These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29154562)

  • 21. Predictions and causal estimations are not supported by the same associative structure.
    Vadillo MA; Matute H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):433-47. PubMed ID: 17366310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cue competition in evaluative conditioning as a function of the learning process.
    Kattner F; Green CS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Nov; 162():40-50. PubMed ID: 26458253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Causal judgment from contingency information: relation between subjective reports and individual tendencies in judgment.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Apr; 28(3):415-26. PubMed ID: 10881559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Learning mechanisms underlying accurate and biased contingency judgments.
    Matute H; Blanco F; Díaz-Lago M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(4):373-389. PubMed ID: 31380677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Transfer of absolute and relative predictiveness in human contingency learning.
    Kattner F
    Learn Behav; 2015 Mar; 43(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 25425296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Uncertainty and blocking in human causal learning.
    Jones PM; Zaksaite T; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):111-124. PubMed ID: 30604999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Learning, awareness, and instruction: subjective contingency awareness does matter in the colour-word contingency learning paradigm.
    Schmidt JR; De Houwer J
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Dec; 21(4):1754-68. PubMed ID: 23151459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Augmentation in contingency learning under time pressure.
    Vadillo MA; Matute H
    Br J Psychol; 2010 Aug; 101(Pt 3):579-89. PubMed ID: 19917150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Associative repetition priming as a measure of human contingency learning: evidence of forward and backward blocking.
    Morís J; Cobos PL; Luque D; López FJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 23230993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Contingency learning with evaluative stimuli: testing the generality of contingency learning in a performance paradigm.
    Schmidt JR; De Houwer J
    Exp Psychol; 2012; 59(4):175-82. PubMed ID: 22411181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Time context of cue-outcome associations represented by neurons in perirhinal cortex.
    Eradath MK; Mogami T; Wang G; Tanaka K
    J Neurosci; 2015 Mar; 35(10):4350-65. PubMed ID: 25762680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Interactions between the elements of an outcome in human associative learning.
    Quigley M; Haselgrove M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):297-313. PubMed ID: 32730083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [On the validity of applying associative learning model to the acquisition process of human contingency judgment].
    Shimazaki T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1999 Dec; 70(5):409-16. PubMed ID: 10756589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Outcome and cue properties modulate blocking.
    De Houwer J; Beckers T; Glautier S
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jul; 55(3):965-85. PubMed ID: 12188522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory.
    Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):626-48. PubMed ID: 18999357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Two mechanisms of human contingency learning.
    Sternberg DA; McClelland JL
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Jan; 23(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 22198929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Associative relationships in human predictive learning.
    Gámez AM; Martos R; Abad MJ; Rosas JM
    Span J Psychol; 2013; 16():E5. PubMed ID: 23866246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Strategy selection in cue-based decision making.
    Bryant DJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2014 Jun; 68(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 24884389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Previously acquired cue-outcome structural knowledge guides new learning: Evidence from the retroactive-interference-between-cues effect.
    Luque D; Morís J; López FJ; Cobos PL
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Aug; 45(6):916-931. PubMed ID: 28405958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Outcome maximality and additivity training also influence cue competition in causal learning when learning involves many cues and events.
    Vandorpe S; De Houwer J; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):356-68. PubMed ID: 17366305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.