These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29135866)
21. Clinical evaluation of the Clarion CII HiFocus 1 with and without positioner. van der Beek FB; Boermans PP; Verbist BM; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):577-92. PubMed ID: 16377994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Threshold, comfortable level and impedance changes as a function of electrode-modiolar distance. Saunders E; Cohen L; Aschendorff A; Shapiro W; Knight M; Stecker M; Richter B; Waltzman S; Tykocinski M; Roland T; Laszig R; Cowan R Ear Hear; 2002 Feb; 23(1 Suppl):28S-40S. PubMed ID: 11883764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of perimodiolar placement on speech perception and frequency discrimination by cochlear implant users. Fitzgerald MB; Shapiro WH; McDonald PD; Neuburger HS; Ashburn-Reed S; Immerman S; Jethanamest D; Roland JT; Svirsky MA Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Apr; 127(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 17453457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical investigation of the Nucleus Slim Modiolar Electrode. Aschendorff A; Briggs R; Brademann G; Helbig S; Hornung J; Lenarz T; Marx M; Ramos A; Stöver T; Escudé B; James CJ Audiol Neurootol; 2017; 22(3):169-179. PubMed ID: 29059669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Elimination of facial nerve stimulation by reimplantation in cochlear implant subjects. Battmer R; Pesch J; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz M; Lenarz T Otol Neurotol; 2006 Oct; 27(7):918-22. PubMed ID: 17006341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Retrospective Evaluation of a Technique for Patient-Customized Placement of Precurved Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays. Wang J; Dawant BM; Labadie RF; Noble JH Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Jul; 157(1):107-112. PubMed ID: 28374623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of electrophysiological parameters between perimodiolar and lateral wall electrodes in paediatric cochlear implant users. Zarowski A; Molisz A; Mylanus EAM; Miserus JHM; Leblans M; van Dinther J; Siebert J; Offeciers EF Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Oct; 277(10):2693-2699. PubMed ID: 32342198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Intracochlear Position of Cochlear Implants Determined Using CT Scanning versus Fitting Levels: Higher Threshold Levels at Basal Turn. van der Beek FB; Briaire JJ; van der Marel KS; Verbist BM; Frijns JH Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 26891130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Electrode migration after cochlear implant surgery: more common than expected? Dietz A; Wennström M; Lehtimäki A; Löppönen H; Valtonen H Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jun; 273(6):1411-8. PubMed ID: 26164294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An overview of cochlear implant electrode array designs. Dhanasingh A; Jolly C Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 356():93-103. PubMed ID: 29102129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Is electrode-modiolus distance a prognostic factor for hearing performances after cochlear implant surgery? Esquia Medina GN; Borel S; Nguyen Y; Ambert-Dahan E; Ferrary E; Sterkers O; Grayeli AB Audiol Neurootol; 2013; 18(6):406-13. PubMed ID: 24157488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cochlear structures after implantation of a perimodiolar electrode array. Richter B; Jaekel K; Aschendorff A; Marangos N; Laszig R Laryngoscope; 2001 May; 111(5):837-43. PubMed ID: 11359162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of Electrode to Modiolus Distance on Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Parameters in CI Patients With Perimodiolar and Lateral Electrode Arrays. Degen CV; Büchner A; Kludt E; Lenarz T Otol Neurotol; 2020 Oct; 41(9):e1091-e1097. PubMed ID: 32925843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Pull-Back Technique for the 532 Slim Modiolar Electrode. Riemann C; Sudhoff H; Todt I Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():6917084. PubMed ID: 31240221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of in vivo repositioning of slim modiolar electrodes on electrical thresholds and speech perception. Lee SY; Kim YS; Jo HD; Kim Y; Carandang M; Huh G; Choi BY Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):15135. PubMed ID: 34302030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Variance of angular insertion depths in free-fitting and perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes. Radeloff A; Mack M; Baghi M; Gstoettner WK; Adunka OF Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 18090204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Variations in microanatomy of the human modiolus require individualized cochlear implantation. Pietsch M; Schurzig D; Salcher R; Warnecke A; Erfurt P; Lenarz T; Kral A Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):5047. PubMed ID: 35322066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Extrusion of straight cochlear implant electrodes May be diminished by proximal fixation. Zawawi F; Cushing SL; James AL; Gordon KA; Papsin BC Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jan; 116():164-167. PubMed ID: 30554690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Imaging of electrode position in relation to electrode functioning after cochlear implantation. van Wermeskerken GK; van Olphen AF; Graamans K Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Oct; 266(10):1527-31. PubMed ID: 19308437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]