280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29141559)
1. New Histopathological & Genetic Features to Improve Active Surveillance Selection for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.
Chu K; Corcoran N; Norden S; Wong LM
Anticancer Agents Med Chem; 2018; 18(7):951-957. PubMed ID: 29141559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score as a Predictor of Adverse Pathology in Men on Active Surveillance.
Kornberg Z; Cooperberg MR; Cowan JE; Chan JM; Shinohara K; Simko JP; Tenggara I; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2019 Oct; 202(4):702-709. PubMed ID: 31026214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stability of a 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score in Serial Testing of Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer.
Cedars BE; Washington SL; Cowan JE; Leapman M; Tenggara I; Chan JM; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2019 Oct; 202(4):696-701. PubMed ID: 30958742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving risk stratification among veterans diagnosed with prostate cancer: impact of the 17-gene prostate score assay.
Lynch JA; Rothney MP; Salup RR; Ercole CE; Mathur SC; Duchene DA; Basler JW; Hernandez J; Liss MA; Porter MP; Wright JL; Risk MC; Garzotto M; Efimova O; Barrett L; Berse B; Kemeter MJ; Febbo PG; Dash A
Am J Manag Care; 2018 Jan; 24(1 Suppl):S4-S10. PubMed ID: 29337486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Biopsy-based 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score as a Predictor of Metastases and Prostate Cancer Death in Surgically Treated Men with Clinically Localized Disease.
Van Den Eeden SK; Lu R; Zhang N; Quesenberry CP; Shan J; Han JS; Tsiatis AC; Leimpeter AD; Lawrence HJ; Febbo PG; Presti JC
Eur Urol; 2018 Jan; 73(1):129-138. PubMed ID: 28988753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation of a Commercial Genomic Risk Classifier with Histological Patterns in Prostate Cancer.
Greenland NY; Zhang L; Cowan JE; Carroll PR; Stohr BA; Simko JP
J Urol; 2019 Jul; 202(1):90-95. PubMed ID: 30810466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Expressed prostatic secretion biomarkers improve stratification of NCCN active surveillance candidates: performance of secretion capacity and TMPRSS2:ERG models.
Whelan C; Kawachi M; Smith DD; Linehan J; Babilonia G; Mejia R; Wilson T; Smith SS
J Urol; 2014 Jan; 191(1):220-6. PubMed ID: 23669563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of clinicopathologic variables and biomarkers for risk stratification.
Loeb S; Bruinsma SM; Nicholson J; Briganti A; Pickles T; Kakehi Y; Carlsson SV; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):619-26. PubMed ID: 25457014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genomic Markers in Prostate Cancer Decision Making.
Cucchiara V; Cooperberg MR; Dall'Era M; Lin DW; Montorsi F; Schalken JA; Evans CP
Eur Urol; 2018 Apr; 73(4):572-582. PubMed ID: 29129398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tissue-based multigene expression tests for pretreatment prostate cancer risk assessment: current status and future perspectives.
Hiser WM; Sangiorgio V; Bollito E; Esnakula A; Feely M; Falzarano SM
Future Oncol; 2018 Dec; 14(29):3073-3083. PubMed ID: 30107751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genomic Prostate Score, PI-RADS™ version 2 and Progression in Men with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance.
Kornberg Z; Cowan JE; Westphalen AC; Cooperberg MR; Chan JM; Zhao S; Shinohara K; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2019 Feb; 201(2):300-307. PubMed ID: 30179620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk stratification of prostate cancer 2016.
Reiter RE
Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 2016; 245():S54-9. PubMed ID: 27533326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging in active surveillance of prostate cancer: a systematic review.
Schoots IG; Petrides N; Giganti F; Bokhorst LP; Rannikko A; Klotz L; Villers A; Hugosson J; Moore CM
Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):627-36. PubMed ID: 25511988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of New Tests and Interventions for Prostate Cancer Management: A Systematic Review.
Olleik G; Kassouf W; Aprikian A; Hu J; Vanhuyse M; Cury F; Peacock S; Bonnevier E; Palenius E; Dragomir A
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2018 Nov; 16(11):1340-1351. PubMed ID: 30442734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Transcript analysis of commercial prostate cancer risk stratification panels in hard-to-predict grade group 2-4 prostate cancers.
Lehto TK; Stürenberg C; Malén A; Erickson AM; Koistinen H; Mills IG; Rannikko A; Mirtti T
Prostate; 2021 May; 81(7):368-376. PubMed ID: 33734461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of Serum microRNA Biomarkers to Predict Reclassification of Prostate Cancer in Patients on Active Surveillance.
Liu RSC; Olkhov-Mitsel E; Jeyapala R; Zhao F; Commisso K; Klotz L; Loblaw A; Liu SK; Vesprini D; Fleshner NE; Bapat B
J Urol; 2018 Jun; 199(6):1475-1481. PubMed ID: 29246734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Defining Prostate Cancer at Favorable Intermediate Risk: The Potential Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Genomic Tests.
Falagario UG; Beksac AT; Martini A; Cumarasamy S; Gupta A; Prasad S; Thulasidass H; Shah QN; Jayaratna I; Lewis S; Rastinehad AR; Taouli B; Cormio L; Carrieri G; Tewari AK
J Urol; 2019 Jul; 202(1):102-107. PubMed ID: 30730408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preventing clinical progression and need for treatment in patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer.
Goldberg H; Klaassen Z; Chandrasekar T; Fleshner N
Curr Opin Urol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 29028765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tumor Volume on Biopsy of Low Risk Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance.
Tosoian JJ; Mamawala M; Patel HD; Alam R; Epstein JI; Ross AE; Carter HB
J Urol; 2018 Apr; 199(4):954-960. PubMed ID: 29074222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Potential Utility of Novel Biomarkers in Active Surveillance of Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.
Kim JH; Hong SK
Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():475920. PubMed ID: 26339615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
