These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29140098)

  • 41. Surface roughness of one nanofill and one silorane composite after polishing.
    Buchgraber B; Kqiku L; Allmer N; Jakopic G; Städtler P
    Coll Antropol; 2011 Sep; 35(3):879-83. PubMed ID: 22053571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites.
    Gönülol N; Yilmaz F
    J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40 Suppl 2():e64-70. PubMed ID: 22819955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effects of polishing techniques on the surface roughness of acrylic denture base resins.
    Kuhar M; Funduk N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 15624002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing.
    Senawongse P; Pongprueksa P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(5):265-73; discussion 274-5. PubMed ID: 17877626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The effect of polishing techniques on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins.
    Sarac D; Sarac YS; Kulunk S; Ural C; Kulunk T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jul; 96(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 16872928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Surface roughness of glass-ceramic insert-composite restorations: assessing several polishing techniques.
    Ashe MJ; Tripp GA; Eichmiller FC; George LA; Meiers JC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Oct; 127(10):1495-500. PubMed ID: 8908919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of new tooth-coloured restoratives.
    Ozgünaltay G; Yazici AR; Görücü J
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Feb; 30(2):218-24. PubMed ID: 12535151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of two-step versus four-step composite finishing/polishing disc systems: evaluation of a new two-step composite polishing disc system.
    da Costa JB; Goncalves F; Ferracane JL
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 21702670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Surface roughness of various packable composites.
    Ryba TM; Dunn WJ; Murchison DF
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 12022454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of dental finishing instruments on the surface roughness of composite resins as elucidated by atomic force microscopy.
    Botta AC; Duarte S; Paulin Filho PI; Gheno SM
    Microsc Microanal; 2008 Oct; 14(5):380-6. PubMed ID: 18793482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Polishing methods of an alumina-reinforced feldspar ceramic.
    Bottino MC; Valandro LF; Kantorski KZ; Bressiani JC; Bottino MA
    Braz Dent J; 2006; 17(4):285-9. PubMed ID: 17262140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Repair of dimethacrylate-based composite restorations by a silorane-based composite: a one-year randomized clinical trial.
    Popoff DA; Santa Rosa TT; Ferreira RC; Magalhães CS; Moreira AN; Mjör IA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):E1-10. PubMed ID: 22616930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion.
    Aykent F; Yondem I; Ozyesil AG; Gunal SK; Avunduk MC; Ozkan S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 20362765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Three-dimensional evaluation of surface roughness of resin composites after finishing and polishing.
    Nair VS; Sainudeen S; Padmanabhan P; Vijayashankar LV; Sujathan U; Pillai R
    J Conserv Dent; 2016; 19(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 26957802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effect of polishing technique on 3-D surface roughness and gloss of dental restorative resin composites.
    Ereifej NS; Oweis YG; Eliades G
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(1):E1-12. PubMed ID: 22917441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology.
    Ilie N; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2011 Apr; 27(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 21194743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Microleakage and microtensile bond strength of silorane-based and dimethacrylate-based restorative systems.
    Santos MJ; Podorieszach A; Rizkalla AS; Santos GC
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013; 34 Spec No 8():19-24. PubMed ID: 24568172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effectiveness of diamond-impregnated felt wheels for polishing a hybrid composite.
    Jung M; Baumstieger M; Klimek J
    Clin Oral Investig; 1997 Jun; 1(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 9552821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Color Stability and Surface Roughness of Composite submitted to Different Types and Periods of Finishing/Polishing: Physical Properties of Composites.
    de Morais RC; Garcia Lda F; Cruvinel DR; Panzeri Pires-de-Souza Fde C
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Jul; 16(7):565-70. PubMed ID: 26329412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Surface finish produced on three resin composites by new polishing systems.
    St-Georges AJ; Bolla M; Fortin D; Muller-Bolla M; Thompson JY; Stamatiades PJ
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):593-7. PubMed ID: 16268393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.