These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29142880)

  • 41. Evaluating In Vitro Performance of a Novel Stainless Steel Rotary System (Gentlefile) Based on Debris Extrusion and Instrumentation Time.
    Nouroloyouni A; Safavi Hir F; Farhang R; Noorolouny S; Salem Milani A; Alyali R
    Biomed Res Int; 2023; 2023():9945236. PubMed ID: 37936828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Glide path preparation in S-shaped canals with rotary pathfinding nickel-titanium instruments.
    Ajuz NC; Armada L; Gonçalves LS; Debelian G; Siqueira JF
    J Endod; 2013 Apr; 39(4):534-7. PubMed ID: 23522552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals.
    Alves Vde O; Bueno CE; Cunha RS; Pinheiro SL; Fontana CE; de Martin AS
    J Endod; 2012 Jan; 38(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 22152634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Quantitative Assessment of apically Extruded Bacteria using different Instrumentation Techniques and Preparation Taper.
    Priyank H; Pandey V; Sethi A; Sharma VJ; Bali H; Punia RS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Sep; 18(9):826-830. PubMed ID: 28874649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The influence of a manual glide path on the separation rate of NiTi rotary instruments.
    Patiño PV; Biedma BM; Liébana CR; Cantatore G; Bahillo JG
    J Endod; 2005 Feb; 31(2):114-6. PubMed ID: 15671822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of ProGlider and One G Glide Path Files.
    Uslu G; Özyürek T; İnan U
    J Endod; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1555-8. PubMed ID: 27567035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal retreatment with several NiTi systems.
    Dincer AN; Er O; Canakci BC
    Int Endod J; 2015 Dec; 48(12):1194-8. PubMed ID: 25557631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during the removal of canal filling material using three different Ni-Ti systems and hand files in teeth with simulated apical root resorption.
    Topçuoğlu HS; Demirbuga S; Topçuoğlu G
    Int Endod J; 2020 Mar; 53(3):403-409. PubMed ID: 31605377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation in primary molar teeth using three different rotary systems and hand files.
    Topçuoğlu G; Topçuoğlu HS; Akpek F
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 26(5):357-63. PubMed ID: 26538300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of apically extruded bacteria associated with different nickel-titanium systems.
    Türker SA; Uzunoğlu E; Aslan MH
    J Endod; 2015 Jun; 41(6):953-5. PubMed ID: 25799537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evaluation of Canal Transportation after Using Different Types Rotary Glide Path Files.
    Shalan LA; Al-Huwaizi HF
    Iran Endod J; 2018; 13(4):565-568. PubMed ID: 36883032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using hand and three rotary instrumentation systems − An in vitro study.
    Madhusudhana K; Mathew VB; Reddy NM
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2010 Oct; 1(4):234-6. PubMed ID: 22114427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. In Vitro Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris during Root Canal Preparation of Mandibular Premolars with Manual and Rotary Instruments.
    Soi S; Yadav S; Sharma S; Sharma M
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2015; 9(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 26697144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Assessment of apically extruded debris and irrigant produced by different nickel-titanium instrument systems.
    Küçükyilmaz E; Savas S; Saygili G; Uysal B
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():1-6. PubMed ID: 25387860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris with different single-file systems: Reciproc, F360 and OneShape versus Mtwo.
    Bürklein S; Benten S; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2014 May; 47(5):405-9. PubMed ID: 23889673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems.
    Bürklein S; Schäfer E
    J Endod; 2012 Jun; 38(6):850-2. PubMed ID: 22595125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Mechanical reduction of the intracanal Enterococcus faecalis population by Hyflex CM, K3XF, ProTaper Next, and two manual instrument systems: an in vitro comparative study.
    Tewari RK; Ali S; Mishra SK; Kumar A; Andrabi SM; Zoya A; Alam S
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2016 May; 7(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 25424649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of manual K-files and reciprocating files in glide path preparation: a micro-computed tomography study of constricted canals.
    Liu JY; Zhou ZX; Tseng WJ; Karabucak B
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Feb; 21(1):83. PubMed ID: 33622296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Surface Changes of PathFile after Glide Path Preparation: An Ex Vivo and In Vivo Study.
    Kim Y; Love R; George R
    J Endod; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1674-1678. PubMed ID: 28689701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparative evaluation of apical extrusion of bacteria using hand and rotary systems : An in vitro study.
    Ghivari SB; Kubasad GC; Deshpande P
    J Conserv Dent; 2012 Jan; 15(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 22368332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.