750 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29138794)
1. Noninvasive Cardiac Testing vs Clinical Evaluation Alone in Acute Chest Pain: A Secondary Analysis of the ROMICAT-II Randomized Clinical Trial.
Reinhardt SW; Lin CJ; Novak E; Brown DL
JAMA Intern Med; 2018 Feb; 178(2):212-219. PubMed ID: 29138794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of Race on Outcomes Following Early Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography or Standard Emergency Department Evaluation for Acute Chest Pain.
Reinhardt SW; Babatunde A; Novak E; Brown DL
Ethn Dis; 2018; 28(4):517-524. PubMed ID: 30405295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sex differences in the effectiveness of early coronary computed tomographic angiography compared with standard emergency department evaluation for acute chest pain: the rule-out myocardial infarction with Computer-Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT)-II Trial.
Truong QA; Hayden D; Woodard PK; Kirby R; Chou ET; Nagurney JT; Wiviott SD; Fleg JL; Schoenfeld DA; Udelson JE; Hoffmann U
Circulation; 2013 Jun; 127(25):2494-502. PubMed ID: 23685743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Associations between routine coronary computed tomographic angiography and reduced unnecessary hospital admissions, length of stay, recidivism rates, and invasive coronary angiography in the emergency department triage of chest pain.
Poon M; Cortegiano M; Abramowicz AJ; Hines M; Singer AJ; Henry MC; Viccellio P; Hellinger JC; Ferraro S; Poon A; Raff GL; Voros S; Farkouh ME; Noack P
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Aug; 62(6):543-52. PubMed ID: 23684682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Coronary CT Angiography Versus Standard Emergency Department Evaluation for Acute Chest Pain and Diabetic Patients: Is There Benefit With Early Coronary CT Angiography? Results of the Randomized Comparative Effectiveness ROMICAT II Trial.
Truong QA; Schulman-Marcus J; Zakroysky P; Chou ET; Nagurney JT; Fleg JL; Schoenfeld DA; Udelson JE; Hoffmann U; Woodard PK
J Am Heart Assoc; 2016 Mar; 5(3):e003137. PubMed ID: 27006119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Design of the Rule Out Myocardial Ischemia/Infarction Using Computer Assisted Tomography: a multicenter randomized comparative effectiveness trial of cardiac computed tomography versus alternative triage strategies in patients with acute chest pain in the emergency department.
Hoffmann U; Truong QA; Fleg JL; Goehler A; Gazelle S; Wiviott S; Lee H; Udelson JE; Schoenfeld D;
Am Heart J; 2012 Mar; 163(3):330-8, 338.e1. PubMed ID: 22424002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative Trends and Downstream Outcomes of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and Cardiac Stress Testing in Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain: An Administrative Claims Analysis.
Morris JR; Bellolio MF; Sangaralingham LR; Schilz SR; Shah ND; Goyal DG; Bell MR; Kopecky SL; Gilani WI; Hess EP
Acad Emerg Med; 2016 Sep; 23(9):1022-30. PubMed ID: 27155236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of coronary artery calcium scanning beyond coronary computed tomographic angiography in the emergency department evaluation for acute chest pain: the ROMICAT II trial.
Pursnani A; Chou ET; Zakroysky P; Deaño RC; Mamuya WS; Woodard PK; Nagurney JT; Fleg JL; Lee H; Schoenfeld D; Udelson JE; Hoffmann U; Truong QA
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Mar; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 25710925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Rates of Coronary Angiography and Combined Testing Procedures in Patients Seen in the Emergency Room With Chest Pain (But No Objective Acute Coronary Syndrome Findings) Having Coronary Computed Tomography Versus Exercise Stress Testing.
Grunau B; Leipsic J; Purssell E; Kasteel N; Nguyen K; Kazem M; Naoum C; Raju R; Blanke P; Heilbron B; Taylor C; Scheuermeyer FX
Am J Cardiol; 2016 Jul; 118(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 27236251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain.
Hoffmann U; Truong QA; Schoenfeld DA; Chou ET; Woodard PK; Nagurney JT; Pope JH; Hauser TH; White CS; Weiner SG; Kalanjian S; Mullins ME; Mikati I; Peacock WF; Zakroysky P; Hayden D; Goehler A; Lee H; Gazelle GS; Wiviott SD; Fleg JL; Udelson JE;
N Engl J Med; 2012 Jul; 367(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 22830462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cardiovascular Testing and Clinical Outcomes in Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain.
Sandhu AT; Heidenreich PA; Bhattacharya J; Bundorf MK
JAMA Intern Med; 2017 Aug; 177(8):1175-1182. PubMed ID: 28654959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identification of Patients With Stable Chest Pain Deriving Minimal Value From Noninvasive Testing: The PROMISE Minimal-Risk Tool, A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Fordyce CB; Douglas PS; Roberts RS; Hoffmann U; Al-Khalidi HR; Patel MR; Granger CB; Kostis J; Mark DB; Lee KL; Udelson JE;
JAMA Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 2(4):400-408. PubMed ID: 28199464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High-risk plaque detected on coronary CT angiography predicts acute coronary syndromes independent of significant stenosis in acute chest pain: results from the ROMICAT-II trial.
Puchner SB; Liu T; Mayrhofer T; Truong QA; Lee H; Fleg JL; Nagurney JT; Udelson JE; Hoffmann U; Ferencik M
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Aug; 64(7):684-92. PubMed ID: 25125300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative effectiveness of diagnostic testing strategies in emergency department patients with chest pain: an analysis of downstream testing, interventions, and outcomes.
Foy AJ; Liu G; Davidson WR; Sciamanna C; Leslie DL
JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Mar; 175(3):428-36. PubMed ID: 25622287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Best Clinical Practice: Current Controversies in Evaluation of Low-Risk Chest Pain-Part 1.
Long B; Koyfman A
J Emerg Med; 2016 Dec; 51(6):668-676. PubMed ID: 27693075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic value of CT angiography for major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute chest pain from the emergency department: 2-year outcomes of the ROMICAT trial.
Schlett CL; Banerji D; Siegel E; Bamberg F; Lehman SJ; Ferencik M; Brady TJ; Nagurney JT; Hoffmann U; Truong QA
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 May; 4(5):481-91. PubMed ID: 21565735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Radionuclide Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Chest Pain Admitted to Telemetry: A Randomized Trial.
Levsky JM; Spevack DM; Travin MI; Menegus MA; Huang PW; Clark ET; Kim CW; Hirschhorn E; Freeman KD; Tobin JN; Haramati LB
Ann Intern Med; 2015 Aug; 163(3):174-83. PubMed ID: 26052677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Usefulness of 64-slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing acute coronary syndromes and predicting clinical outcome in emergency department patients with chest pain of uncertain origin.
Rubinshtein R; Halon DA; Gaspar T; Jaffe R; Karkabi B; Flugelman MY; Kogan A; Shapira R; Peled N; Lewis BS
Circulation; 2007 Apr; 115(13):1762-8. PubMed ID: 17372178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Low Adverse Event Rates But High Emergency Department Utilization in Chest Pain Patients Treated in an Emergency Department Observation Unit.
Napoli AM; Baird J; Tran S; Wang J
Crit Pathw Cardiol; 2017 Mar; 16(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 28195938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative effectiveness of coronary CT angiography vs stress cardiac imaging in patients following hospital admission for chest pain work-up: The Prospective First Evaluation in Chest Pain (PERFECT) Trial.
Uretsky S; Argulian E; Supariwala A; Agarwal SK; El-Hayek G; Chavez P; Awan H; Jagarlamudi A; Puppala SP; Cohen R; Rozanski A
J Nucl Cardiol; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1267-1278. PubMed ID: 27048306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
