These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29136098)

  • 1. Sequential search leads to faster, more efficient fragment-based de novo protein structure prediction.
    de Oliveira SHP; Law EC; Shi J; Deane CM
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Apr; 34(7):1132-1140. PubMed ID: 29136098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing co-evolution methods and their application to template-free protein structure prediction.
    de Oliveira SH; Shi J; Deane CM
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 33(3):373-381. PubMed ID: 28171606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combining co-evolution and secondary structure prediction to improve fragment library generation.
    de Oliveira SHP; Deane CM
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 34(13):2219-2227. PubMed ID: 29462243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Granular clustering of de novo protein models.
    Guzenko D; Strelkov SV
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 33(3):390-396. PubMed ID: 28171609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MMpred: a distance-assisted multimodal conformation sampling for de novo protein structure prediction.
    Zhao KL; Liu J; Zhou XG; Su JZ; Zhang Y; Zhang GJ
    Bioinformatics; 2021 Dec; 37(23):4350-4356. PubMed ID: 34185079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Building a better fragment library for de novo protein structure prediction.
    de Oliveira SH; Shi J; Deane CM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0123998. PubMed ID: 25901595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accurate De Novo Prediction of Protein Contact Map by Ultra-Deep Learning Model.
    Wang S; Sun S; Li Z; Zhang R; Xu J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Jan; 13(1):e1005324. PubMed ID: 28056090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sphinx: merging knowledge-based and ab initio approaches to improve protein loop prediction.
    Marks C; Nowak J; Klostermann S; Georges G; Dunbar J; Shi J; Kelm S; Deane CM
    Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 33(9):1346-1353. PubMed ID: 28453681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The evolution of contact prediction: evidence that contact selection in statistical contact prediction is changing.
    Chonofsky M; de Oliveira SHP; Krawczyk K; Deane CM
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 36(6):1750-1756. PubMed ID: 31693112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MetaPSICOV: combining coevolution methods for accurate prediction of contacts and long range hydrogen bonding in proteins.
    Jones DT; Singh T; Kosciolek T; Tetchner S
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Apr; 31(7):999-1006. PubMed ID: 25431331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. TCRBuilder: multi-state T-cell receptor structure prediction.
    Wong WK; Marks C; Leem J; Lewis AP; Shi J; Deane CM
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Jun; 36(11):3580-3581. PubMed ID: 32181809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. UniCon3D: de novo protein structure prediction using united-residue conformational search via stepwise, probabilistic sampling.
    Bhattacharya D; Cao R; Cheng J
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Sep; 32(18):2791-9. PubMed ID: 27259540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating de novo sequencing in proteomics: already an accurate alternative to database-driven peptide identification?
    Muth T; Renard BY
    Brief Bioinform; 2018 Sep; 19(5):954-970. PubMed ID: 28369237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fragment-HMM: a new approach to protein structure prediction.
    Li SC; Bu D; Xu J; Li M
    Protein Sci; 2008 Nov; 17(11):1925-34. PubMed ID: 18723665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. LRFragLib: an effective algorithm to identify fragments for de novo protein structure prediction.
    Wang T; Yang Y; Zhou Y; Gong H
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Mar; 33(5):677-684. PubMed ID: 27797773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A de novo protein structure prediction by iterative partition sampling, topology adjustment and residue-level distance deviation optimization.
    Liu J; Zhao KL; He GX; Wang LJ; Zhou XG; Zhang GJ
    Bioinformatics; 2021 Dec; 38(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 34459867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Domain prediction with probabilistic directional context.
    Ochoa A; Singh M
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Aug; 33(16):2471-2478. PubMed ID: 28407137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A low-complexity add-on score for protein remote homology search with COMER.
    Margelevicius M
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Jun; 34(12):2037-2045. PubMed ID: 29390109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting loop conformational ensembles.
    Marks C; Shi J; Deane CM
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Mar; 34(6):949-956. PubMed ID: 29136084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PaRSnIP: sequence-based protein solubility prediction using gradient boosting machine.
    Rawi R; Mall R; Kunji K; Shen CH; Kwong PD; Chuang GY
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Apr; 34(7):1092-1098. PubMed ID: 29069295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.