191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29147335)
1. Diagnostic Accuracy of Imaging Modalities in the Evaluation of Vascular Invasion in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.
Li AE; Li BT; Ng BHK; McCormack S; Vedelago J; Clarke S; Pavlakis N; Samra J
World J Oncol; 2013 Apr; 4(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 29147335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities following computed tomography (CT) scanning for assessing the resectability with curative intent in pancreatic and periampullary cancer.
Tamburrino D; Riviere D; Yaghoobi M; Davidson BR; Gurusamy KS
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Sep; 9(9):CD011515. PubMed ID: 27631326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.
Best LM; Rawji V; Pereira SP; Davidson BR; Gurusamy KS
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 4(4):CD010213. PubMed ID: 28415140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance characteristics of endoscopic ultrasound in the staging of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.
Nawaz H; Fan CY; Kloke J; Khalid A; McGrath K; Landsittel D; Papachristou GI
JOP; 2013 Sep; 14(5):484-97. PubMed ID: 24018593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endoscopic ultrasound versus computed tomography in determining the resectability of pancreatic cancer: A diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.
Rahman MIO; Chan BPH; Far PM; Mbuagbaw L; Thabane L; Yaghoobi M
Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2020; 26(3):113-119. PubMed ID: 32436866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MRI vs. CT for pancreatic adenocarcinoma vascular invasion: comparative diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jajodia A; Wang A; Alabousi M; Wilks C; Kulkarni A; van der Pol CB
Eur Radiol; 2023 Oct; 33(10):6883-6891. PubMed ID: 37083741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of EUS and CT of vascular invasion in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review.
Yang R; Lu M; Qian X; Chen J; Li L; Wang J; Zhang Y
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2014 Dec; 140(12):2077-86. PubMed ID: 24916170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. EUS versus magnetic resonance imaging in staging rectal adenocarcinoma: a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.
Chan BPH; Patel R; Mbuagbaw L; Thabane L; Yaghoobi M
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Aug; 90(2):196-203.e1. PubMed ID: 31004599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating local lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging, endoluminal ultrasound and computed tomography in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Li XT; Sun YS; Tang L; Cao K; Zhang XY
Colorectal Dis; 2015 Jun; 17(6):O129-35. PubMed ID: 25628186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrasound, CT, MRI, or PET-CT for staging and re-staging of adults with cutaneous melanoma.
Dinnes J; Ferrante di Ruffano L; Takwoingi Y; Cheung ST; Nathan P; Matin RN; Chuchu N; Chan SA; Durack A; Bayliss SE; Gulati A; Patel L; Davenport C; Godfrey K; Subesinghe M; Traill Z; Deeks JJ; Williams HC;
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Jul; 7(7):CD012806. PubMed ID: 31260100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Pancreatic Cystic Lesions Compared to CT and Endoscopic Ultrasound: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Udare A; Agarwal M; Alabousi M; McInnes M; Rubino JG; Marcaccio M; van der Pol CB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Oct; 54(4):1126-1137. PubMed ID: 33847435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The presence of a cytopathologist increases the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis.
Hébert-Magee S; Bae S; Varadarajulu S; Ramesh J; Frost AR; Eloubeidi MA; Eltoum IA
Cytopathology; 2013 Jun; 24(3):159-71. PubMed ID: 23711182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperative vascular evaluation with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.
Zhang Y; Huang J; Chen M; Jiao LR
Pancreatology; 2012; 12(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 22687378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The diagnostic role of CT, MRI/MRCP, PET/CT, EUS and DWI in the differentiation of benign and malignant IPMN: A meta-analysis.
Liu H; Cui Y; Shao J; Shao Z; Su F; Li Y
Clin Imaging; 2021 Apr; 72():183-193. PubMed ID: 33321460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for the preoperative locoregional staging of primary gastric cancer.
Mocellin S; Pasquali S
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Feb; 2015(2):CD009944. PubMed ID: 25914908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. EUS, PET, and CT scanning for evaluation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Mertz HR; Sechopoulos P; Delbeke D; Leach SD
Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Sep; 52(3):367-71. PubMed ID: 10968852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pancreatic cancer--EUS and early diagnosis.
Helmstaedter L; Riemann JF
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2008 Nov; 393(6):923-7. PubMed ID: 18247044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vascular invasion in pancreatic cancer: predictive values for endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography imaging.
Tellez-Avila FI; Chavez-Tapia NC; López-Arce G; Franco-Guzmán AM; Sosa-Lozano LA; Alfaro-Lara R; Chan-Nuñez C; Giovannini M; Elizondo-Rivera J; Ramírez-Luna MA
Pancreas; 2012 May; 41(4):636-8. PubMed ID: 22460727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnosis of vascular invasion in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using endoscopic ultrasound elastography.
Yamada K; Kawashima H; Ohno E; Ishikawa T; Tanaka H; Nakamura M; Miyahara R; Ishigami M; Hirooka Y; Fujishiro M
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):81. PubMed ID: 32228472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
