255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29148064)
1. A Validation Study of the Langley et al. (2017) Decision Tree Model for Sex Estimation.
Garvin HM; Klales AR
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):1243-1251. PubMed ID: 29148064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Decision Tree for Nonmetric Sex Assessment from the Skull.
Langley NR; Dudzik B; Cloutier A
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jan; 63(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 28508544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Statistical classification methods for estimating sex based on five skull traits: A nonmetric assessment using 3D CT models.
Shim YT; Kim DI; Aum N; Choi SG; Lee YS; Koo HN; Kim YS
Homo; 2023 Apr; 74(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 36920118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantifying Sexual Dimorphism in the Human Cranium: A Preliminary Analysis of a Novel Method.
Casado AM
J Forensic Sci; 2017 Sep; 62(5):1259-1265. PubMed ID: 28547887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sexual dimorphism in human cranial trait scores: effects of population, age, and body size.
Garvin HM; Sholts SB; Mosca LA
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2014 Jun; 154(2):259-69. PubMed ID: 24595622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Metric Sex Determination of the Human Coxal Bone on a Virtual Sample using Decision Trees.
Savall F; Faruch-Bilfeld M; Dedouit F; Sans N; Rousseau H; Rougé D; Telmon N
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1395-400. PubMed ID: 26259073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy and Reliability of the Klales et al. (2012) Morphoscopic Pelvic Sexing Method.
Lesciotto KM; Doershuk LJ
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jan; 63(1):214-220. PubMed ID: 28382657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative Sex Estimation Based on Cranial Traits Using R Functions.
Nikita E
J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jan; 64(1):175-180. PubMed ID: 29856889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of the Optimized Summed Scored Attributes Method to Sex Estimation in Asian Crania.
Tallman SD; Go MC
J Forensic Sci; 2018 May; 63(3):809-814. PubMed ID: 28940235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The utility of elliptical Fourier analysis for estimating ancestry and sex from lateral skull photographs.
Caple JM; Byrd JE; Stephan CN
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():352-362. PubMed ID: 29957511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Applying posterior probability informed thresholds to traditional cranial trait sex estimation methods.
Avent PR; Hughes CE; Garvin HM
J Forensic Sci; 2022 Mar; 67(2):440-449. PubMed ID: 34799862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving Nonmetric Sex Classification for Hispanic Individuals.
Klales AR; Cole SJ
J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jul; 62(4):975-980. PubMed ID: 28070893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving sex estimation from crania using a novel three-dimensional quantitative method.
Abdel Fatah EE; Shirley NR; Jantz RL; Mahfouz MR
J Forensic Sci; 2014 May; 59(3):590-600. PubMed ID: 24502609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative analysis of four morphometric methods for sex estimation: A study conducted on human skulls.
Sinhorini PA; Costa IAP; Lopez-Capp TT; Biazevic MGH; de Paiva LAS
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2019 Jul; 39():29-34. PubMed ID: 31200148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of discriminant functions for sexing skulls from visually assessed traits applied in the Rainer Osteological Collection (Bucharest, Romania).
Soficaru A; Constantinescu M; Culea M; Ionică C
Homo; 2014 Dec; 65(6):464-75. PubMed ID: 25457446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Worldwide population variation in pelvic sexual dimorphism: A validation and recalibration of the Klales et al. method.
Kenyhercz MW; Klales AR; Stull KE; McCormick KA; Cole SJ
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Aug; 277():259.e1-259.e8. PubMed ID: 28666560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validating the use of clinical MSCT scans for cranial nonmetric sex estimation in a contemporary Indonesian population.
Lye R; Obertová Z; Bachtiar NA; Franklin D
Int J Legal Med; 2024 Jul; 138(4):1559-1571. PubMed ID: 38300302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sexual dimorphism in cranial morphology among modern South Africans.
Krüger GC; L'Abbé EN; Stull KE; Kenyhercz MW
Int J Legal Med; 2015 Jul; 129(4):869-75. PubMed ID: 25394745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The skull and humerus in the determination of sex: reliability of discriminant function equations.
Robinson MS; Bidmos MA
Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Apr; 186(1-3):86.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19216037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Advanced procedures for skull sex estimation using sexually dimorphic morphometric features.
Bertsatos A; Chovalopoulou ME; Brůžek J; Bejdová Š
Int J Legal Med; 2020 Sep; 134(5):1927-1937. PubMed ID: 32504147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
