113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29148056)
1. The List Experiment for Measuring Abortion: What We Know and What We Need.
Moseson H; Treleaven E; Gerdts C; Diamond-Smith N
Stud Fam Plann; 2017 Dec; 48(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 29148056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reducing under-reporting of stigmatized health events using the List Experiment: results from a randomized, population-based study of abortion in Liberia.
Moseson H; Massaquoi M; Dehlendorf C; Bawo L; Dahn B; Zolia Y; Vittinghoff E; Hiatt RA; Gerdts C
Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 44(6):1951-8. PubMed ID: 26342584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multivariable regression analysis of list experiment data on abortion: results from a large, randomly-selected population based study in Liberia.
Moseson H; Gerdts C; Dehlendorf C; Hiatt RA; Vittinghoff E
Popul Health Metr; 2017 Dec; 15(1):40. PubMed ID: 29268794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can a List Experiment Improve Validity of Abortion Measurement?
Bell SO; Bishai D
Stud Fam Plann; 2019 Mar; 50(1):43-61. PubMed ID: 30675727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The list experiment: An approach to measuring stigmatized behaviours related to sex-selective abortion.
Treleaven E; Pham TN; Nguyen AD; Diamond-Smith N
Popul Stud (Camb); 2021 Nov; 75(3):363-380. PubMed ID: 33792524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating abortion prevalence and understanding perspectives of community leaders and providers: Results from a mixed-method study in Istanbul, Turkey.
Huber-Krum S; Karadon D; Kurutas S; Rohr J; Baykal SS; Okcuoglu BA; Esmer Y; Canning D; Shah I
Womens Health (Lond); 2020; 16():1745506520953353. PubMed ID: 32853055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Novel approaches to estimating abortion incidence.
Sedgh G; Keogh SC
Reprod Health; 2019 Apr; 16(1):44. PubMed ID: 30999917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reducing underreporting of stigmatized pregnancy outcomes: results from a mixed-methods study of self-managed abortion in Texas using the list-experiment method.
Moseson H; Filippa S; Baum SE; Gerdts C; Grossman D
BMC Womens Health; 2019 Sep; 19(1):113. PubMed ID: 31481033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An Application of the List Experiment to Estimate Abortion Prevalence in Karachi, Pakistan.
Huber-Krum S; Hackett K; Kaur N; Nausheen S; Soofi S; Canning D; Shah I
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2020 Dec; 46(Suppl 1):13-24. PubMed ID: 33326396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of abortion incidence estimates derived from direct survey questions versus the list experiment among women in Ohio.
Hood RB; Moseson H; Smith M; Chakraborty P; Norris AH; Gallo MF
PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0269476. PubMed ID: 35657985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measuring the extent of abortion underreporting in the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.
Fu H; Darroch JE; Henshaw SK; Kolb E
Fam Plann Perspect; 1998; 30(3):128-33, 138. PubMed ID: 9635261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Attitudes about abortion of women who undergo prenatal diagnosis.
Kolker A; Burke BM; Phillips JU
Res Sociol Health Care; 1991; 9():49-73. PubMed ID: 12317576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reducing underreporting of abortion in surveys: Results from two test applications of the list experiment method in Malawi and Senegal.
Moseson H; Jayaweera R; Huber-Krum S; Garver S; Norris A; Gerdts C
PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0247201. PubMed ID: 33657126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The potential impact of improvements in contraception on fertility and abortion in Western countries.
Westoff CF; Hammerslough CR; Paul L
Eur J Popul; 1987 Nov; 3(1):7-32. PubMed ID: 12280731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion Reporting in the United States: An Assessment of Three National Fertility Surveys.
Lindberg L; Kost K; Maddow-Zimet I; Desai S; Zolna M
Demography; 2020 Jun; 57(3):899-925. PubMed ID: 32458318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk factors for repeat abortion and implications for addressing unintended pregnancy in Vietnam.
Ngo TD; Keogh S; Nguyen TH; Le HT; Pham KH; Nguyen YB
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 125(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 24726618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Survey questions for the measurement of induced abortion.
Huntington D; Mensch B; Miller VC
Stud Fam Plann; 1996; 27(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 8829298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Time for Better Access to High-Quality Abortion Data in the United States.
Ahrens KA; Hutcheon JA
Am J Epidemiol; 2020 Jul; 189(7):640-647. PubMed ID: 32219373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unmet/met need for contraception and self-reported abortion in Ghana.
Amo-Adjei J; Darteh EKM
Sex Reprod Healthc; 2017 Oct; 13():118-124. PubMed ID: 28844352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new approach to eliciting information about induced abortion.
Huntington D; Mensch B; Toubia N
Stud Fam Plann; 1993; 24(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 8390117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
