267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29148575)
1. Effects of spot parameters in pencil beam scanning treatment planning.
Kraan AC; Depauw N; Clasie B; Giunta M; Madden T; Kooy HM
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):60-73. PubMed ID: 29148575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implication of spot position error on plan quality and patient safety in pencil-beam-scanning proton therapy.
Yu J; Beltran CJ; Herman MG
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081706. PubMed ID: 25086516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Integrated beam orientation and scanning-spot optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy for brain and unilateral head and neck tumors.
Gu W; O'Connor D; Nguyen D; Yu VY; Ruan D; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1338-1350. PubMed ID: 29394454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Technical Note: Treatment planning system (TPS) approximations matter - comparing intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plan quality and robustness between a commercial and an in-house developed TPS for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Liu C; Yu NY; Shan J; Bhangoo RS; Daniels TB; Chiang JS; Ding X; Lara P; Patrick CL; Archuleta JP; DeWees T; Hu Y; Schild SE; Bues M; Sio TT; Liu W
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):4755-4762. PubMed ID: 31498885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of two methods for minimizing the effect of delayed charge on the dose delivered with a synchrotron based discrete spot scanning proton beam.
Whitaker TJ; Beltran C; Tryggestad E; Bues M; Kruse JJ; Remmes NB; Tasson A; Herman MG
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081703. PubMed ID: 25086513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of single-energy proton pencil beam scanning Bragg peak for intensity-modulated proton therapy FLASH treatment planning in liver-hypofractionated radiation therapy.
Wei S; Lin H; Shi C; Xiong W; Chen CC; Huang S; Press RH; Hasan S; Chhabra AM; Choi JI; Simone CB; Kang M
Med Phys; 2022 Oct; 49(10):6560-6574. PubMed ID: 35929404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of Spot Size and Spacing on the Quality of Robustly Optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans for Lung Cancer.
Liu C; Schild SE; Chang JY; Liao Z; Korte S; Shen J; Ding X; Hu Y; Kang Y; Keole SR; Sio TT; Wong WW; Sahoo N; Bues M; Liu W
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2018 Jun; 101(2):479-489. PubMed ID: 29550033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of Spot Size and Beam-Shaping Devices on the Treatment Plan Quality for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy.
Moteabbed M; Yock TI; Depauw N; Madden TM; Kooy HM; Paganetti H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):190-198. PubMed ID: 27084640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Technical Note: Plan-delivery-time constrained inverse optimization method with minimum-MU-per-energy-layer (MMPEL) for efficient pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Gao H; Clasie B; McDonald M; Langen KM; Liu T; Lin Y
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):3892-3897. PubMed ID: 32614472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is there a single spot size and grid for intensity modulated proton therapy? Simulation of head and neck, prostate and mesothelioma cases.
Widesott L; Lomax AJ; Schwarz M
Med Phys; 2012 Mar; 39(3):1298-308. PubMed ID: 22380362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of spot charge inaccuracies in IMPT treatments.
Kraan AC; Depauw N; Clasie B; Giunta M; Madden T; Kooy HM
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):3923-3931. PubMed ID: 28569997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proton beam radiotherapy versus fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for uveal melanomas: A comparative study.
Weber DC; Bogner J; Verwey J; Georg D; Dieckmann K; Escudé L; Caro M; Pötter R; Goitein G; Lomax AJ; Miralbell R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):373-84. PubMed ID: 16168832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of minimum monitor unit threshold on spot scanning proton plan quality.
Howard M; Beltran C; Mayo CS; Herman MG
Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091703. PubMed ID: 25186378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of varying planning parameters on proton pencil beam scanning dose distributions in four commercial treatment planning systems.
Alshaikhi J; Doolan PJ; D'Souza D; Holloway SM; Amos RA; Royle G
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1150-1162. PubMed ID: 30632173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Towards FLASH proton therapy: the impact of treatment planning and machine characteristics on achievable dose rates.
van de Water S; Safai S; Schippers JM; Weber DC; Lomax AJ
Acta Oncol; 2019 Oct; 58(10):1463-1469. PubMed ID: 31241377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Prioritized efficiency optimization for intensity modulated proton therapy.
Müller BS; Wilkens JJ
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Dec; 61(23):8249-8265. PubMed ID: 27811403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated proton therapy optimization techniques for pediatric craniopharyngiomas: a clinical case study.
Yeung D; McKenzie C; Indelicato DJ
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2014 Jan; 61(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 24000229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Shortening delivery times for intensity-modulated proton therapy by reducing the number of proton spots: an experimental verification.
van de Water S; Belosi MF; Albertini F; Winterhalter C; Weber DC; Lomax AJ
Phys Med Biol; 2020 May; 65(9):095008. PubMed ID: 32155594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incorporating deliverable monitor unit constraints into spot intensity optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy treatment planning.
Cao W; Lim G; Li X; Li Y; Zhu XR; Zhang X
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Aug; 58(15):5113-25. PubMed ID: 23835656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
