660 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29144586)
1. Relationship Between Hospital-Level Percentage of Midwife-Attended Births and Obstetric Procedure Utilization.
Attanasio L; Kozhimannil KB
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2018 Jan; 63(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 29144586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes of planned home births versus planned hospital births after regulation of midwifery in British Columbia.
Janssen PA; Lee SK; Ryan EM; Etches DJ; Farquharson DF; Peacock D; Klein MC
CMAJ; 2002 Feb; 166(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 11868639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Midwifery and Obstetric Care in Low-Risk Hospital Births.
Souter V; Nethery E; Kopas ML; Wurz H; Sitcov K; Caughey AB
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 134(5):1056-1065. PubMed ID: 31599830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Labor and Birth Care Satisfaction Associated With Medical Interventions and Accompaniment During Labor Among Chilean Women.
Weeks F; Pantoja L; Ortiz J; Foster J; Cavada G; Binfa L
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2017 Mar; 62(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 27543442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perinatal risks of planned home births in the United States.
Grünebaum A; McCullough LB; Brent RL; Arabin B; Levene MI; Chervenak FA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 212(3):350.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25446661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Birth Outcomes of Women Using a Midwife versus Women Using a Physician for Prenatal Care.
Loewenberg Weisband Y; Klebanoff M; Gallo MF; Shoben A; Norris AH
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2018 Jul; 63(4):399-409. PubMed ID: 29944777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Labor and birth care by nurse with midwifery skills in Brazil.
Gama SG; Viellas EF; Torres JA; Bastos MH; Brüggemann OM; Theme Filha MM; Schilithz AO; Leal MD
Reprod Health; 2016 Oct; 13(Suppl 3):123. PubMed ID: 27766971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maternity Outcomes in Manitoba Women: A Comparison between Midwifery-led Care and Physician-led Care at Birth.
Thiessen K; Nickel N; Prior HJ; Banerjee A; Morris M; Robinson K
Birth; 2016 Jun; 43(2):108-15. PubMed ID: 26889889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of planned hospital birth attended by midwives compared with physicians in British Columbia.
Janssen PA; Ryan EM; Etches DJ; Klein MC; Reime B
Birth; 2007 Jun; 34(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 17542818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Midwife-led care and obstetrician-led care for low-risk pregnancies: A cost comparison.
Attanasio LB; Alarid-Escudero F; Kozhimannil KB
Birth; 2020 Mar; 47(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 31680337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician.
Janssen PA; Saxell L; Page LA; Klein MC; Liston RM; Lee SK
CMAJ; 2009 Sep; 181(6-7):377-83. PubMed ID: 19720688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using the Robson 10-Group Classification System to Compare Cesarean Birth Utilization Between US Centers With and Without Midwives.
Smith DC; Phillippi JC; Lowe NK; Breman RB; Carlson NS; Neal JL; Gutierrez E; Tilden EL
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2020 Jan; 65(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 31553129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intrapartum Care and Experiences of Women with Midwives Versus Obstetricians in the Listening to Mothers in California Survey.
Declercq ER; Belanoff C; Sakala C
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2020 Jan; 65(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 31448884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perineal injury in nulliparous women giving birth at a community hospital: reduced risk in births attended by certified nurse-midwives.
Browne M; Jacobs M; Lahiff M; Miller S
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2010; 55(3):243-9. PubMed ID: 20434084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Association between provider type and cesarean birth in healthy nulliparous laboring women: A retrospective cohort study.
Carlson NS; Corwin EJ; Hernandez TL; Holt E; Lowe NK; Hurt KJ
Birth; 2018 Jun; 45(2):159-168. PubMed ID: 29388247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neonatal mortality in the United States is related to location of birth (hospital versus home) rather than the type of birth attendant.
Grünebaum A; McCullough LB; Orosz B; Chervenak FA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):254.e1-254.e8. PubMed ID: 32044310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Midwifery care in rural and remote British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study of perinatal outcomes of rural parturient women with a midwife involved in their care, 2003 to 2008.
Stoll K; Kornelsen J
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 24588878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hospital variation in utilization and success of trial of labor after a prior cesarean.
Xu X; Lee HC; Lin H; Lundsberg LS; Campbell KH; Lipkind HS; Pettker CM; Illuzzi JL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 220(1):98.e1-98.e14. PubMed ID: 30278176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maternal and neonatal outcome of births planned in alongside midwifery units: a cohort study from a tertiary center in Germany.
Merz WM; Tascon-Padron L; Puth MT; Heep A; Tietjen SL; Schmid M; Gembruch U
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 May; 20(1):267. PubMed ID: 32375692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of partnership caseload midwifery care with conventional team midwifery care: labour and birth outcomes.
Benjamin Y; Walsh D; Taub N
Midwifery; 2001 Sep; 17(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 11502143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]