These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29137057)

  • 1. Readability of internet-sourced patient education material related to "labour analgesia".
    Boztas N; Omur D; Ozbılgın S; Altuntas G; Piskin E; Ozkardesler S; Hanci V
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Nov; 96(45):e8526. PubMed ID: 29137057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing parental comprehension of online resources on childhood pain.
    Ocmen E; Erdemir I; Aksu Erdost H; Hanci V
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Jun; 103(25):e38569. PubMed ID: 38905405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources.
    Kong KA; Hu A
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Feb; 152(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 25450410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the Readability, Quality, and Reliability of Online Patient Education Materials on Spinal Cord Stimulation.
    Gunduz ME; Matis GK; Ozduran E; Hanci V
    Turk Neurosurg; 2024; 34(4):588-599. PubMed ID: 38874237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Readability assessment of Internet-based patient education materials related to endoscopic sinus surgery.
    Cherla DV; Sanghvi S; Choudhry OJ; Liu JK; Eloy JA
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Aug; 122(8):1649-54. PubMed ID: 22685030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Readability, Content, and Quality Assessment of Web-Based Patient Education Materials Addressing Neuraxial Labor Analgesia.
    Patel SK; Gordon EJ; Wong CA; Grobman WA; Goucher H; Toledo P
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Nov; 121(5):1295-300. PubMed ID: 26252170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.
    Skalitzky MK; Gulbrandsen TR; Lorentzen W; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Weinstein SL; Morcuende JA
    Iowa Orthop J; 2021; 41(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 34552405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of internet-based patient education materials related to pituitary tumors.
    Cherla DV; Sanghvi S; Agarwal N; Eloy JA; Couldwell WT; Liu JK
    Endocr Pract; 2014 Oct; 20(10):1044-50. PubMed ID: 24936564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Academic and community hernia center websites in the United States fail to meet healthcare literacy standards of readability.
    Docimo S; Seeras K; Acho R; Pryor A; Spaniolas K
    Hernia; 2022 Jun; 26(3):779-786. PubMed ID: 35344107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How readable and quality are online patient education materials about Helicobacter pylori?: Assessment of the readability, quality and reliability.
    Yilmaz Hanci S
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Oct; 102(43):e35543. PubMed ID: 37904459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
    Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
    Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.
    Jain M; Chkipov P; Stacey D; Posner G; Bacal V; Chen I
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Aug; 44(8):870-876. PubMed ID: 35487458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Readability of online monkeypox patient education materials: Improved recognition of health literacy is needed for dissemination of infectious disease information.
    Frost JC; Baldwin AJ
    Infect Dis Health; 2023 May; 28(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 36564245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of the Readability of the Online Patient Education Materials of Intensive and Critical Care Societies.
    Hanci V; Otlu B; Biyikoğlu AS
    Crit Care Med; 2024 Feb; 52(2):e47-e57. PubMed ID: 37962133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to mammography for breast cancer screening.
    AlKhalili R; Shukla PA; Patel RH; Sanghvi S; Hubbi B
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 25488695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Information about oral cancer on the Internet: our patients cannot understand it.
    Varela-Centelles P; Ledesma-Ludi Y; Seoane-Romero JM; Seoane J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 53(4):393-5. PubMed ID: 25703184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Readability Assessment of Online Uveitis Patient Education Materials.
    Ayoub S; Tsui E; Mohammed T; Tseng J
    Ocul Immunol Inflamm; 2019; 27(3):399-403. PubMed ID: 29286863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Readability analysis of online health information on preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP).
    Kecojevic A; Basch CH; Garcia P
    Public Health; 2020 May; 182():53-55. PubMed ID: 32171091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to facial fractures.
    Sanghvi S; Cherla DV; Shukla PA; Eloy JA
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Sep; 122(9):1943-8. PubMed ID: 22833340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.