287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29141363)
1. [Characteristics of high resolution diffusion weighted imaging apparent diffusion coefficient histogram and its correlations with cancer stages in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma].
Wang GJ; Wang Y; Ye Y; Chen F; Lu YT; Li SL
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 97(41):3244-3249. PubMed ID: 29141363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis imaging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Correlation between quantitative parameters and clinical stage.
Xu XQ; Ma G; Wang YJ; Hu H; Su GY; Shi HB; Wu FY
Oncotarget; 2017 Jul; 8(29):47230-47238. PubMed ID: 28525383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differentiation between nasopharyngeal carcinoma and lymphoma at the primary site using whole-tumor histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps.
Lian S; Zhang C; Chi J; Huang Y; Shi F; Xie C
Radiol Med; 2020 Jul; 125(7):647-653. PubMed ID: 32072391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0 T in urinary bladder lesions: correlation with pathologic findings.
Suo ST; Chen XX; Fan Y; Wu LM; Yao QY; Cao MQ; Liu Q; Xu JR
Acad Radiol; 2014 Aug; 21(8):1027-34. PubMed ID: 24833566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The prognostic value of pretreatment tumor apparent diffusion coefficient values in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Yan DF; Zhang WB; Ke SB; Zhao F; Yan SX; Wang QD; Teng LS
BMC Cancer; 2017 Oct; 17(1):678. PubMed ID: 29020937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [High resolution diffusion-weighted imaging for characterising nasopharyngeal carcinoma].
Wang Y; Wang GJ; Ye Y; Lu YT; Wu WH; Li SL
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 May; 97(17):1303-1306. PubMed ID: 28482430
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-small cell lung cancer: Whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient for assessment of tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion and pleural invasion.
Tsuchiya N; Doai M; Usuda K; Uramoto H; Tonami H
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172433. PubMed ID: 28207858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Discussion of correlation between histogram analysis of quantitative diffusion weighted imaging and Gleason score of prostate cancer].
Wen R; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Gu YF; Li MJ; Zhang YY; Shen JK
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 99(11):823-828. PubMed ID: 30893724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Investigation of volumetric apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis for assessing complete response and clinical outcomes following pre-operative chemoradiation treatment for rectal carcinoma.
Chidambaram V; Brierley JD; Cummings B; Bhayana R; Menezes RJ; Kennedy ED; Kirsch R; Jhaveri KS
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 May; 42(5):1310-1318. PubMed ID: 28004138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient with uterine cervical pathologic finding.
Lin Y; Li H; Chen Z; Ni P; Zhong Q; Huang H; Sandrasegaran K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 May; 204(5):1125-31. PubMed ID: 25905952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment Response Prediction of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Based on Histogram Analysis of Diffusional Kurtosis Imaging.
Tu N; Zhong Y; Wang X; Xing F; Chen L; Wu G
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):326-333. PubMed ID: 30630832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient map of diffusion-weighted MRI in endometrial cancer: a preliminary correlation study with histological grade.
Woo S; Cho JY; Kim SY; Kim SH
Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1270-7. PubMed ID: 24316663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps for assessing thymic epithelial tumours: correlation with world health organization classification and clinical staging.
Kong LY; Zhang W; Zhou Y; Xu H; Shi HB; Feng Q; Xu XQ; Yu TF
Br J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 91(1084):20170580. PubMed ID: 29260882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histogram analysis parameters identify multiple associations between DWI and DCE MRI in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Meyer HJ; Leifels L; Schob S; Garnov N; Surov A
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jan; 45():72-77. PubMed ID: 28963049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis: significance in T and N staging of gastric cancers.
Liu S; Zhang Y; Chen L; Guan W; Guan Y; Ge Y; He J; Zhou Z
BMC Cancer; 2017 Oct; 17(1):665. PubMed ID: 28969606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical lymphadenopathy: can the histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient help to differentiate between lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma in patients with unknown clinical primary tumor?
Vidiri A; Minosse S; Piludu F; Pellini R; Cristalli G; Kayal R; Carlino G; Renzi D; Covello R; Marzi S
Radiol Med; 2019 Jan; 124(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 30196522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pituitary macroadenoma: Accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient magnetic resonance imaging in grading tumor aggressiveness.
Doai M; Tonami H; Matoba M; Tachibana O; Iizuka H; Nakada S; Yamada S
Neuroradiol J; 2019 Apr; 32(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 30648472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of histological differentiation in gastric cancers using whole-volume histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps.
Zhang Y; Chen J; Liu S; Shi H; Guan W; Ji C; Guo T; Zheng H; Guan Y; Ge Y; He J; Zhou Z; Yang X; Liu T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Feb; 45(2):440-449. PubMed ID: 27367863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diffusion kurtosis imaging of a human nasopharyngeal carcinoma xenograft model: Initial experience with pathological correlation.
Zhong J; Shi P; Chen Y; Huang R; Xiao Y; Zheng X; Zheng D; Peng L
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47():111-117. PubMed ID: 29221965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Correlation between DCE-MRI quantitative perfusion histogram parameters, apparent diffusion coefficient and Ki-67 in different pathological types of lung cancer].
Huang YN; Zhao ZH; Mao HJ; Yang JF; Wang T; Zhao L; Yang LM; Yu GM; Wang C
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 99(21):1645-1650. PubMed ID: 31189264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
