These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29138310)

  • 1. Sparsity enables estimation of both subcortical and cortical activity from MEG and EEG.
    Krishnaswamy P; Obregon-Henao G; Ahveninen J; Khan S; Babadi B; Iglesias JE; Hämäläinen MS; Purdon PL
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Nov; 114(48):E10465-E10474. PubMed ID: 29138310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cortical Signal Suppression (CSS) for Detection of Subcortical Activity Using MEG and EEG.
    Samuelsson JG; Khan S; Sundaram P; Peled N; Hämäläinen MS
    Brain Topogr; 2019 Mar; 32(2):215-228. PubMed ID: 30604048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simultaneous EEG and MEG source reconstruction in sparse electromagnetic source imaging.
    Ding L; Yuan H
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2013 Apr; 34(4):775-95. PubMed ID: 22102512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a new MEG-EEG spatio-temporal localization approach using a realistic source model.
    Schwartz DP; Badier JM; Bihoué P; Bouliou A
    Brain Topogr; 1999; 11(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 10449259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Subspace Pursuit-based Iterative Greedy Hierarchical solution to the neuromagnetic inverse problem.
    Babadi B; Obregon-Henao G; Lamus C; Hämäläinen MS; Brown EN; Purdon PL
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 87():427-43. PubMed ID: 24055554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Empirical Bayes evaluation of fused EEG-MEG source reconstruction: Application to auditory mismatch evoked responses.
    Lecaignard F; Bertrand O; Caclin A; Mattout J
    Neuroimage; 2021 Feb; 226():117468. PubMed ID: 33075561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comprehensive study on electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography sensitivity to cortical and subcortical sources.
    Piastra MC; Nüßing A; Vorwerk J; Clerc M; Engwer C; Wolters CH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Mar; 42(4):978-992. PubMed ID: 33156569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combined mapping of human auditory EEG and MEG responses.
    Huotilainen M; Winkler I; Alho K; Escera C; Virtanen J; Ilmoniemi RJ; Jääskeläinen IP; Pekkonen E; Näätänen R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Jul; 108(4):370-9. PubMed ID: 9714379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
    Engemann DA; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian Algorithm Based Localization of EEG Recorded Electromagnetic Brain Activity.
    Jatoi MA; Kamel N; Musavi SHA; López JD
    Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2019; 15(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 31975664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mapping the signal-to-noise-ratios of cortical sources in magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
    Goldenholz DM; Ahlfors SP; Hämäläinen MS; Sharon D; Ishitobi M; Vaina LM; Stufflebeam SM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Apr; 30(4):1077-86. PubMed ID: 18465745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hierarchical multiscale Bayesian algorithm for robust MEG/EEG source reconstruction.
    Cai C; Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():698-715. PubMed ID: 30059734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cancellation of EEG and MEG signals generated by extended and distributed sources.
    Ahlfors SP; Han J; Lin FH; Witzel T; Belliveau JW; Hämäläinen MS; Halgren E
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2010 Jan; 31(1):140-9. PubMed ID: 19639553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subcortical sources dominate the neuroelectric auditory frequency-following response to speech.
    Bidelman GM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 175():56-69. PubMed ID: 29604459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mapping cortical dynamics using simultaneous MEG/EEG and anatomically-constrained minimum-norm estimates: an auditory attention example.
    Lee AK; Larson E; Maddox RK
    J Vis Exp; 2012 Oct; (68):e4262. PubMed ID: 23128363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Beamformer source analysis and connectivity on concurrent EEG and MEG data during voluntary movements.
    Muthuraman M; Hellriegel H; Hoogenboom N; Anwar AR; Mideksa KG; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e91441. PubMed ID: 24618596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Matching pursuit and source deflation for sparse EEG/MEG dipole moment estimation.
    Wu SC; Swindlehurst AL
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Aug; 60(8):2280-8. PubMed ID: 23529074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multimodal integration of EEG and MEG data: a simulation study with variable signal-to-noise ratio and number of sensors.
    Babiloni F; Babiloni C; Carducci F; Romani GL; Rossini PM; Angelone LM; Cincotti F
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2004 May; 22(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 15083526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatially sparse source cluster modeling by compressive neuromagnetic tomography.
    Chang WT; Nummenmaa A; Hsieh JC; Lin FH
    Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 53(1):146-60. PubMed ID: 20488248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.