These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29138310)

  • 21. Assessment of subcortical source localization using deep brain activity imaging model with minimum norm operators: a MEG study.
    Attal Y; Schwartz D
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e59856. PubMed ID: 23527277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Modeling and detecting deep brain activity with MEG & EEG.
    Attal Y; Bhattacharjee M; Yelnik J; Cottereau B; Lefèvre J; Okada Y; Bardinet E; Chupin M; Baillet S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():4937-40. PubMed ID: 18003114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Localization Estimation Algorithm (LEA): a supervised prior-based approach for solving the EEG/MEG inverse problem.
    Mattout J; Pélégrini-Issac M; Bellio A; Daunizeau J; Benali H
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18():536-47. PubMed ID: 15344486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sparse current source estimation for MEG using loose orientation constraints.
    Chang WT; Ahlfors SP; Lin FH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2013 Sep; 34(9):2190-201. PubMed ID: 22438263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
    Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hyperedge bundling: A practical solution to spurious interactions in MEG/EEG source connectivity analyses.
    Wang SH; Lobier M; Siebenhühner F; Puoliväli T; Palva S; Palva JM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():610-622. PubMed ID: 29378318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Head models and dynamic causal modeling of subcortical activity using magnetoencephalographic/electroencephalographic data.
    Attal Y; Maess B; Friederici A; David O
    Rev Neurosci; 2012; 23(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 22718615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Investigation of EEG and MEG source imaging accuracy in reconstructing extended cortical sources.
    Ding L; Yuan H
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():7013-6. PubMed ID: 22255953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multi-subject MEG/EEG source imaging with sparse multi-task regression.
    Janati H; Bazeille T; Thirion B; Cuturi M; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2020 Oct; 220():116847. PubMed ID: 32438046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Localization Accuracy of Distributed Inverse Solutions for Electric and Magnetic Source Imaging of Interictal Epileptic Discharges in Patients with Focal Epilepsy.
    Heers M; Chowdhury RA; Hedrich T; Dubeau F; Hall JA; Lina JM; Grova C; Kobayashi E
    Brain Topogr; 2016 Jan; 29(1):162-81. PubMed ID: 25609211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Source estimation of spontaneous MEG activity and auditory evoked responses in normal subjects during sleep.
    Iramina K; Ueno S
    Brain Topogr; 1996; 8(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 8728422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dipole source analysis for readiness potential and field using simultaneously measured EEG and MEG signals.
    Mideksa KG; Hellriegel H; Hoogenboom N; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J; Heute U; Muthuraman M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1362-5. PubMed ID: 24109949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Spatiotemporal forward solution of the EEG and MEG using network modeling.
    Jirsa VK; Jantzen KJ; Fuchs A; Kelso JA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 May; 21(5):493-504. PubMed ID: 12071620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Linear inverse source estimate of combined EEG and MEG data related to voluntary movements.
    Babiloni F; Carducci F; Cincotti F; Del Gratta C; Pizzella V; Romani GL; Rossini PM; Tecchio F; Babiloni C
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2001 Dec; 14(4):197-209. PubMed ID: 11668651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. EEG and MEG: sensitivity to epileptic spike activity as function of source orientation and depth.
    Hunold A; Funke ME; Eichardt R; Stenroos M; Haueisen J
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jul; 37(7):1146-62. PubMed ID: 27328313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Anatomically constrained dipole adjustment (ANACONDA) for accurate MEG/EEG focal source localizations.
    Im CH; Jung HK; Fujimaki N
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(20):4931-53. PubMed ID: 16204881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sparse EEG/MEG source estimation via a group lasso.
    Lim M; Ales JM; Cottereau BR; Hastie T; Norcia AM
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0176835. PubMed ID: 28604790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. EEG/MEG source imaging using fMRI informed time-variant constraints.
    Xu J; Sheng J; Qian T; Luo YJ; Gao JH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Apr; 39(4):1700-1711. PubMed ID: 29293277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sensitivity of EEG and MEG to the N1 and P2 auditory evoked responses modulated by spectral complexity of sounds.
    Shahin AJ; Roberts LE; Miller LM; McDonald KL; Alain C
    Brain Topogr; 2007; 20(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 17899352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. New Cognitive Neurotechnology Facilitates Studies of Cortical-Subcortical Interactions.
    Min BK; Hämäläinen MS; Pantazis D
    Trends Biotechnol; 2020 Sep; 38(9):952-962. PubMed ID: 32278504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.