These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 291433)

  • 1. Genetic manipulation advisory group (GMAG) and the environment for genetic engineering in Britain.
    Williamson R
    Biochem Soc Symp; 1979; 44():119-21. PubMed ID: 291433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. GMAG and the teenage jackass.
    Denselow J
    New Sci; 1982 Aug; 95(1320):558-61. PubMed ID: 11655478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. GMAG wants to stay on.
    Walgate R
    Nature; 1978 May; 273(5660):259. PubMed ID: 11643458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic engineering. Dispute over monitoring.
    Webb B
    Nature; 1989 Sep; 341(6237):7. PubMed ID: 2770882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Common sense in genetic engineering.
    Harris R
    Ethics Sci Med; 1978; 5(2-4):57-64. PubMed ID: 11662705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. UK genetic engineering regulations relax gradually.
    Redfearn J
    Nature; 1979 Dec 20-27; 282(5741):769. PubMed ID: 514360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Britain's genetic manipulation regulations to be extended.
    Newmark P
    Nature; 1987 Oct 1-7; 329(6138):379. PubMed ID: 3477700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic manipulation: British watchdog reconstituted.
    Beardsley T
    Nature; 1984 Feb; 307(5950):406. PubMed ID: 11653513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Still looser UK guidelines.
    Nature; 1980 Sep; 287(5780):265-6. PubMed ID: 6932590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Social implications of experiments in genetic manipulation.
    Wolstenholme G
    J R Soc Arts; 1979 Sep; 127(5278):643-53. PubMed ID: 11662763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biotechnology report urges 10 million pound programme "to match competitors".
    Walgate R
    Nature; 1980 Jan; 283(5745):324-5. PubMed ID: 6928053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What future for regulation? UK committee's role disputed.
    Wynn J
    Nature; 1982 Sep; 299(5882):387. PubMed ID: 11643800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Senate hearing on the potential environmental consequences of genetic engineering.
    Milweski E
    Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1984 Dec; 7(4):189-203. PubMed ID: 6598875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regulation of Agrobacterium gene manipulation.
    Dewhurst F
    Methods Mol Biol; 1995; 44():369-91. PubMed ID: 7581679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bacteriologists lobby GMAG's first public meeting.
    Lawrence E
    Nature; 1979 Jan; 277(5691):3. PubMed ID: 552596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Britain regulates organism release.
    Webb B
    Nature; 1989 Oct; 341(6244):681. PubMed ID: 2797198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic manipulation: test-tube organisms.
    Greenaway P
    Nurs Mirror; 1980 Dec; 151(24):36-8. PubMed ID: 6449694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Plasmid vectors for genetic manipulation in vitro.
    Sherratt DJ
    Biochem Soc Symp; 1979; 44():29-36. PubMed ID: 387037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meeting of the large-scale review working group of the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee.
    Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1982 Mar; 5(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 7071379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fate of genetically-engineered microbes in natural environments.
    Stotzky G; Babich H
    Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1984 Dec; 7(4):163-88. PubMed ID: 6100330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.