309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29156079)
1. The GARD platform for potency assessment of skin sensitizing chemicals.
Zeller KS; Forreryd A; Lindberg T; Gradin R; Chawade A; Lindstedt M
ALTEX; 2017; 34(4):539-559. PubMed ID: 29156079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genomic allergen rapid detection in-house validation--a proof of concept.
Johansson H; Rydnert F; Kühnl J; Schepky A; Borrebaeck C; Lindstedt M
Toxicol Sci; 2014 Jun; 139(2):362-70. PubMed ID: 24675087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the GARD assay in a blind Cosmetics Europe study.
Johansson H; Gradin R; Forreryd A; Agemark M; Zeller K; Johansson A; Larne O; van Vliet E; Borrebaeck C; Lindstedt M
ALTEX; 2017; 34(4):515-523. PubMed ID: 28214915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of skin sensitization potency using machine learning approaches.
Zang Q; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Bell S; Kleinstreuer N; Allen D; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Casey W; Strickland J
J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Jul; 37(7):792-805. PubMed ID: 28074598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. From genome-wide arrays to tailor-made biomarker readout - Progress towards routine analysis of skin sensitizing chemicals with GARD.
Forreryd A; Zeller KS; Lindberg T; Johansson H; Lindstedt M
Toxicol In Vitro; 2016 Dec; 37():178-188. PubMed ID: 27638055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The GARD assay for assessment of chemical skin sensitizers.
Johansson H; Albrekt AS; Borrebaeck CA; Lindstedt M
Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Apr; 27(3):1163-9. PubMed ID: 23032079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of chemical respiratory sensitizers using GARD, a novel in vitro assay based on a genomic biomarker signature.
Forreryd A; Johansson H; Albrekt AS; Borrebaeck CA; Lindstedt M
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0118808. PubMed ID: 25760038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of high throughput gene expression platforms using a genomic biomarker signature for prediction of skin sensitization.
Forreryd A; Johansson H; Albrekt AS; Lindstedt M
BMC Genomics; 2014 May; 15(1):379. PubMed ID: 24886304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting skin sensitizers with confidence - Using conformal prediction to determine applicability domain of GARD.
Forreryd A; Norinder U; Lindberg T; Lindstedt M
Toxicol In Vitro; 2018 Apr; 48():179-187. PubMed ID: 29374571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The GARDpotency Assay for Potency-Associated Subclassification of Chemical Skin Sensitizers-Rationale, Method Development, and Ring Trial Results of Predictive Performance and Reproducibility.
Gradin R; Johansson A; Forreryd A; Aaltonen E; Jerre A; Larne O; Mattson U; Johansson H
Toxicol Sci; 2020 Aug; 176(2):423-432. PubMed ID: 32421796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Putting the parts together: combining in vitro methods to test for skin sensitizing potentials.
Bauch C; Kolle SN; Ramirez T; Eltze T; Fabian E; Mehling A; Teubner W; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Aug; 63(3):489-504. PubMed ID: 22659254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Skin sensitizers differentially regulate signaling pathways in MUTZ-3 cells in relation to their individual potency.
Albrekt AS; Johansson H; Börje A; Borrebaeck C; Lindstedt M
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol; 2014 Feb; 15():5. PubMed ID: 24517095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-enzymatic glutathione reactivity and in vitro toxicity: a non-animal approach to skin sensitization.
Aptula AO; Patlewicz G; Roberts DW; Schultz TW
Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Mar; 20(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 16112535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lymphocyte surface markers and cytokines are suitable for detection and potency assessment of skin-sensitizing chemicals in an in vitro model of allergic contact dermatitis: the LCSA-ly.
Frombach J; Sonnenburg A; Krapohl BD; Zuberbier T; Peiser M; Stahlmann R; Schreiner M
Arch Toxicol; 2018 Apr; 92(4):1495-1505. PubMed ID: 29380012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Skin Sensitization Tests: The LLNA and the RhE IL-18 Potency Assay.
Corsini E; Gibbs S; Roggen E; Kimber I; Basketter DA
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2240():13-29. PubMed ID: 33423223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An in vitro method for detecting chemical sensitization using human reconstructed skin models and its applicability to cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and medical device safety testing.
McKim JM; Keller DJ; Gorski JR
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2012 Dec; 31(4):292-305. PubMed ID: 22494060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-animal assessment of skin sensitization hazard: Is an integrated testing strategy needed, and if so what should be integrated?
Roberts DW; Patlewicz G
J Appl Toxicol; 2018 Jan; 38(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 28543848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A fluorescence high throughput screening method for the detection of reactive electrophiles as potential skin sensitizers.
Avonto C; Chittiboyina AG; Rua D; Khan IA
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2015 Dec; 289(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 26455772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intralaboratory validation of four in vitro assays for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals.
Bauch C; Kolle SN; Fabian E; Pachel C; Ramirez T; Wiench B; Wruck CJ; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Sep; 25(6):1162-8. PubMed ID: 21669280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An epidermal equivalent assay for identification and ranking potency of contact sensitizers.
Gibbs S; Corsini E; Spiekstra SW; Galbiati V; Fuchs HW; Degeorge G; Troese M; Hayden P; Deng W; Roggen E
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2013 Oct; 272(2):529-41. PubMed ID: 23876969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
