These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29145526)

  • 1. Factors Affecting the Decision to Use Cemented or Screw-Retained Fixed Implant-Supported Prostheses: A Critical Review.
    Gómez-Polo M; Ortega R; Gómez-Polo C; Celemin A; Del Rio Highsmith J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(1):43–54. PubMed ID: 29145526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of prosthesis type and retention mechanism on complications with fixed implant-supported prostheses: a systematic review applying multivariate analyses.
    Millen C; Brägger U; Wittneben JG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(1):110-24. PubMed ID: 25615920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison between screw- and cement-retained implant prostheses. A literature review.
    Shadid R; Sadaqa N
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Jun; 38(3):298-307. PubMed ID: 21091343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screw retained vs. cement retained implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis.
    Wittneben JG; Joda T; Weber HP; Brägger U
    Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):141-151. PubMed ID: 28000276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screw Access Mark for Cemented Implant Crowns: A Universal Technique to Simplify Retrievability.
    Schoenbaum TR; Chang YY; Stevenson RG
    J Oral Implantol; 2018 Feb; 44(1):71-73. PubMed ID: 29090975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Techniques for locating the screw access hole in cement-retained implant-supported prostheses: A systematic review.
    Martín Ortega N; Baños MÁ; Martínez J; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 34809995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
    Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of screw access on the retention of cement-retained implant prostheses.
    da Rocha PV; Freitas MA; de Morais Alves da Cunha T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 23566608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Newly Designed Screw- and Cement-Retained Prosthesis and Its Abutments.
    Heo YK; Lim YJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(6):612-4. PubMed ID: 26523721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new prosthodontic technique for fabricating cement-retained implant-supported prostheses.
    Wat PY; Pow EH; Chow TW
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Mar; 31(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 11203924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A rationale for retrievability of fixed, implant-supported prostheses: a complication-based analysis.
    Gervais MJ; Wilson PR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 17319357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term outcome of cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported partial restorations.
    Nissan J; Narobai D; Gross O; Ghelfan O; Chaushu G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1102-7. PubMed ID: 22010095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screw- versus cement-retained implant restorations: current concepts.
    Lee A; Okayasu K; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2010 Feb; 19(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 20147811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro effect of load cycling on metal-ceramic cement- and screw-retained implant restorations.
    Karl M; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Mar; 97(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 17394911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dental rehabilitation of an elderly patient using an alternative implant-supported mandibular cemented prosthesis: a case report.
    Turkyilmaz I
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(3):276-9. PubMed ID: 19819819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Simple Technique for Fabricating a Screw-Retained/Cemented Implant-Supported Crown.
    Helvey GA
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2017 Mar; 38(3):153-159; quiz 160. PubMed ID: 28257222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screw-access marking: a technique to simplify retrieval of cement-retained implant prostheses.
    Schoenbaum TR; Chang YY; Klokkevold PR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Mar; 34(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 23931268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Emms M; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 17244301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a 4-year prospective clinical study.
    Vigolo P; Givani A; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 15101598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An esthetic solution to the screw-retained implant restoration: introduction to the implant crown adhesive plug: clinical report.
    Wadhwani C; Piñeyro A; Avots J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 23(3):138-43. PubMed ID: 21649826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.