These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29140837)
1. Disruption of Biofilms and Neutralization of Bacteria Using Hypochlorous Acid Solution: An In Vivo and In Vitro Evaluation. Day A; Alkhalil A; Carney BC; Hoffman HN; Moffatt LT; Shupp JW Adv Skin Wound Care; 2017 Dec; 30(12):543-551. PubMed ID: 29140837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In Vitro Evaluation of a Hypochlorous Acid Hygiene Solution on Established Biofilms. Romanowski EG; Stella NA; Yates KA; Brothers KM; Kowalski RP; Shanks RMQ Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Nov; 44 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S187-S191. PubMed ID: 29369234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cadexomer iodine provides superior efficacy against bacterial wound biofilms in vitro and in vivo. Fitzgerald DJ; Renick PJ; Forrest EC; Tetens SP; Earnest DN; McMillan J; Kiedaisch BM; Shi L; Roche ED Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Jan; 25(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 27859922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Povidone-iodine ointment demonstrates in vitro efficacy against biofilm formation. Hoekstra MJ; Westgate SJ; Mueller S Int Wound J; 2017 Feb; 14(1):172-179. PubMed ID: 26968574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative efficacies of topical antiseptic eardrops against biofilms from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and quinolone-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Youn CK; Jun Y; Jo ER; Jang SJ; Song H; Cho SI J Laryngol Otol; 2018 Jun; 132(6):519-522. PubMed ID: 29909794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 0.01% Hypochlorous Acid as an Alternative Skin Antiseptic: An In Vitro Comparison. Anagnostopoulos AG; Rong A; Miller D; Tran AQ; Head T; Lee MC; Lee WW Dermatol Surg; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1489-1493. PubMed ID: 29985866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The in vitro antimicrobial activity of wound and skin cleansers at nontoxic concentrations. Rani SA; Hoon R; Najafi RR; Khosrovi B; Wang L; Debabov D Adv Skin Wound Care; 2014 Feb; 27(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 24440863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dealing with biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus: In vitro evaluation of a novel aerosol formulation of silver sulfadiazine. Moyano AJ; Mas CR; Colque CA; Smania AM Burns; 2020 Feb; 46(1):128-135. PubMed ID: 31420266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of Wound Cleansers on Wound-Specific Organisms Using In Vitro and Ex Vivo Biofilm Models. McMahon RE; Salamone AB; Poleon S; Bionda N; Salamone JC Wound Manag Prev; 2020 Nov; 66(11):31-42. PubMed ID: 33206627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modelling antisepsis using defined populations of facultative and anaerobic wound pathogens grown in a basally perfused biofilm model. Oates A; Lindsay S; Mistry H; Ortega F; McBain AJ Biofouling; 2018 May; 34(5):507-518. PubMed ID: 29873244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A New Acid-oxidizing Solution: Assessment of Its Role on Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Biofilm Morphological Changes. D'Atanasio N; Capezzone de Joannon A; Mangano G; Meloni M; Giarratana N; Milanese C; Tongiani S Wounds; 2015 Oct; 27(10):265-73. PubMed ID: 26479210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of common antiseptic solutions against clinically relevant microorganisms in biofilm. O'Donnell JA; Wu M; Cochrane NH; Belay E; Myntti MF; James GA; Ryan SP; Seyler TM Bone Joint J; 2021 May; 103-B(5):908-915. PubMed ID: 33934664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Photodynamic antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of RLP068/Cl against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa forming biofilms on prosthetic material. Vassena C; Fenu S; Giuliani F; Fantetti L; Roncucci G; Simonutti G; Romanò CL; De Francesco R; Drago L Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2014 Jul; 44(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 24933446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Antimicrobial efficacy of a very stable hypochlorous acid formula compared with other antiseptics used in treating wounds: in-vitro study on micro-organisms with or without biofilm. Herruzo R; Herruzo I J Hosp Infect; 2020 Jun; 105(2):289-294. PubMed ID: 31987843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of a non-medicated wound dressing on attached and biofilm encased bacteria: laboratory and clinical evidence. Rippon MG; Rogers AA; Sellars L; Styles KM; Westgate S J Wound Care; 2018 Mar; 27(3):146-155. PubMed ID: 29509112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inhibition of biofilms by glucose oxidase, lactoperoxidase and guaiacol: the active antibacterial component in an enzyme alginogel. Cooper RA Int Wound J; 2013 Dec; 10(6):630-7. PubMed ID: 23672196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Antimicrobial effects of a multimodal wound matrix against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an in vitro and an in vivo porcine wound model. Gil J; Solis M; Strong R; Cassagnol R; Jozic I; Davis SC Int Wound J; 2024 Oct; 21(10):e70059. PubMed ID: 39359044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sodium hypochlorite is more effective than chlorhexidine for eradication of bacterial biofilm of staphylococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Röhner E; Jacob B; Böhle S; Rohe S; Löffler B; Matziolis G; Zippelius T Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 Dec; 28(12):3912-3918. PubMed ID: 32034427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy on antibiotic-resistant staphylococcal biofilm: an in vitro study. Li X; Guo H; Tian Q; Zheng G; Hu Y; Fu Y; Tan H J Surg Res; 2013 Oct; 184(2):1013-21. PubMed ID: 23622723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of a novel, antimicrobial dressing on in vivo, Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound biofilm: quantitative comparative analysis using a rabbit ear model. Seth AK; Zhong A; Nguyen KT; Hong SJ; Leung KP; Galiano RD; Mustoe TA Wound Repair Regen; 2014; 22(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 25230854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]