160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29139591)
21. Radiologic-pathologic correlation of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Yamada T; Mori N; Watanabe M; Kimijima I; Okumoto T; Seiji K; Takahashi S
Radiographics; 2010 Sep; 30(5):1183-98. PubMed ID: 20833844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Differentiation of ductal carcinoma in-situ from benign micro-calcifications by dedicated breast computed tomography.
Aminololama-Shakeri S; Abbey CK; Gazi P; Prionas ND; Nosratieh A; Li CS; Boone JM; Lindfors KK
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):297-303. PubMed ID: 26520874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. MRI findings of cancers preoperatively diagnosed as pure DCIS at core needle biopsy.
Huang YT; Cheung YC; Lo YF; Ueng SH; Kuo WL; Chen SC
Acta Radiol; 2011 Dec; 52(10):1064-8. PubMed ID: 21969708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Preoperative MRI of pure intraductal breast carcinoma--a valuable adjunct to mammography in assessing cancer extent.
Santamaría G; Velasco M; Farrús B; Zanón G; Fernández PL
Breast; 2008 Apr; 17(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 17964786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [The role of breast magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ].
Nadrljanski M; Milosević Z; Plesinac-Karapandzić V; Goldner B
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2013; 141(5-6):402-8. PubMed ID: 23858817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Imaging Features of Patients Undergoing Active Surveillance for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ.
Grimm LJ; Ghate SV; Hwang ES; Soo MS
Acad Radiol; 2017 Nov; 24(11):1364-1371. PubMed ID: 28705686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Preoperative clinicopathologic factors and breast magnetic resonance imaging features can predict ductal carcinoma in situ with invasive components.
Lee CW; Wu HK; Lai HW; Wu WP; Chen ST; Chen DR; Chen CJ; Kuo SJ
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):780-9. PubMed ID: 26971424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Lesion size is a major determinant of the mammographic features of ductal carcinoma in situ: findings from the Sloane project.
Evans A; Clements K; Maxwell A; Bishop H; Hanby A; Lawrence G; Pinder SE;
Clin Radiol; 2010 Mar; 65(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 20152272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Mammographically non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: sonographic features with pathological correlation in 35 patients.
Mesurolle B; El-Khoury M; Khetani K; Abdullah N; Joseph L; Kao E
Clin Radiol; 2009 Jun; 64(6):628-36. PubMed ID: 19414087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Histopathological characteristics of breast ductal carcinoma in situ and association with imaging findings.
Tang X; Yamashita T; Hara M; Kumaki N; Tokuda Y; Masuda S
Breast Cancer; 2016 May; 23(3):491-8. PubMed ID: 25644245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Value of breast MRI for patients with a biopsy showing atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH).
Tsuchiya K; Mori N; Schacht DV; Sheth D; Karczmar GS; Newstead GM; Abe H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1738-1747. PubMed ID: 28295791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. US appearance of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Wang LC; Sullivan M; Du H; Feldman MI; Mendelson EB
Radiographics; 2013; 33(1):213-28. PubMed ID: 23322838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Background parenchymal signal enhancement ratio at preoperative MR imaging: association with subsequent local recurrence in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ after breast conservation surgery.
Kim SA; Cho N; Ryu EB; Seo M; Bae MS; Chang JM; Moon WK
Radiology; 2014 Mar; 270(3):699-707. PubMed ID: 24126372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinics in diagnostic imaging (180). Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
Tan EJ; Moey T; Madhukumar P; Leong LC
Singapore Med J; 2017 Oct; 58(10):585-592. PubMed ID: 29119195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breasts: review of MR imaging features.
Greenwood HI; Heller SL; Kim S; Sigmund EE; Shaylor SD; Moy L
Radiographics; 2013 Oct; 33(6):1569-88. PubMed ID: 24108552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accuracy of 3 T versus 1.5 T breast MRI for pre-operative assessment of extent of disease in newly diagnosed DCIS.
Rahbar H; DeMartini WB; Lee AY; Partridge SC; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Apr; 84(4):611-6. PubMed ID: 25604909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: ultrasound and mammographic findings correlated with histological findings.
Cho KR; Seo BK; Kim CH; Whang KW; Kim YH; Kim BH; Woo OH; Lee YH; Chung KB
Yonsei Med J; 2008 Feb; 49(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 18306476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Pathologic-radiologic correlations in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: findings of the Singapore breast screening project.
Tan PH; Ho JT; Ng EH; Chiang GS; Low SC; Ng FC; Bay BH
Int J Cancer; 2000 Aug; 90(4):231-6. PubMed ID: 10993963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Sensitivity of breast MRI for ductal carcinoma in situ appearing as microcalcifications only on mammography.
Rinaldi P; Buccheri C; Giuliani M; Bufi E; Romani M; Patrolecco F; Belli P; Bonomo L
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(6):1207-1212. PubMed ID: 27618803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
