These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29156300)

  • 1. Attenuation estimation by repeatedly solving the forward scattering problem.
    Ilyina N; Hermans J; Verboven E; Van Den Abeele K; D'Agostino E; D'hooge J
    Ultrasonics; 2018 Mar; 84():201-209. PubMed ID: 29156300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hybrid spectral domain method for attenuation slope estimation.
    Kim H; Varghese T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1808-19. PubMed ID: 18621468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attenuation estimation using spectral cross-correlation.
    Kim H; Varghese T
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2007 Mar; 54(3):510-9. PubMed ID: 17375820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Signal to noise ratio comparisons for ultrasound attenuation slope estimation algorithms.
    Omari EA; Varghese T
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):032902. PubMed ID: 24593741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simultaneous estimation of cortical bone thickness and acoustic wave velocity using a multivariable optimization approach: Bone phantom and in-vitro study.
    Tasinkevych Y; Podhajecki J; FaliƄska K; Litniewski J
    Ultrasonics; 2016 Feb; 65():105-12. PubMed ID: 26522955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the impact of backscatter intensity variations on ultrasound attenuation estimation.
    Omari EA; Varghese T; Madsen EL; Frank G
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082904. PubMed ID: 23927359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel power spectrum calculation method using phase-compensation and weighted averaging for the estimation of ultrasound attenuation.
    Heo SW; Kim H
    Ultrasonics; 2010 May; 50(6):592-9. PubMed ID: 20083291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Backscatter-contour-attenuation joint estimation model for attenuation compensation in ultrasound imagery.
    Yu Y; Wang J
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2010 Oct; 19(10):2725-36. PubMed ID: 20483684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatially Variant Ultrasound Attenuation Mapping Using a Regularized Linear Least-Squares Approach.
    Birdi J; D'hooge J; Bertrand A
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2022 May; 69(5):1596-1609. PubMed ID: 35263252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scatterer number density considerations in reference phantom-based attenuation estimation.
    Rubert N; Varghese T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1680-96. PubMed ID: 24726800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved parametric imaging of scatterer size estimates using angular compounding.
    Gerig AL; Varghese T; Zagzebski JA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Jun; 51(6):708-15. PubMed ID: 15244284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasonic attenuation estimation in small plaque samples using a power difference method.
    Shi H; Tu H; Dempsey RJ; Varghese T
    Ultrason Imaging; 2007 Jan; 29(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 17491296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrasound compounding with automatic attenuation compensation using paired angle scans.
    Treece GM; Gee AH; Prager RW
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 33(4):630-42. PubMed ID: 17320269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of Tissue Attenuation from Ultrasonic B-Mode Images-Spectral-Log-Difference and Method-of-Moments Algorithms Compared.
    Brandner DM; Cai X; Foiret J; Ferrara KW; Zagar BG
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(7):. PubMed ID: 33916496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Theoretical and phantom based investigation of the impact of sound speed and backscatter variations on attenuation slope estimation.
    Omari E; Lee H; Varghese T
    Ultrasonics; 2011 Aug; 51(6):758-67. PubMed ID: 21477832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Golay improvement of the robustness of mean scatterer spacing measurement with ultrasonic backscattering.
    Pan W; Shen Y; Liu T; Wang Y
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S455-65. PubMed ID: 26406037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the spectral fit algorithm as functions of frequency range and deltakaeff.
    Bigelow TA; O'Brien WD
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2005 Nov; 52(11):2003-10. PubMed ID: 16422412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lower Bound on Estimation Variance of the Ultrasonic Attenuation Coefficient Using the Spectral-Difference Reference-phantom Method.
    Samimi K; Varghese T
    Ultrason Imaging; 2017 May; 39(3):151-171. PubMed ID: 28425388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New microembolus size estimator for peripheral blood vessels.
    Zmigrodzki J; Kaluzynski K
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Mar; 38(3):454-67. PubMed ID: 22305059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robust estimation of ultrasound pulses using outlier-resistant de-noising.
    Michailovich O; Adam D
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Mar; 22(3):368-81. PubMed ID: 12760554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.