These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29135866)

  • 81. [Visualization of cochlear implant electrode movements in the cochlea by using x-ray microscopy].
    Hüttenbrink KB; Zahnert T; Hofmann G; Kronholz G; Jolly C
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Feb; 80(2):66-70. PubMed ID: 11253567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Effect of deep insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array on pitch estimation and speech perception.
    Hamzavi J; Arnoldner C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Dec; 126(11):1182-7. PubMed ID: 17050311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Possibility of differentiation of cochlear electrodes in radiological measurements of the intracochlear and chorda-facial angle position.
    Diogo I; Walliczeck U; Taube J; Franke N; Teymoortash A; Werner J; Güldner C
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2016 Aug; 36(4):310-316. PubMed ID: 27734984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Use of "phantom electrode" technique to extend the range of pitches available through a cochlear implant.
    Saoji AA; Litvak LM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):693-701. PubMed ID: 20467321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Psychophysical Tuning Curves as a Correlate of Electrode Position in Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    DeVries L; Arenberg JG
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Oct; 19(5):571-587. PubMed ID: 29869047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. [Impedance changes in cochlear implant users].
    Zadrozniak M; Szymański M; Siwiec H; Broda T
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2011; 65(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 21916223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. [Study of electrode impedance and NRT value characteristics with cochlear implants in children with malformed inner ear and normal inner ear].
    Qiao X; Wang D
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 27(22):1231-3. PubMed ID: 24616978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Dispersed Hydrogel Actuator for Modiolar Hugging Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays.
    Stieghorst J; Doll T
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Nov; 63(11):2294-2300. PubMed ID: 26863644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Atraumaticity study of 2 cochlear implant electrode arrays.
    Manrique M; Picciafuoco S; Manrique R; Sanhueza I; Domínguez P; Pérez N; Zubieta JL; de Abajo J
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Apr; 35(4):619-28. PubMed ID: 24569795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Radiological and NRT-Ratio-Based Estimation of Slim Straight Cochlear Implant Electrode Positions: A Multicenter Study.
    Mittmann P; Todt I; Ernst A; Rademacher G; Mutze S; Göricke S; Schlamann M; Lang S; Arweiler-Harbeck D; Christov F
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2017 Jan; 126(1):73-78. PubMed ID: 27780910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Intracochlear Pressure Changes due to 2 Electrode Types: An Artificial Model Experiment.
    Mittmann P; Mittmann M; Ernst A; Todt I
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Apr; 156(4):712-716. PubMed ID: 28025904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Electrophysiological effects of electrode pull-back in cochlear implant surgery.
    Todt I; Basta D; Seidl R; Ernst A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008; 128(12):1314-21. PubMed ID: 18607948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Pure tone discrimination with cochlear implants and filter-band spread.
    Wagner L; Altindal R; Plontke SK; Rahne T
    Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):20236. PubMed ID: 34642437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
    Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Electrophysiologic effects of placing cochlear implant electrodes in a perimodiolar position in young children.
    Wackym PA; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Reeder RM; Raulie JC
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 14709998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Evaluation of CI electrode position from imaging: comparison of an automated technique with the established manual method.
    Mewes A; Bennett C; Dambon J; Brademann G; Hey M
    BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Sep; 23(1):143. PubMed ID: 37773060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Psychophysics of a prototype peri-modiolar cochlear implant electrode array.
    Cohen LT; Saunders E; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 2001 May; 155(1-2):63-81. PubMed ID: 11335077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Intraoperative Electrophysiologic Variations Caused by the Scalar Position of Cochlear Implant Electrodes.
    Mittmann P; Ernst A; Todt I
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 25730445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. An evidence-based guide for intraoperative cochlear implant backup use.
    Khater AM; Moustafa MF; Said A; Fahmy HS
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1500-4. PubMed ID: 26231744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Cochlear implant place psychophysics 1. Pitch estimation with deeply inserted electrodes.
    Cohen LT; Busby PA; Whitford LA; Clark GM
    Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(5):265-77. PubMed ID: 9390808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.