These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29157026)

  • 1. First experiences with a tool to measure the level of clinical information present in adverse drug reaction reports.
    Oosterhuis I; Rolfes L; Ekhart C; Muller-Hansma A; Härmark L
    Expert Opin Drug Saf; 2018 Feb; 17(2):111-115. PubMed ID: 29157026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A tailor-made approach for causality assessment for ADR reports on drugs and vaccines.
    Oosterhuis I; Zweers P; Rümke H; Muller-Hansma A; van Puijenbroek EP
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2019 Apr; 28(4):544-550. PubMed ID: 30168222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of completeness of suspected adverse drug reaction reports submitted to the mexican national pharmacovigilance centre: a cross-sectional period-prevalence study.
    Sánchez-Sánchez B; Altagracia-Martínez M; Kravzov-Jinich J; Moreno-Bonett C; Vázquez-Moreno E; Martínez-Núñez JM
    Drug Saf; 2012 Oct; 35(10):837-44. PubMed ID: 22924896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Completeness of Spontaneous Adverse Drug Reaction Reports Sent by General Practitioners to a Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre: A Descriptive Study.
    Durrieu G; Jacquot J; Mège M; Bondon-Guitton E; Rousseau V; Montastruc F; Montastruc JL
    Drug Saf; 2016 Dec; 39(12):1189-1195. PubMed ID: 27688025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The adverse drug reaction reporting assignment for specialist oncology nurses: a preliminary evaluation of quality, relevance and educational value in a prospective cohort study.
    Schutte T; van Eekeren R; Richir M; van Staveren J; van Puijenbroek E; Tichelaar J; van Agtmael M
    Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol; 2018 Jan; 391(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 29063137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An observational study to compare the contents and quality of information furnished in CDSCO ADR reporting form, yellow card, medwatch and blue form by the healthcare professionals.
    Rehan HS; Chopra D; Holani SN; Mishra R
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2014; 26(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 24796346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Completeness of pharmacovigilance reporting in general medicine in France.].
    Humbert X; Jacquot J; Alexandre J; Sassier M; Robin N; Pageot C; Kheloufi F; Joyau C; Coquerel A; Durrieu G; Fedrizzi S
    Sante Publique; 2019; Vol. 31(4):561-566. PubMed ID: 31959257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The quality of spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports from the pharmacovigilance centre in western China.
    Niu R; Xiang Y; Wu T; Zhang Z; Chen Y; Feng B
    Expert Opin Drug Saf; 2019 Jan; 18(1):51-58. PubMed ID: 30574811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Completeness of published case reports on suspected adverse drug reactions: evaluation of 100 reports from a company safety database.
    Impicciatore P; Mucci M
    Drug Saf; 2010 Sep; 33(9):765-73. PubMed ID: 20701409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhancing Pediatric Adverse Drug Reaction Documentation in the Electronic Medical Record.
    Tillman EM; Suppes SL; Feldman K; Goldman JL
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2021 Feb; 61(2):181-186. PubMed ID: 32776356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of patient reporting of adverse drug reactions to the UK 'Yellow Card Scheme': literature review, descriptive and qualitative analyses, and questionnaire surveys.
    Avery AJ; Anderson C; Bond CM; Fortnum H; Gifford A; Hannaford PC; Hazell L; Krska J; Lee AJ; McLernon DJ; Murphy E; Shakir S; Watson MC
    Health Technol Assess; 2011 May; 15(20):1-234, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 21545758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Quality of Clinical Information in Adverse Drug Reaction Reports by Patients and Healthcare Professionals: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis.
    Rolfes L; van Hunsel F; van der Linden L; Taxis K; van Puijenbroek E
    Drug Saf; 2017 Jul; 40(7):607-614. PubMed ID: 28405899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Online reporting of adverse drug reactions: a study from a French regional pharmacovigilance center.
    Abadie D; Chebane L; Bert M; Durrieu G; Montastruc JL
    Therapie; 2014; 69(5):395-400. PubMed ID: 25269141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Principle of adverse drug reaction causality judgement and interpretation of causality assessment method both in China and abroad].
    Wei X; Xie YM
    Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi; 2012 Sep; 37(18):2744-7. PubMed ID: 23285925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lack of essential information in spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions in Catalonia-a restraint to the potentiality for signal detection.
    Plessis L; Gómez A; García N; Cereza G; Figueras A
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2017 Jun; 73(6):751-758. PubMed ID: 28251276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of a changed legislation on reporting of adverse drug reactions in Sweden, with focus on nurses' reporting.
    Karlsson SA; Jacobsson I; Boman MD; Hakkarainen KM; Lövborg H; Hägg S; Jönsson AK
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2015 May; 71(5):631-6. PubMed ID: 25845655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Timeline representation of clinical data: usability and added value for pharmacovigilance.
    Ledieu T; Bouzillé G; Thiessard F; Berquet K; Van Hille P; Renault E; Polard E; Cuggia M
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2018 Oct; 18(1):86. PubMed ID: 30340483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a quality instrument for assessing the spontaneous reports of ADR/ADE using Delphi method in China.
    Chen L; Jiang L; Shen A; Wei W
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2016 Sep; 72(9):1135-42. PubMed ID: 27312197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of adverse drug reactions through the minimum basic data set.
    Salmerón-García A; Cabeza Barrera J; Vergara Pavón MJ; Román Márquez E; Cortés de Miguel S; Vallejo-Rodríguez I; Raya García S; Casado Fernández E
    Pharm World Sci; 2010 Jun; 32(3):322-8. PubMed ID: 20213432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of three methods (an updated logistic probabilistic method, the Naranjo and Liverpool algorithms) for the evaluation of routine pharmacovigilance case reports using consensual expert judgement as reference.
    Théophile H; André M; Miremont-Salamé G; Arimone Y; Bégaud B
    Drug Saf; 2013 Oct; 36(10):1033-44. PubMed ID: 23828659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.