These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 291551)

  • 1. Determination of radiation geometry and radiation doses during radiography with an intraoral x-ray tube (Philips Stat ORALIX).
    Blomgren PG; Hollender L; Molander B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1978; 7(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 291551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Absorbed dose determination for tomographic implant site assessment techniques.
    Kassebaum DK; Stoller NE; McDavid WD; Goshorn B; Ahrens CR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Apr; 73(4):502-9. PubMed ID: 1574314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Paediatric absorbed doses from rotational panoramic radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Kobayashi N; Kuroyanagi K; Nishizawa K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 11571549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit.
    Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 13679353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiation exposure to critical structures during transfacial and transcranial TMJ radiography.
    Shorten DL; Farman AG; George DI; Sharma S; Wilson D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1985; 14(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 3869569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between panoramic radiographic techniques. Part III: Radiation absorbed doses with Status-X, Orthopantomograph Model OP5, and Paneléte.
    Stenstrom B; Julin P; Richter S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1982; 11(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 6962151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Absorbed organ and effective doses from digital intra-oral and panoramic radiography applying the ICRP 103 recommendations for effective dose estimations.
    Granlund C; Thilander-Klang A; Ylhan B; Lofthag-Hansen S; Ekestubbe A
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20151052. PubMed ID: 27452261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Doses in eye lens, thyroid, salivary glands, mammary glands, and gonads, due to radiation scattered in dental orthopantomography.
    Campillo-Rivera GE; Vázquez-Bañuelos J; García-Duran Á; Escalona-Llaguno MI; Arteaga MV; Vega-Carrillo HR
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2019 Apr; 146():57-60. PubMed ID: 30753985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exposure distribution, absorbed doses, and energy imparted for panoramic radiography using Orthopantomograph model OP 5.
    Nilsson L; Rohlin M; Thapper K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 Feb; 59(2):212-9. PubMed ID: 3856810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Absorbed doses at varying tube voltage in lateral cephalography.
    Eliasson S; Julin P; Philip A; Stenström B
    Swed Dent J; 1985; 9(3):117-27. PubMed ID: 3860993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thyroid dose distribution in dental radiography.
    Bristow RG; Wood RE; Clark GM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Oct; 68(4):482-7. PubMed ID: 2797745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view.
    Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiobiologic risk estimation from dental radiology. Part I. Absorbed doses to critical organs.
    Underhill TE; Chilvarquer I; Kimura K; Langlais RP; McDavid WD; Preece JW; Barnwell G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Jul; 66(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 3165508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Absorbed doses from intraoral radiography with special emphasis on collimator dimensions.
    Stenström B; Henrikson CO; Holm B; Richter S
    Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(1-2):59-71. PubMed ID: 3458320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: Patient exposure.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Debaveye D; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 15897284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The reduction of dose in paediatric panoramic radiography: the impact of collimator height and programme selection.
    Davis AT; Safi H; Maddison SM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(2):20140223. PubMed ID: 25352427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Determination of radiation doses on the teeth exposed during dental and other general purpose X-ray examinations].
    Luo WF
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1989 Sep; 24(5):306-8. PubMed ID: 2517938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part II: Occupational exposure.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Debaveye D; Bogaerts R; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 15897285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Dose measurements comparing conventional and digital panoramic radiography].
    Visser H; Hermann KP; Bredemeier S; Köhler B
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2000 Jul; 4(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 10994319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Personal thermoluminescent dosimetry for determining the radiation dosage in children and adolescents in status X panoramic radiography in dental roentgen diagnosis].
    Wiltschke F; Taschner P; Edelmann BU; Schmidt W; Schönberger A
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1981; 22(2):224-30. PubMed ID: 7255694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.