implantation for Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Implants. Razmovski T; Bester C; Collins A; Tan E; O'Leary SJ Otol Neurotol; 2022 Dec; 43(10):e1107-e1114. PubMed ID: 36351225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrical Impedance as a Biomarker for Inner Ear Pathology Following Lateral Wall and Peri-modiolar Cochlear Implantation. Shaul C; Bester CW; Weder S; Choi J; Eastwood H; Padmavathi KV; Collins A; O'Leary SJ Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jun; 40(5):e518-e526. PubMed ID: 31083087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrophysiological detection of scalar changing perimodiolar cochlear electrode arrays: a long term follow-up study. Mittmann P; Todt I; Ernst A; Rademacher G; Mutze S; Göricke S; Schlamann M; Ramalingam R; Lang S; Christov F; Arweiler-Harbeck D Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 273(12):4251-4256. PubMed ID: 27351885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of Neural Interface When Using Modiolar Electrode Stimulation. Radiological Evaluation, Trans-Impedance Matrix Analysis and Effect on Listening Effort in Cochlear Implantation. Ramos-de-Miguel A; Falcón-González JC; Ramos-Macias A J Clin Med; 2021 Aug; 10(17):. PubMed ID: 34501410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cochleostomy and facial recess packing alter cochlear implant electrode location in a human cochlea model. Dedmon MM; O'Connell BP; Yawn RJ; Rivas A Am J Otolaryngol; 2018; 39(5):489-492. PubMed ID: 29805061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of cochlear morphology on the final electrode array position. Ketterer MC; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hassepass F; Wesarg T; Laszig R; Beck R Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 275(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 29242990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting Cochlear Implant Electrode Placement Using Monopolar, Three-Point and Four-Point Impedance Measurements. Sijgers L; Huber A; Tabibi S; Grosse J; Roosli C; Boyle P; Koka K; Dillier N; Pfiffner F; Dalbert A IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2022 Aug; 69(8):2533-2544. PubMed ID: 35143392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cochlear's unique electrode portfolio now and in the future. von Wallenberg E; Briggs R Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15 Suppl 1():S59-61. PubMed ID: 24869446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of electrode impedance and its subcomponents for lateral wall, mid-scala, and perimodiolar electrodes in cochlear implants. Saoji AA; Graham M; Stein A; Koka K Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 Mar; 23(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 34895078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modiolar proximity of three perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes. Balkany TJ; Eshraghi AA; Yang N Acta Otolaryngol; 2002 Jun; 122(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 12125990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]