These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. A survey on the influence of CYBATHLON on the development and acceptance of advanced assistive technologies. Meyer JT; Weber S; Jäger L; Sigrist R; Gassert R; Lambercy O J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Apr; 19(1):38. PubMed ID: 35366930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. JNER at 15 years: analysis of the state of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. Reinkensmeyer DJ J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Oct; 16(1):144. PubMed ID: 31744511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Integrating medical, assistive, and universal design products and technologies: Assistive Technology Service Method (ATSM). Elsaesser LJ; Bauer S Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2012 Jul; 7(4):282-6. PubMed ID: 22188388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethical adoption: A new imperative in the development of technology for dementia. Robillard JM; Cleland I; Hoey J; Nugent C Alzheimers Dement; 2018 Sep; 14(9):1104-1113. PubMed ID: 29937247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrating assistive technologies: current practices and future possibilities. Nisbet P Med Eng Phys; 1996 Apr; 18(3):193-202. PubMed ID: 8718944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethical concerns with the use of intelligent assistive technology: findings from a qualitative study with professional stakeholders. Wangmo T; Lipps M; Kressig RW; Ienca M BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Dec; 20(1):98. PubMed ID: 31856798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Aging 4.0? Rethinking the ethical framing of technology-assisted eldercare. Schicktanz S; Schweda M Hist Philos Life Sci; 2021 Aug; 43(3):93. PubMed ID: 34342739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assistive Technologies to Address Capabilities of People with Dementia: From Research to Practice. Kenigsberg PA; Aquino JP; Bérard A; Brémond F; Charras K; Dening T; Droës RM; Gzil F; Hicks B; Innes A; Nguyen SM; Nygård L; Pino M; Sacco G; Salmon E; van der Roest H; Villet H; Villez M; Robert P; Manera V Dementia (London); 2019 May; 18(4):1568-1595. PubMed ID: 28699364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assistive technology, telecare and people with intellectual disabilities: ethical considerations. Perry J; Beyer S; Holm S J Med Ethics; 2009 Feb; 35(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 19181877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Applying a Universal Design Approach to Empower Children with Multiple Impairments in Assistive Technology Assessment. MacKeogh T; Dillenburg K; Donovan J Stud Health Technol Inform; 2018; 256():870-880. PubMed ID: 30371453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethical challenges in the use of social service robots for elderly people. Körtner T Z Gerontol Geriatr; 2016 Jun; 49(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 27220734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Cybathlon promotes the development of assistive technology for people with physical disabilities. Riener R J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 May; 13(1):49. PubMed ID: 27246601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Technology transfer of brain-computer interfaces as assistive technology: barriers and opportunities. Nijboer F Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Feb; 58(1):35-38. PubMed ID: 25595535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Megatrends in rehabilitation: a Canadian perspective. Symington DC Int J Rehabil Res; 1994 Mar; 17(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 7960324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Translating civilian and defense technologies for pediatric critical care and rehabilitation research. Wagner NJ; Quatrano LA; Nicholson CE Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 16556963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rehabilitation engineering training for the future: influence of trends in academics, technology, and health reform. Winters JM Assist Technol; 1995; 7(2):95-110. PubMed ID: 10159863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]