These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2913617)

  • 1. A demonstration comparing film mammography with the new high sensitivity xeromammography.
    Martin JE
    Radiographics; 1989 Jan; 9(1):153-68. PubMed ID: 2913617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Practical experiences with grid mammography in everyday practice].
    Lendvai-Virágh K; Lendvai T; Rückner R
    Rontgenblatter; 1983 Sep; 36(9):289-93. PubMed ID: 6635487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microfocal spot magnification mammography using xeroradiographic and screen-film recording systems.
    Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 441362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiological guidelines for the detection of early breast cancer: a review.
    Van den Bosch H; Seynaeve P; Kockx MM; Storms JL
    J Belge Radiol; 1990 Oct; 73(5):339-56. PubMed ID: 2273042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of mammography screen-film combinations.
    Schueler BA; Gray JE; Gisvold JJ
    Radiology; 1992 Sep; 184(3):629-34. PubMed ID: 1509043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammographic microcalcifications: detection with xerography, screen-film, and digitized film display.
    Smathers RL; Bush E; Drace J; Stevens M; Sommer FG; Brown BW; Karras B
    Radiology; 1986 Jun; 159(3):673-7. PubMed ID: 3704149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic quality of mammograms obtained with a new low-radiation-dose dual-screen and dual-emulsion film combination.
    Wojtasek DA; Teixidor HS; Govoni AF; Gareen IF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Feb; 154(2):265-70. PubMed ID: 2105011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-contrast mammography with a moving grid: assessment of clinical utility.
    Sickles EA; Weber WN
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Jun; 146(6):1137-9. PubMed ID: 3518365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Experimental studies on image quality in conventional film screen system, digital phosphor storage plate mammography in mangnification technique and digital mammography in CCD-technique].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Säbel M; Böhner C; Dobritz M; Bautz W
    Rofo; 2000 Dec; 172(12):965-8. PubMed ID: 11199438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screen-film mammography versus xeromammography in the detection of breast cancer.
    Cuttino JT; Yankaskas BC; Hoskins EO
    Br J Radiol; 1986 Dec; 59(708):1159-62. PubMed ID: 3801794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast imaging: a comparison of digital luminescence radiographs displayed on TV-monitor and film-screen mammography.
    Jarlman O; Borg A; Braw M; Kehler M; Lyttkens K; Samuelsson L
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1994; 18(5):375-81. PubMed ID: 7812984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography.
    Dimakopoulou AD; Tsalafoutas IA; Georgiou EK; Yakoumakis EN
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Current x-ray diagnostic problems in breast cancer (a review)].
    Rozhkova NI
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1981 Nov; 26(11):68-73. PubMed ID: 7033712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survey of mammography practices.
    Bassett LW; Diamond JJ; Gold RH; McLelland R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Dec; 149(6):1149-52. PubMed ID: 3318338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [ROC-analysis in x-ray study of the breast; a comparative study between film and xeromammography].
    John V; Callies R; Hirche H; Parson C; Tonge K; Lenz W
    Onkologie; 1979 Oct; 2(5):193-8. PubMed ID: 395475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CT scanning of the breast in problem cases.
    John V; Ewen K
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1989 Sep; 165(9):657-62. PubMed ID: 2799627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Magnification film mammography: image quality and clinical studies.
    Sickles EA; Doi K; Genant HK
    Radiology; 1977 Oct; 125(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 897191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of an Agfa and Kodak film-screen combination for mammography.
    Dudson J
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1994 Dec; 17(4):211-6. PubMed ID: 7872903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammographic dual-screen-dual-emulsion-film combination: visibility of simulated microcalcifications and effect on image contrast.
    Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Roe D; Orr J
    Radiology; 1987 Nov; 165(2):313-8. PubMed ID: 3310091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.