BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29139591)

  • 1. MR imaging appearance of noncalcified and calcified DCIS.
    Scott-Moncrieff A; Sullivan ME; Mendelson EB; Wang L
    Breast J; 2018 May; 24(3):343-349. PubMed ID: 29139591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic and morphologic MR characteristics compared with mammographic appearance and nuclear grade.
    Jansen SA; Newstead GM; Abe H; Shimauchi A; Schmidt RA; Karczmar GS
    Radiology; 2007 Dec; 245(3):684-91. PubMed ID: 18024450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
    Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Image-guided core breast biopsy of ductal carcinoma in situ presenting as a non-calcified abnormality.
    DiPiro PJ; Meyer JE; Denison CM; Frenna TH; Harvey SC; Smith DN
    Eur J Radiol; 1999 Jun; 30(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 10452723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening-detected calcified and non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: differences in the imaging and histopathological features.
    Mun HS; Shin HJ; Kim HH; Cha JH; Kim H
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Jan; 68(1):e27-35. PubMed ID: 23177096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of contrast-enhanced mammography in the preoperative detection of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breasts: a comparison with low-energy image and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Wang L; Wang P; Shao H; Li J; Yang Q
    Eur Radiol; 2024 May; 34(5):3342-3351. PubMed ID: 37853174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Apocrine Metaplasia Found at MR Biopsy: Is There Something to be Learned?
    Gao Y; Dialani V; DeBenedectis C; Johnson N; Brachtel E; Slanetz P
    Breast J; 2017 Jul; 23(4):429-435. PubMed ID: 28079289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer-aided heterogeneity analysis in breast MR imaging assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ: Correlating histologic grade and receptor status.
    Chou SS; Gombos EC; Chikarmane SA; Giess CS; Jayender J
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1748-1759. PubMed ID: 28371110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noncalcified ductal carcinoma in situ: imaging and histologic findings in 36 tumors.
    Kim JH; Ko ES; Kim DY; Han H; Sohn JH; Choe DH
    J Ultrasound Med; 2009 Jul; 28(7):903-10. PubMed ID: 19546332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI reveals the extent and the microvascular pattern of breast ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Santamaría G; Velasco M; Farrús B; Caparrós FX; Fernández PL
    Breast J; 2013; 19(4):402-10. PubMed ID: 23758454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of magnetic resonance computer-aided diagnosis for preoperatively determining invasive disease in ultrasonography-guided core needle biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Ahn HS; Kim SM; Kim MS; Jang M; Yun B; Kang E; Kim EK; Park SY; Kim B
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jul; 99(31):e21257. PubMed ID: 32756104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of Preoperative Breast MR Imaging and MR-guided Surgery on Diagnosis and Surgical Outcome of Women with Invasive Breast Cancer with and without DCIS Component.
    Kuhl CK; Strobel K; Bieling H; Wardelmann E; Kuhn W; Maass N; Schrading S
    Radiology; 2017 Sep; 284(3):645-655. PubMed ID: 28445683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preoperative Breast MRI for Newly Diagnosed Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Imaging Features and Performance in a Multicenter Setting (ECOG-ACRIN E4112 Trial).
    Chou SS; Romanoff J; Lehman CD; Khan SA; Carlos R; Badve SS; Xiao J; Corsetti RL; Javid SH; Spell DW; Han LK; Sabol JL; Bumberry JR; Gareen IF; Snyder BS; Gatsonis C; Wagner LI; Wolff AC; Miller KD; Sparano JA; Comstock CE; Rahbar H
    Radiology; 2021 Oct; 301(1):66-77. PubMed ID: 34342501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Qualitative Radiogenomics: Association Between BI-RADS Calcification Descriptors and Recurrence Risk as Assessed by the Oncotype DX Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Score.
    Woodard GA; Price ER
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Apr; 212(4):919-924. PubMed ID: 30714832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) Diagnosed by MRI-Guided Biopsy among
    Faermann R; Friedman E; Kaidar-Person O; Weidenfeld J; Brodsky M; Shalmon A; Halshtok Neiman O; Gotlieb M; Yagil Y; Samoocha D; Madorsky Feldman D; Sklair-Levy M
    Breast J; 2022; 2022():4317693. PubMed ID: 36349178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mammographic morphology and distribution of calcifications in ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed in organized screening.
    Hofvind S; Iversen BF; Eriksen L; Styr BM; Kjellevold K; Kurz KD
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Jun; 52(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 21498306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A mass on breast imaging predicts coexisting invasive carcinoma in patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ.
    King TA; Farr GH; Cederbom GJ; Smetherman DH; Bolton JS; Stolier AJ; Fuhrman GM
    Am Surg; 2001 Sep; 67(9):907-12. PubMed ID: 11565774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared to Mammography in the Preoperative Detection and Measurement of Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Retrospective Analysis.
    Preibsch H; Beckmann J; Pawlowski J; Kloth C; Hahn M; Staebler A; Wietek BM; Nikolaou K; Wiesinger B
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):760-765. PubMed ID: 30149976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of clinicopathological features on the predictive accuracy of conventional breast imaging in determining the extent of screen-detected high-grade pure ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Hayward L; Oeppen RS; Grima AV; Royle GT; Rubin CM; Cutress RI
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2011 Jul; 93(5):385-90. PubMed ID: 21943463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High grade and non-high grade ductal carcinoma in situ on dynamic MR mammography: characteristic findings for signal increase and morphological pattern of enhancement.
    Neubauer H; Li M; Kuehne-Heid R; Schneider A; Kaiser WA
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Jan; 76(901):3-12. PubMed ID: 12595319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.