220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29139383)
21. NGS panel analysis in 24 ectopia lentis patients; a clinically relevant test with a high diagnostic yield.
Overwater E; Floor K; van Beek D; de Boer K; van Dijk T; Hilhorst-Hofstee Y; Hoogeboom AJM; van Kaam KJ; van de Kamp JM; Kempers M; Krapels IPC; Kroes HY; Loeys B; Salemink S; Stumpel CTRM; Verhoeven VJM; Wijnands-van den Berg E; Cobben JM; van Tintelen JP; Weiss MM; Houweling AC; Maugeri A
Eur J Med Genet; 2017 Sep; 60(9):465-473. PubMed ID: 28642162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Principles of analytical validation of next-generation sequencing based mutational analysis for hematologic neoplasms in a CLIA-certified laboratory.
Kanagal-Shamanna R; Singh RR; Routbort MJ; Patel KP; Medeiros LJ; Luthra R
Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2016; 16(4):461-72. PubMed ID: 26765348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. More Pitfalls Related to Next-generation Sequencing (NGS).
Sorscher S
Am J Clin Oncol; 2016 Aug; 39(4):424. PubMed ID: 27465427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Reference standards for next-generation sequencing.
Hardwick SA; Deveson IW; Mercer TR
Nat Rev Genet; 2017 Aug; 18(8):473-484. PubMed ID: 28626224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Colorectal cancer molecular profiling: from IHC to NGS in search of optimal algorithm.
Furtado LV; Samowitz WS
Virchows Arch; 2017 Aug; 471(2):235-242. PubMed ID: 28551725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical utility in infants with suspected monogenic conditions through next-generation sequencing.
Hong S; Wang L; Zhao D; Zhang Y; Chen Y; Tan J; Liang L; Zhu T
Mol Genet Genomic Med; 2019 Jun; 7(6):e684. PubMed ID: 30968598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Review of Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing.
Yohe S; Thyagarajan B
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2017 Nov; 141(11):1544-1557. PubMed ID: 28782984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnostic gene sequencing panels: from design to report-a technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).
Bean LJH; Funke B; Carlston CM; Gannon JL; Kantarci S; Krock BL; Zhang S; Bayrak-Toydemir P;
Genet Med; 2020 Mar; 22(3):453-461. PubMed ID: 31732716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [More specific analyses in neonatal screening using DNA techniques].
Larsson A
Lakartidningen; 2002 Apr; 99(17):1927-8. PubMed ID: 12043414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Next-generation sequencing and its applications in molecular diagnostics.
Su Z; Ning B; Fang H; Hong H; Perkins R; Tong W; Shi L
Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2011 Apr; 11(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 21463242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Amplification of overlapping DNA amplicons in a single-tube multiplex PCR for targeted next-generation sequencing of BRCA1 and BRCA2.
Schenk D; Song G; Ke Y; Wang Z
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181062. PubMed ID: 28704513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of next-generation sequencing on diagnosis and management of neurometabolic disorders: current advances and future perspectives.
Tarailo-Graovac M; Wasserman WW; Van Karnebeek CD
Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2017 Apr; 17(4):307-309. PubMed ID: 28277145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Targeted Re-Sequencing Emulsion PCR Panel for Myopathies: Results in 94 Cases.
Punetha J; Kesari A; Uapinyoying P; Giri M; Clarke NF; Waddell LB; North KN; Ghaoui R; O'Grady GL; Oates EC; Sandaradura SA; Bönnemann CG; Donkervoort S; Plotz PH; Smith EC; Tesi-Rocha C; Bertorini TE; Tarnopolsky MA; Reitter B; Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz I; Hoffman EP
J Neuromuscul Dis; 2016 May; 3(2):209-225. PubMed ID: 27854218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Detection of 16S rRNA and KPC Genes from Complex Matrix Utilizing a Molecular Inversion Probe Assay for Next-Generation Sequencing.
Stefan CP; Hall AT; Minogue TD
Sci Rep; 2018 Feb; 8(1):2028. PubMed ID: 29391471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Diagnostic Genetic Testing for Monogenic Diabetes and Congenital Hyperinsulinemia.
Houghton JAL
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2076():129-177. PubMed ID: 31586326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pitfalls in variant annotation for hereditary cancer diagnostics: The example of Illumina® VariantStudio®.
Kalfakakou D; Konstantopoulou I; Yannoukakos D; Fostira F
Genomics; 2021 Jan; 113(1 Pt 2):748-754. PubMed ID: 33053411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of CNV detection tools for NGS panel data in genetic diagnostics.
Moreno-Cabrera JM; Del Valle J; Castellanos E; Feliubadaló L; Pineda M; Brunet J; Serra E; Capellà G; Lázaro C; Gel B
Eur J Hum Genet; 2020 Dec; 28(12):1645-1655. PubMed ID: 32561899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Anophthalmia including next-generation sequencing-based approaches.
Harding P; Brooks BP; FitzPatrick D; Moosajee M
Eur J Hum Genet; 2020 Mar; 28(3):388-398. PubMed ID: 31358957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [New developments in molecularbiological diagnostic].
Mannhalter C
Hamostaseologie; 2017 May; 37(2):138-151. PubMed ID: 28405674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Multicenter Evaluation of a Novel Automated Rapid Detection System of BRAF Status in Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissues.
Schiefer AI; Parlow L; Gabler L; Mesteri I; Koperek O; von Deimling A; Streubel B; Preusser M; Lehmann A; Kellner U; Pauwels P; Lambin S; Dietel M; Hummel M; Klauschen F; Birner P; Möbs M
J Mol Diagn; 2016 May; 18(3):370-377. PubMed ID: 26921540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
