These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29140067)

  • 1. First Amendment Limits on Compulsory Speech.
    Barrella N
    Food Drug Law J; 2016; 71(3):519-43. PubMed ID: 29140067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual gut punch: persuasion, emotion, and the constitutional meaning of graphic disclosure.
    Goodman EP
    Cornell Law Rev; 2014; 99(3):513-69. PubMed ID: 24745102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Spoonful of (Added) Sugar Helps the Constitution Go Down: Curing the Compelled Speech Commercial Speech Doctrine with FDA’s Added Sugars Rule.
    Smith C
    Food Drug Law J; 2016; 71(3):442-81. PubMed ID: 29140065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. FDA-Required Tobacco Product Inserts & Onserts–and the First Amendment.
    Lindblom EN; Berman ML; Thrasher JF
    Food Drug Law J; 2017; 72(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 29140651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compelled commercial speech: the Food and Drug Administration's effort to smoke out the tobacco industry through graphic warning labels.
    Haynes BM; Andrews AH; Jacob CR
    Food Drug Law J; 2013; 68(4):329-56, i. PubMed ID: 24552078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A matter of context: Casey and the constitutionality of compelled physician speech.
    Gaylord SW
    J Law Med Ethics; 2015; 43(1):35-50. PubMed ID: 25846037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Graphic Cigarette Warning Labels, the First Amendment, and Public Right to Accurate Public Health Information: Graphic Cigarette Warning Labels Back Under Legal Scrutiny.
    Curfman G
    JAMA Health Forum; 2021 Sep; 2(9):e212886. PubMed ID: 36218662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. United States: Protecting Commercial Speech under the First Amendment.
    Pomeranz JL
    J Law Med Ethics; 2022; 50(2):265-275. PubMed ID: 35894570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outstanding Questions In First Amendment Law Related To Food Labeling Disclosure Requirements For Health.
    Pomeranz JL
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2015 Nov; 34(11):1986-92. PubMed ID: 26526259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. FDA preemption of drug and device labeling: who should decide what goes on a drug label?
    Valoir T; Ghosh S
    Health Matrix Clevel; 2011; 21(2):555-98. PubMed ID: 22145525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Snake oil salesmen or purveyors of knowledge: off-label promotions and the commercial speech doctrine.
    Bagley CE; Mitts J; Tinsley RJ
    Cornell J Law Public Policy; 2013; 23(2):337-93. PubMed ID: 25330567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. From Research Conclusions to Real Change: Understanding the First Amendment's (Non)Response to the Negative Effects of Media on Children by Looking to the Example of Violent Video Game Regulations.
    Knake RN
    SMU Law Rev; 2010; 63(4):1197-1236. PubMed ID: 30027726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act and the First Amendment: why a substantial interest in protecting public health won't save some new restrictions on tobacco advertising.
    Stoll E
    Food Drug Law J; 2010; 65(4):873-900, iii. PubMed ID: 24479250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When the First Amendment and public health collide: the Court's increasingly strict constitutional scrutiny of health regulations that restrict commercial speech.
    Rauer S
    Am J Law Med; 2012; 38(4):690-712. PubMed ID: 23356100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of legal and scientific issues in court challenges to graphic tobacco warnings.
    Kraemer JD; Baig SA
    Am J Prev Med; 2013 Sep; 45(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 23953361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new test for evaluating Eighth Amendment challenges to lethal injections.
    Harv Law Rev; 2007 Mar; 120(5):1301-23. PubMed ID: 17410679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Commercial speech and off-label drug uses: what role for wide acceptance, general recognition and research incentives?
    Gilhooley M
    Am J Law Med; 2011; 37(2-3):258-77. PubMed ID: 21847881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The First Amendment and federal court deference to the Food and Drug Administration: The Times They Are A-Changin'.
    Basile EM; Gross M
    Food Drug Law J; 2004; 59(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 15190924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Public Health and the First Amendment.
    Sharfstein JM
    Milbank Q; 2015 Sep; 93(3):459-62. PubMed ID: 26350923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.