BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2914436)

  • 1. A left versus right side comparative study of Epiquick patch test results in 100 consecutive patients.
    Lachapelle JM
    Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Jan; 20(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 2914436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. European multicenter study of the TRUE Test.
    Lachapelle JM; Bruynzeel DP; Ducombs G; Hannuksela M; Ring J; White IR; Wilkinson J; Fischer T; Billberg K
    Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Aug; 19(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 3180789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. European multicenter study of TRUE Test, Panel 2.
    Wilkinson JD; Bruynzeel DP; Ducombs G; Frosch PJ; Gunnarsson Y; Hannuksela M; Lachapelle JM; Ring J; Shaw S; White IR
    Contact Dermatitis; 1990 Apr; 22(4):218-25. PubMed ID: 2189668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproducibility of patch test results: a concurrent right-versus-left study using TRUE Test.
    Ale SI; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 May; 50(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 15209812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patch test reactions to human dander in atopic dermatitis.
    Uehara M; Ofuji S
    Arch Dermatol; 1976 Jul; 112(7):951-4. PubMed ID: 938073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Problems raised by the simultaneous reproducibility of positive allergic patch test reactions in man.
    Lachapelle JM; Antoine JL
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1989 Oct; 21(4 Pt 2):850-4. PubMed ID: 2689479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Epicutaneous testing with a standard series. Results in 12,026 patients].
    Enders F; Przybilla B; Ring J; Burg G; Braun-Falco O
    Hautarzt; 1988 Dec; 39(12):779-86. PubMed ID: 2976753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Papulo-vesicular count for the rating of allergic patch test reactions. A simple technique based on polysulfide rubber replica.
    Peters K; Serup J
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1987; 67(6):491-5. PubMed ID: 2451373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A left versus right side comparative study of Finn Chamber patch tests in 220 consecutive patients.
    Lindelöf B
    Contact Dermatitis; 1990 May; 22(5):288-9. PubMed ID: 2383987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
    Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
    Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproducibility of patch test results: comparison of TRUE Test and Finn Chamber test results.
    Gollhausen R; Przybilla B; Ring J
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1989 Oct; 21(4 Pt 2):843-6. PubMed ID: 2600211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple concomitant positive patch test reactions.
    Mitchell JC
    Contact Dermatitis; 1977 Dec; 3(6):315-20. PubMed ID: 606486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproducibility of patch tests.
    Gollhausen R; Przybilla B; Ring J
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1989 Dec; 21(6):1196-202. PubMed ID: 2584455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The reproducibility of patch tests.
    Bourke JF; Batta K; Prais L; Abdullah A; Foulds IS
    Br J Dermatol; 1999 Jan; 140(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 10215776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Reproducibility of epicutaneous test results].
    Szliska C; Rakoski J
    Z Hautkr; 1988; 63 Suppl 4():67-9. PubMed ID: 2978100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contact dermatitis with negative patch tests: the additive effect of allergens in combination.
    McLelland J; Shuster S
    Br J Dermatol; 1990 May; 122(5):623-30. PubMed ID: 2354115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproducibility of patch tests: comparison of identical test allergens from different commercial sources.
    Schiessl C; Wolber C; Strohal R
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jan; 50(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 15059100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Late reactions to the patch-test preparations para-phenylenediamine and epoxy resin: a prospective multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
    Hillen U; Jappe U; Frosch PJ; Becker D; Brasch J; Lilie M; Fuchs T; Kreft B; Pirker C; Geier J;
    Br J Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 154(4):665-70. PubMed ID: 16536809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Atopy patch test--reproducibility and elicitation of itch in different application sites.
    Weissenbacher S; Bacon T; Targett D; Behrendt H; Ring J; Darsow U
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2005; 85(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 15823910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patch testing with nickel chloride in a hydrogel.
    Fullerton A; Menné T; Hoelgaard A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Jan; 20(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 2914431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.