These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29149587)

  • 1. … and the Wisdom to Know the Difference: Scholarly Success From a Wisdom Perspective.
    Glück J
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 12(6):1148-1152. PubMed ID: 29149587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Publication pressure and scientific misconduct: why we need more open governance.
    Gandevia S
    Spinal Cord; 2018 Sep; 56(9):821-822. PubMed ID: 30194444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Scientific Work We Love: A Duplex Theory of Scientific Impact and Its Application to the Top-Cited Articles in the First 30 Years of APS Journals.
    Sternberg RJ
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2018 Mar; 13(2):260-267. PubMed ID: 29592649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scholarly Merit in a Global Context: The Nation Gap in Psychological Science.
    Cheek NN
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 12(6):1133-1137. PubMed ID: 29149576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scientific productivity: An exploratory study of metrics and incentives.
    Lindner MD; Torralba KD; Khan NA
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195321. PubMed ID: 29614101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Making Research Evaluation More Transparent: Aligning Research Philosophy, Institutional Values, and Reporting.
    Dougherty MR; Slevc LR; Grand JA
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2019 May; 14(3):361-375. PubMed ID: 30629888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The data detective. Interview by Ed Yong.
    Simonsohn U
    Nature; 2012 Jul; 487(7405):18-9. PubMed ID: 22763527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Why Traditional Metrics May Not Adequately Represent Ethnic Minority Psychology.
    Syed M
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 12(6):1162-1165. PubMed ID: 29149583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Altmetrics: A new paradigm for scholarly communication.
    Shekhawat KS; Chauhan A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(1):125-126. PubMed ID: 30900670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Love writing.
    Marder E
    Elife; 2019 Mar; 8():. PubMed ID: 30843521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cash-per-publication..
    Nature; 2006 Jun; 441(7095):786. PubMed ID: 16778844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are Twitter and Blogs Important Tools for the Modern Psychological Scientist?
    Weinstein Y; Sumeracki MA
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 12(6):1171-1175. PubMed ID: 29149585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Qualitative interviewing: encountering ethical issues and challenges.
    Clarke A
    Nurse Res; 2006; 13(4):19-29. PubMed ID: 16897938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Putting Culture in the Middle in Judging Scholarly Merit.
    Wang Q
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 12(6):1166-1170. PubMed ID: 29125914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stop ignoring misconduct.
    Kornfeld DS; Titus SL
    Nature; 2016 Sep; 537(7618):29-30. PubMed ID: 27582206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Editorial: Curiosity Versus Criticism in Scientific Publication.
    Maltenfort M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jun; 474(6):1353-5. PubMed ID: 26920570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Afterword: In the Matter of Judging Scientific Merit.
    Sternberg RJ
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 12(6):1179-1185. PubMed ID: 29149578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scholarly reputation.
    Herman E
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2018 Sep; 365(18):. PubMed ID: 30107502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quarrel over book leads to call for misconduct inquiry.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7011):889. PubMed ID: 15496886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Researcher perceptions of ethical guidelines and codes of conduct.
    Giorgini V; Mecca JT; Gibson C; Medeiros K; Mumford MD; Connelly S; Devenport LD
    Account Res; 2015; 22(3):123-38. PubMed ID: 25635845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.