BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29149483)

  • 1. Factors influencing the quality of vital sign data in electronic health records: A qualitative study.
    Stevenson JE; Israelsson J; Petersson G; Bath PA
    J Clin Nurs; 2018 Mar; 27(5-6):1276-1286. PubMed ID: 29149483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vital sign documentation in electronic records: The development of workarounds.
    Stevenson JE; Israelsson J; Nilsson G; Petersson G; Bath PA
    Health Informatics J; 2018 Jun; 24(2):206-215. PubMed ID: 27542887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nurses' perceptions of an electronic patient record from a patient safety perspective: a qualitative study.
    Stevenson JE; Nilsson G
    J Adv Nurs; 2012 Mar; 68(3):667-76. PubMed ID: 21781148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recording signs of deterioration in acute patients: The documentation of vital signs within electronic health records in patients who suffered in-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Stevenson JE; Israelsson J; Nilsson GC; Petersson GI; Bath PA
    Health Informatics J; 2016 Mar; 22(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 24782478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examining nursing vital signs documentation workflow: barriers and opportunities in general internal medicine units.
    Yeung MS; Lapinsky SE; Granton JT; Doran DM; Cafazzo JA
    J Clin Nurs; 2012 Apr; 21(7-8):975-82. PubMed ID: 22243491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring Vital Sign Data Quality in Electronic Health Records with Focus on Emergency Care Warning Scores.
    Skyttberg N; Chen R; Blomqvist H; Koch S
    Appl Clin Inform; 2017 Aug; 8(3):880-892. PubMed ID: 28853764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to improve vital sign data quality for use in clinical decision support systems? A qualitative study in nine Swedish emergency departments.
    Skyttberg N; Vicente J; Chen R; Blomqvist H; Koch S
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Jun; 16():61. PubMed ID: 27260476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The nurse response to abnormal vital sign recording in the emergency department.
    Johnson KD; Mueller L; Winkelman C
    J Clin Nurs; 2017 Jan; 26(1-2):148-156. PubMed ID: 27272499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring the frequency of blood pressure documentation in emergency departments.
    Miltner RS; Johnson KD; Deierhoi R
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2014 Mar; 46(2):98-105. PubMed ID: 24355058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving vital sign documentation at triage: an emergency department quality improvement project.
    di Martino P; Leoli F; Cinotti F; Virga A; Gatta L; Kleefield S; Melandri R
    J Patient Saf; 2011 Mar; 7(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 21921864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electronic medical record in the simulation hospital: does it improve accuracy in charting vital signs, intake, and output?
    Mountain C; Redd R; O'Leary-Kelly C; Giles K
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2015 Apr; 33(4):166-71. PubMed ID: 25887108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Engaging staff to improve quality and safety in an austere medical environment: a case-control study in two Sierra Leonean hospitals.
    Rosen MA; Chima AM; Sampson JB; Jackson EV; Koka R; Marx MK; Kamara TB; Ogbuagu OU; Lee BH
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2015 Aug; 27(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 26060230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eliminating errors in vital signs documentation.
    Fieler VK; Jaglowski T; Richards K
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2013 Sep; 31(9):422-7; quiz 428-9. PubMed ID: 24080751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the quality and timeliness of vital signs data using three different data-entry devices.
    Wager KA; Schaffner MJ; Foulois B; Swanson Kazley A; Parker C; Walo H
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2010; 28(4):205-12. PubMed ID: 20571371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vital signs monitoring and nurse-patient interaction: A qualitative observational study of hospital practice.
    Cardona-Morrell M; Prgomet M; Lake R; Nicholson M; Harrison R; Long J; Westbrook J; Braithwaite J; Hillman K
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2016 Apr; 56():9-16. PubMed ID: 26775214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strengths and limitations of the electronic health record for documenting clinical events.
    Carrington JM; Effken JA
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2011 Jun; 29(6):360-7. PubMed ID: 21107239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What is the nursing time and workload involved in taking and recording patients' vital signs? A systematic review.
    Dall'Ora C; Griffiths P; Hope J; Barker H; Smith GB
    J Clin Nurs; 2020 Jul; 29(13-14):2053-2068. PubMed ID: 32017272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nursing assessment of continuous vital sign surveillance to improve patient safety on the medical/surgical unit.
    Watkins T; Whisman L; Booker P
    J Clin Nurs; 2016 Jan; 25(1-2):278-81. PubMed ID: 26531215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A fundamental conflict of care: Nurses' accounts of balancing patients' sleep with taking vital sign observations at night.
    Hope J; Recio-Saucedo A; Fogg C; Griffiths P; Smith GB; Westwood G; Schmidt PE
    J Clin Nurs; 2018 May; 27(9-10):1860-1871. PubMed ID: 29266489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship between nursing documentation and patients' mortality.
    Collins SA; Cato K; Albers D; Scott K; Stetson PD; Bakken S; Vawdrey DK
    Am J Crit Care; 2013 Jul; 22(4):306-13. PubMed ID: 23817819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.