60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2914770)
1. Well you can come in but i'm not having it. The role of the health visitor in computer-managed cervical screening.
Elkind AK; Haran D; Eardley A; Spencer B
Health Visit; 1989 Jan; 62(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 2914770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Encouraging underscreened women to have cervical cancer screening: the effectiveness of a computer strategy.
Campbell E; Peterkin D; Abbott R; Rogers J
Prev Med; 1997; 26(6):801-7. PubMed ID: 9388791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Attendance to cervical cancer screening in family practices in The Netherlands.
Hermens RP; Tacken MA; Hulscher ME; Braspenning JC; Grol RP
Prev Med; 2000 Jan; 30(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10642458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preliminary results of a general practice based call system for cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands.
Palm BT; Kant AC; van den Bosch WJ; Vooijs GP; van Weel C
Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Dec; 43(377):503-6. PubMed ID: 8312021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical screening: default and compliance.
Martin J; Main PJ
Health Visit; 1992 Apr; 65(4):123-4. PubMed ID: 1624303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Promotion of cervical screening uptake by health visitor follow-up of women who repeatedly failed to attend.
Campbell H; MacDonald S; McKiernan M
J Public Health Med; 1996 Mar; 18(1):94-7. PubMed ID: 8785082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Women's perceptions and social barriers determine compliance to cervical screening: results from a population based study in India.
Basu P; Sarkar S; Mukherjee S; Ghoshal M; Mittal S; Biswas S; Mandal R; Sankaranarayanan R
Cancer Detect Prev; 2006; 30(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 16963194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a pilot study for breast and cervical cancer screening with Bradford's minority ethnic women; a community development approach, 1991-93.
Kernohan EE
Br J Cancer Suppl; 1996 Sep; 29():S42-6. PubMed ID: 8782798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reasons for non-attendance for computer-managed cervical screening: pilot interviews.
Elkind AK; Haran D; Eardley A; Spencer B
Soc Sci Med; 1988; 27(6):651-60. PubMed ID: 3227371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of a call/recall system in improving compliance with cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.
Buehler SK; Parsons WL
CMAJ; 1997 Sep; 157(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 9294390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adherence to cervical and breast cancer programs is crucial to improving screening performance.
Mauad EC; Nicolau SM; Moreira LF; Haikel RL; Longatto-Filho A; Baracat EC
Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(3):1241. PubMed ID: 19778158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Why women still die from cervical cancer.
Masood S
J Fla Med Assoc; 1997; 84(6):379-83. PubMed ID: 9379163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reasons for non-attendance at cervical screening as reported by non-attendees in Sweden.
Oscarsson MG; Benzein EG; Wijma BE
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Mar; 29(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 18266164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A large population-based randomized controlled trial to increase attendance at screening for cervical cancer.
Eaker S; Adami HO; Granath F; Wilander E; Sparén P
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Mar; 13(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 15006907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Characterization of "non-attenders" in an organized screening against cancer of cervix uteri].
Larsen LP; Olesen F
Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 May; 158(21):2987-91. PubMed ID: 8686037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. "Health is strength": a community health education program to improve breast and cervical cancer screening among Korean American Women in Alameda County, California.
Moskowitz JM; Kazinets G; Wong JM; Tager IB
Cancer Detect Prev; 2007; 31(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 17418978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Women's attitudes to and awareness of smear testing and cervical cancer.
Yu CK; Rymer J
Br J Fam Plann; 1998 Jan; 23(4):127-33. PubMed ID: 9882766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-managed call and recall for cervical screening: a typology of reasons for non-attendance.
Elkind A; Eardley A; Haran D; Spencer B; Smith A
Community Med; 1989 May; 11(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 2752723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Synthesising research findings and practical experience to formulate principles in cervical screening.
Hobbs P; Eardley A; Elkind AK; Haran D; Pendleton LL; Spencer B
Cancer Detect Prev; 1987; 10(3-4):255-64. PubMed ID: 3568024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical cytology screening. How can we improve rates among First Nations women in urban British Columbia?
Hislop TG; Clarke HF; Deschamps M; Joseph R; Band PR; Smith J; Le N; Atleo R
Can Fam Physician; 1996 Sep; 42():1701-8. PubMed ID: 8828873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
