These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29150475)

  • 1. UpToDate adherence to GRADE criteria for strong recommendations: an analytical survey.
    Agoritsas T; Merglen A; Heen AF; Kristiansen A; Neumann I; Brito JP; Brignardello-Petersen R; Alexander PE; Rind DM; Vandvik PO; Guyatt GH
    BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e018593. PubMed ID: 29150475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. World Health Organization strong recommendations based on low-quality evidence (study quality) are frequent and often inconsistent with GRADE guidance.
    Alexander PE; Brito JP; Neumann I; Gionfriddo MR; Bero L; Djulbegovic B; Stoltzfus R; Montori VM; Norris SL; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Apr; 72():98-106. PubMed ID: 25618534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strong recommendations from low certainty evidence: a cross-sectional analysis of a suite of national guidelines.
    Chong MC; Sharp MK; Smith SM; O'Neill M; Ryan M; Lynch R; Mahtani KR; Clyne B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Mar; 23(1):68. PubMed ID: 36966277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A number of factors explain why WHO guideline developers make strong recommendations inconsistent with GRADE guidance.
    Alexander PE; Gionfriddo MR; Li SA; Bero L; Stoltzfus RJ; Neumann I; Brito JP; Djulbegovic B; Montori VM; Norris SL; Schünemann HJ; Thabane L; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():111-22. PubMed ID: 26399903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Senior GRADE methodologists encounter challenges as part of WHO guideline development panels: an inductive content analysis.
    Alexander PE; Li SA; Gionfriddo MR; Stoltzfus RJ; Neumann I; Brito JP; Djulbegovic B; Montori VM; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():123-8. PubMed ID: 26385188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. World Health Organization recommendations are often strong based on low confidence in effect estimates.
    Alexander PE; Bero L; Montori VM; Brito JP; Stoltzfus R; Djulbegovic B; Neumann I; Rave S; Guyatt G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jun; 67(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 24388966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Defining certainty of net benefit: a GRADE concept paper.
    Alper BS; Oettgen P; Kunnamo I; Iorio A; Ansari MT; Murad MH; Meerpohl JJ; Qaseem A; Hultcrantz M; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt G;
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jun; 9(6):e027445. PubMed ID: 31167868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Above the GRADE: Evaluation of Guidelines in Critical Care Medicine.
    Sims CR; Warner MA; Stelfox HT; Hyder JA
    Crit Care Med; 2019 Jan; 47(1):109-113. PubMed ID: 30303840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Moving from evidence to developing recommendations in guidelines: article 11 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
    Schünemann HJ; Oxman AD; Akl EA; Brozek JL; Montori VM; Heffner J; Hill S; Woodhead M; Campos-Outcalt D; Alderson P; Woitalla T; Puhan MA; Falck-Ytter Y; Bousquet J; Guyatt G;
    Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2012 Dec; 9(5):282-92. PubMed ID: 23256172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A guide for health professionals to interpret and use recommendations in guidelines developed with the GRADE approach.
    Neumann I; Santesso N; Akl EA; Rind DM; Vandvik PO; Alonso-Coello P; Agoritsas T; Mustafa RA; Alexander PE; Schünemann H; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Apr; 72():45-55. PubMed ID: 26772609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. American thyroid association guidelines are inconsistent with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations-A meta-epidemiologic study.
    Bautista-Orduno KG; Dorsey-Trevino EG; Gonzalez-Gonzalez JG; Castillo-Gonzalez DA; Garcia-Leal M; Raygoza-Cortez K; Gionfriddo MR; Rodriguez-Gutierrez R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jul; 123():180-188.e2. PubMed ID: 32145366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence to Decision framework provides a structured "roadmap" for making GRADE guidelines recommendations.
    Li SA; Alexander PE; Reljic T; Cuker A; Nieuwlaat R; Wiercioch W; Guyatt G; Schünemann HJ; Djulbegovic B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Dec; 104():103-112. PubMed ID: 30253221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do clinicians want recommendations? A multicenter study comparing evidence summaries with and without GRADE recommendations.
    Neumann I; Alonso-Coello P; Vandvik PO; Agoritsas T; Mas G; Akl EA; Brignardello-Petersen R; Emparanza J; McCullagh L; De Sitio C; McGinn T; Almodaimegh H; Almodaimegh K; Rivera S; Rojas L; Stirnemann J; Irani J; Hlais S; Mustafa R; Bdair F; Aly A; Kristiansen A; Izcovich A; Ramirez A; Brozek J; Guyatt G; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 99():33-40. PubMed ID: 29530644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Responsible, Safe, and Effective Prescription of Opioids for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain: American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) Guidelines.
    Manchikanti L; Kaye AM; Knezevic NN; McAnally H; Slavin K; Trescot AM; Blank S; Pampati V; Abdi S; Grider JS; Kaye AD; Manchikanti KN; Cordner H; Gharibo CG; Harned ME; Albers SL; Atluri S; Aydin SM; Bakshi S; Barkin RL; Benyamin RM; Boswell MV; Buenaventura RM; Calodney AK; Cedeno DL; Datta S; Deer TR; Fellows B; Galan V; Grami V; Hansen H; Helm Ii S; Justiz R; Koyyalagunta D; Malla Y; Navani A; Nouri KH; Pasupuleti R; Sehgal N; Silverman SM; Simopoulos TT; Singh V; Solanki DR; Staats PS; Vallejo R; Wargo BW; Watanabe A; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2017 Feb; 20(2S):S3-S92. PubMed ID: 28226332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations].
    Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Meerpohl JJ; Gartlehner G; Kien C; Langer G; Wipplinger J; Schünemann HJ
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2014; 108(7):413-20. PubMed ID: 25444300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determinants Used to Justify the Strength of Recommendations among Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines.
    Shin ES; Jang JE; Yeon JY; Kim DS; Chang SG; Lee YS
    J Korean Med Sci; 2018 Feb; 33(8):e79. PubMed ID: 29441759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The evolution of GRADE (part 3): A framework built on science or faith?
    Mercuri M; Gafni A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1223-1231. PubMed ID: 30066429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality of evidence is a key determinant for making a strong GRADE guidelines recommendation.
    Djulbegovic B; Kumar A; Kaufman RM; Tobian A; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jul; 68(7):727-32. PubMed ID: 25766057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Endocrine Society guidelines: when the confidence cart goes before the evidence horse.
    Brito JP; Domecq JP; Murad MH; Guyatt GH; Montori VM
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2013 Aug; 98(8):3246-52. PubMed ID: 23783104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions.
    Brozek JL; Akl EA; Alonso-Coello P; Lang D; Jaeschke R; Williams JW; Phillips B; Lelgemann M; Lethaby A; Bousquet J; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ;
    Allergy; 2009 May; 64(5):669-77. PubMed ID: 19210357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.