These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29140098)

  • 21. Effects of toothbrushing on surface characteristics of microhybrid and nanofilled resin composites following different finishing and polishing procedures.
    Daud A; Adams AJ; Shawkat A; Gray G; Wilson NHF; Lynch CD; Blum IR
    J Dent; 2020 Aug; 99():103376. PubMed ID: 32470566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Techniques on the Surface Roughness and the Color of Nanocomposite Resin Restorative Materials.
    Avsar A; Yuzbasioglu E; Sarac D
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2015; 24(5):881-90. PubMed ID: 26768641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites.
    Da Costa J; Ferracane J; Paravina RD; Mazur RF; Roeder L
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(4):214-24; discussion 225-6. PubMed ID: 17635330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of four different finishing and polishing systems on resin composites: roughness surface and gloss retention evaluations.
    Tosco V; Monterubbianesi R; Orilisi G; Procaccini M; Grandini S; Putignano A; Orsini G
    Minerva Stomatol; 2020 Aug; 69(4):207-214. PubMed ID: 31633320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Conventional polishing techniques versus a nanofilled surface sealer: preliminary findings regarding surface roughness changes and analysis.
    Jefferies SR; Boston DW
    J Clin Dent; 2010; 21(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 20527508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials.
    Türkün LS; Türkün M
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 15088733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Surface roughness of light-activated glass-ionomer cement restorative materials after finishing.
    St Germain HA; Meiers JC
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 9002869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of polishing systems on stain susceptibility and surface roughness of nanocomposite resin material.
    Barakah HM; Taher NM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):625-31. PubMed ID: 24721503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of Finishing Procedures on the Surface Roughness of Resin-modified Glass-Ionomer Materials.
    Garshasb M; Santos GC; Rizkalla AS; Bohay R; Santos MJ
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2017 Jul; 38(7):e1-e4. PubMed ID: 28727468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of different staining beverages on color stability, surface roughness and microhardness of silorane and methacrylate-based composite resins.
    Karaman E; Tuncer D; Firat E; Ozdemir OS; Karahan S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 May; 15(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 25307814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Finishing and polishing of indirect composite and ceramic inlays in-vivo: occlusal surfaces.
    Jung M; Wehlen O; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 15088723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Three-dimensional surface profile analysis of different types of flowable restorative resins following different finishing protocols.
    Yazici AR; Müftü A; Kugel G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jul; 8(5):9-17. PubMed ID: 17618325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Surface geometry of three packable and one hybrid composite after polishing.
    Jung M; Bruegger H; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):816-24. PubMed ID: 14653299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Flexural Properties and Polished Surface Characteristics of a Structural Colored Resin Composite.
    Mizutani K; Takamizawa T; Ishii R; Shibasaki S; Kurokawa H; Suzuki M; Tsujimoto A; Miyazaki M
    Oper Dent; 2021 May; 46(3):E117-E131. PubMed ID: 34370032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Surface roughness of new microhybrid resin-based composites.
    Gedik R; Hürmüzlü F; Coşkun A; Bektaş OO; Ozdemir AK
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Aug; 136(8):1106-12. PubMed ID: 16161365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Abrasive wear of resin composites as related to finishing and polishing procedures.
    Turssi CP; Ferracane JL; Serra MC
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jul; 21(7):641-8. PubMed ID: 15978273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Finishing systems on the final surface roughness of composites.
    Koh R; Neiva G; Dennison J; Yaman P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 18264536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The efficiency of a new polishing material: nanotechnology liquid polish.
    Atabek D; Sillelioglu H; Olmez A
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):362-9. PubMed ID: 20533638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin.
    Walter R; Boushell LW; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Chung Y; Swift EJ
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 24344912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of six polishing systems on the surface roughness of two packable resin-based composites.
    Reis AF; Giannini M; Lovadino JR; dos Santos Dias CT
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 12469758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.