These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29135866)

  • 41. [Direction of cochlear implant developments used for the correction of perimodiolar discrimination location].
    Nagy R; Rovó L; Bere Z; Molnár F; Perényi Á; Posta B; Tóbiás Z; Beinschroth N; Csanády M
    Orv Hetil; 2024 Sep; 165(37):1452-1460. PubMed ID: 39277852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Scalar localization by cone-beam computed tomography of cochlear implant carriers: a comparative study between straight and periomodiolar precurved electrode arrays.
    Boyer E; Karkas A; Attye A; Lefournier V; Escude B; Schmerber S
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Mar; 36(3):422-9. PubMed ID: 25575374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluation of Intracochlear Position of a Slim Modiolar Electrode Array, by Using Different Radiological Analyses.
    Ramos de Miguel Á; Durmo I; Falcón González JC; Borkoski Barreiro S; Ramos Macías A
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jun; 40(5S Suppl 1):S10-S17. PubMed ID: 31225817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the nucleus contour advance electrode with the advance off stylet technique.
    Huang TC; Reitzen SD; Marrinan MS; Waltzman SB; Roland JT
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16436984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Robotic pullback technique of a precurved cochlear-implant electrode array using real-time impedance sensing feedback.
    Riojas KE; Bruns TL; Granna J; Webster RJ; Labadie RF
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2023 Mar; 18(3):413-421. PubMed ID: 36331796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Round window membrane insertion with perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes.
    Coordes A; Ernst A; Brademann G; Todt I
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1027-32. PubMed ID: 23507991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Electrode Migration in Patients with Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Electrodes.
    Mittmann P; Rademacher G; Mutze S; Ernst A; Todt I
    Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20(6):349-53. PubMed ID: 26340539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Considerations and Rationale for Cochlear Implant Electrode Design - Past, Present and Future.
    Risi F
    J Int Adv Otol; 2018 Dec; 14(3):382-391. PubMed ID: 30644379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The Role of Electrode Placement in Bilateral Simultaneously Cochlear-Implanted Adult Patients.
    De Seta D; Nguyen Y; Bonnard D; Ferrary E; Godey B; Bakhos D; Mondain M; Deguine O; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D; Mosnier I
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Sep; 155(3):485-93. PubMed ID: 27165685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Assessment of intracochlear electrode position and correlation with behavioural thresholds in CII and 90K cochlear implants.
    Filipo R; Mancini P; Panebianco V; Viccaro M; Covelli E; Vergari V; Passariello R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Mar; 128(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 18274915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Electrode migration after cochlear implantation.
    von Mitzlaff C; Dalbert A; Winklhofer S; Veraguth D; Huber A; Röösli C
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2021 Mar; 22(2):103-110. PubMed ID: 33148136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Modiolar Proximity of Slim Modiolar Electrodes and Cochlear Duct Length: Correlation for Potential Basis of Customized Cochlear Implantation With Perimodiolar Electrodes.
    Lee SY; Jung Bae Y; Carandang M; Kim Y; Hee Han J; Huh G; Song JJ; Koo JW; Ho Lee J; Ha Oh S; Choi BY
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):323-333. PubMed ID: 32826506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Simpler and effective radiological evaluations for modiolar proximity of a slim modiolar cochlear implant electrode.
    Lee SY; Han JH; Carandang M; Bae YJ; Choi BY
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):17714. PubMed ID: 33077822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The "pull-back" technique for Nucleus 24 perimodiolar electrode insertion.
    Todt I; Basta D; Eisenschenk A; Ernst A
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 May; 132(5):751-4. PubMed ID: 15886630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Real-Time Localization of Cochlear-Implant Electrode Arrays Using Bipolar Impedance Sensing.
    Bruns TL; Riojas KE; Labadie RF; Webster Iii RJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2022 Feb; 69(2):718-724. PubMed ID: 34379586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effect of initial switch-on within 24 hours of cochlear implantation using slim modiolar electrodes.
    Sunwoo W; Jeon HW; Choi BY
    Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22809. PubMed ID: 34815432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Differences in the impedance of cochlear implant devices within 24 hours of their implantation.
    Lin DP; Chen JK; Tung TH; Li LP
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222711. PubMed ID: 31536550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cone-beam computed tomography in children with cochlear implants: The effect of electrode array position on ECAP.
    Lathuillière M; Merklen F; Piron JP; Sicard M; Villemus F; Menjot de Champfleur N; Venail F; Uziel A; Mondain M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jan; 92():27-31. PubMed ID: 28012529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Stimulation parameters differ between current anti-modiolar and peri-modiolar electrode arrays implanted within the same child.
    Polonenko MJ; Cushing SL; Gordon KA; Allemang B; Jewell S; Papsin BC
    J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Nov; 130(11):1007-1021. PubMed ID: 27739380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Spread of excitation and channel interaction in single- and dual-electrode cochlear implant stimulation.
    Snel-Bongers J; Briaire JJ; Vanpoucke FJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 22048258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.