255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29140117)
1. Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality of Abdominopelvic CT Using Iterative (AIDR 3D) and Conventional Reconstructions.
Mello-Amoedo CD; Martins AN; Tachibana A; Pinho DF; Baroni RH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):127-133. PubMed ID: 29140117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) 3D on low-dose abdominal CT: comparison with routine-dose CT using filtered back projection.
Matsuki M; Murakami T; Juri H; Yoshikawa S; Narumi Y
Acta Radiol; 2013 Oct; 54(8):869-75. PubMed ID: 23761554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Image Quality and Lesion Detection on Deep Learning Reconstruction and Iterative Reconstruction of Submillisievert Chest and Abdominal CT.
Singh R; Digumarthy SR; Muse VV; Kambadakone AR; Blake MA; Tabari A; Hoi Y; Akino N; Angel E; Madan R; Kalra MK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):566-573. PubMed ID: 31967501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D integrated with automatic tube current modulation in radiation dose and image noise reduction compared with filtered-back projection for 80-kVp abdominal CT: Anthropomorphic phantom and patient study.
Chen CM; Lin YY; Hsu MY; Hung CF; Liao YL; Tsai HY
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1666-72. PubMed ID: 27501904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dose reduction in chest CT: comparison of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D, adaptive iterative dose reduction, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Hosokawa T; Tanami Y; Sugiura H; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):4185-95. PubMed ID: 22883532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimizing image quality for pediatric torso computed tomography: the use of advanced iterative reconstruction and wide-detector scanning techniques.
Buchmann RF; Bruce Greenberg S
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(5):786-9. PubMed ID: 24943252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Standard dose versus low-dose abdominal and pelvic CT: comparison between filtered back projection versus adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D.
Gervaise A; Osemont B; Louis M; Lecocq S; Teixeira P; Blum A
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014 Jan; 95(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 23988483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Survey of Radiation Doses in CT Urography Before and After Implementation of Iterative Reconstruction.
van der Molen AJ; Miclea RL; Geleijns J; Joemai RM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):572-7. PubMed ID: 26295643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality.
Shuman WP; Chan KT; Busey JM; Mitsumori LM; Choi E; Koprowicz KM; Kanal KM
Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 25170546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic Performance and Dose Comparison of Filtered Back Projection and Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction Three-dimensional CT Enterography in Children and Young Adults.
Wallihan DB; Podberesky DJ; Sullivan J; Denson LA; Zhang B; Salisbury SR; Towbin AJ
Radiology; 2015 Jul; 276(1):233-42. PubMed ID: 25654668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hybrid Type iterative reconstruction method vs. filter back projection method: Capability for radiation dose reduction and perfusion assessment on dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced perfusion chest area-detector CT.
Ohno Y; Koyama H; Fujisawa Y; Yoshikawa T; Inokawa H; Sugihara N; Seki S; Sugimura K
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):164-175. PubMed ID: 26724662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Forward-Projected Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction in Screening Low-Dose Chest CT: Comparison With Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D.
Hassani C; Ronco A; Prosper AE; Dissanayake S; Cen SY; Lee C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):548-556. PubMed ID: 30040468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Impact of Different Levels of Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D on Image Quality of 320-Row Coronary CT Angiography: A Clinical Trial.
Feger S; Rief M; Zimmermann E; Martus P; Schuijf JD; Blobel J; Richter F; Dewey M
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125943. PubMed ID: 25945924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low-Dose Pelvic Computed Tomography Using Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3-Dimensional Algorithm: A Phantom Study.
Onishi H; Kockelkoren R; Kim T; Hori M; Nakamoto A; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Uranishi A; Tanaka T; Taniguchi A; Enchi Y; Satoh K; Tomiyama N
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):629-34. PubMed ID: 26125298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adaptive iterative dose reduction using 3D processing for reduced- and low-dose pulmonary CT: comparison with standard-dose CT for image noise reduction and radiological findings.
Ohno Y; Takenaka D; Kanda T; Yoshikawa T; Matsumoto S; Sugihara N; Sugimura K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Oct; 199(4):W477-85. PubMed ID: 22997397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reducing CT radiation exposure with organ effective modulation: A retrospective clinical study.
Akai H; Kiryu S; Shibata E; Maeda E; Sato J; Tomizawa N; Nojima M; Ohtomo K
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1569-73. PubMed ID: 27501890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D and filtered back projection in craniocervical CT angiography.
Yu S; Zhang L; Zheng J; Xu Y; Chen Y; Song Z
Clin Radiol; 2017 Jan; 72(1):96.e1-96.e6. PubMed ID: 27647546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of the forward-projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution algorithm on image quality and radiation dose in pediatric cardiac computed tomography.
Nishiyama Y; Tada K; Nishiyama Y; Mori H; Maruyama M; Katsube T; Yamamoto N; Kanayama H; Yamamoto Y; Kitagaki H
Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Nov; 46(12):1663-1670. PubMed ID: 27531216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D versus filtered back projection in CT: evaluation of image quality.
Joemai RM; Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Hernandez-Giron I; Geleijns J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Dec; 201(6):1291-7. PubMed ID: 24261369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improvement of image quality and dose management in CT fluoroscopy by iterative 3D image reconstruction.
Grosser OS; Wybranski C; Kupitz D; Powerski M; Mohnike K; Pech M; Amthauer H; Ricke J
Eur Radiol; 2017 Sep; 27(9):3625-3634. PubMed ID: 28168371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
