These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29154623)

  • 1. Cognitive control over prospective task-set interference.
    Whitehead PS; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 May; 44(5):741-755. PubMed ID: 29154623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency of prospective use modulates instructed task-set interference.
    Whitehead PS; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1970-1980. PubMed ID: 30265022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Executive and perceptual distraction in visual working memory.
    Allen RJ; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1677-1693. PubMed ID: 28414499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of working memory contents and perceptual load on distractor processing: When a response-related distractor is held in working memory.
    Koshino H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jan; 172():19-25. PubMed ID: 27838400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When shorter delays lead to worse memories: Task disruption makes visual working memory temporarily vulnerable to test interference.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J; Olivers CNL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):722-733. PubMed ID: 29094991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Practice-related optimization of dual-task performance: Efficient task instantiation during overlapping task processing.
    Schubert T; Strobach T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1884-1904. PubMed ID: 30335413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of action coordination for prospective memory: Task-interruption demands affect intention realization.
    Rummel J; Wesslein AK; Meiser T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):717-735. PubMed ID: 27736115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distinct effects of trial-driven and task Set-related control in primary visual cortex.
    Griffis JC; Elkhetali AS; Vaden RJ; Visscher KM
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():285-297. PubMed ID: 26163806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Task sets serve as boundaries for the congruency sequence effect.
    Grant LD; Cookson SL; Weissman DH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Aug; 46(8):798-812. PubMed ID: 32324028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time limits during visual foraging reveal flexible working memory templates.
    Kristjánsson T; Thornton IM; Kristjánsson Á
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jun; 44(6):827-835. PubMed ID: 29809049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Memory-driven attentional capture reveals the waxing and waning of working memory activation due to dual-task interference.
    Sasin E; Nieuwenstein M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1891-1897. PubMed ID: 27125221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Working memory's workload capacity.
    Heathcote A; Coleman JR; Eidels A; Watson JM; Houpt J; Strayer DL
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Oct; 43(7):973-89. PubMed ID: 25962602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Set-shifting and place-keeping as separable control processes.
    Cooper RP; Byde C; de Cecilio R; Fulks C; Morais DS
    Cogn Psychol; 2018 Sep; 105():53-80. PubMed ID: 30032062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic adjustments in working memory in the face of affective interference.
    Witkin JE; Zanesco AP; Denkova E; Jha AP
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jan; 48(1):16-31. PubMed ID: 31385241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Don't stop me now: Hampered retrieval of action plans following interruptions.
    Zickerick B; Kobald SO; Thönes S; Küper K; Wascher E; Schneider D
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Feb; 58(2):e13725. PubMed ID: 33226663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cross-modal information transfer and the effect of concurrent task-load.
    Bahrami Balani A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jan; 46(1):104-116. PubMed ID: 31021115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective memory and working memory in comparison. New experimental paradigms.
    Fronda G; Monti C; Sozzi M; Corbo M; Balconi M
    Int J Neurosci; 2020 Aug; 130(8):834-840. PubMed ID: 31858863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frozen in time: Concurrent task performance interferes with temporal shifts of attention.
    Visser TAW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jun; 43(6):1057-1064. PubMed ID: 28263628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dual-task costs in working memory: An adversarial collaboration.
    Doherty JM; Belletier C; Rhodes S; Jaroslawska A; Barrouillet P; Camos V; Cowan N; Naveh-Benjamin M; Logie RH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1529-1551. PubMed ID: 30407025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prefrontal Hemodynamics of Physical Activity and Environmental Complexity During Cognitive Work.
    McKendrick R; Mehta R; Ayaz H; Scheldrup M; Parasuraman R
    Hum Factors; 2017 Feb; 59(1):147-162. PubMed ID: 28146680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.