534 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29157448)
1. Ab-initio conformational epitope structure prediction using genetic algorithm and SVM for vaccine design.
Moghram BA; Nabil E; Badr A
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jan; 153():161-170. PubMed ID: 29157448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and validation of an epitope prediction tool for swine (PigMatrix) based on the pocket profile method.
Gutiérrez AH; Martin WD; Bailey-Kellogg C; Terry F; Moise L; De Groot AS
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 16():290. PubMed ID: 26370412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of MHC-II peptide binding prediction servers: applications for vaccine research.
Lin HH; Zhang GL; Tongchusak S; Reinherz EL; Brusic V
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 9 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S22. PubMed ID: 19091022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accurate prediction of major histocompatibility complex class II epitopes by sparse representation via ℓ 1-minimization.
Aguilar-Bonavides C; Sanchez-Arias R; Lanzas C
BioData Min; 2014; 7():23. PubMed ID: 25392716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accurate prediction of immunogenic T-cell epitopes from epitope sequences using the genetic algorithm-based ensemble learning.
Zhang W; Niu Y; Zou H; Luo L; Liu Q; Wu W
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0128194. PubMed ID: 26020952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Toward the prediction of class I and II mouse major histocompatibility complex-peptide-binding affinity: in silico bioinformatic step-by-step guide using quantitative structure-activity relationships.
Hattotuwagama CK; Doytchinova IA; Flower DR
Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 409():227-45. PubMed ID: 18450004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Towards universal structure-based prediction of class II MHC epitopes for diverse allotypes.
Bordner AJ
PLoS One; 2010 Dec; 5(12):e14383. PubMed ID: 21187956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of MHC class II binding affinity using SMM-align, a novel stabilization matrix alignment method.
Nielsen M; Lundegaard C; Lund O
BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 8():238. PubMed ID: 17608956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematically benchmarking peptide-MHC binding predictors: From synthetic to naturally processed epitopes.
Zhao W; Sher X
PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Nov; 14(11):e1006457. PubMed ID: 30408041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Introducing of an integrated artificial neural network and Chou's pseudo amino acid composition approach for computational epitope-mapping of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus antigens.
Nosrati M; Mohabatkar H; Behbahani M
Int Immunopharmacol; 2020 Jan; 78():106020. PubMed ID: 31776090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Structure-based prediction of MHC-peptide association: algorithm comparison and application to cancer vaccine design.
Schiewe AJ; Haworth IS
J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Oct; 26(3):667-75. PubMed ID: 17493854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel in silico minigene vaccine based on CD4
Pourseif MM; Moghaddam G; Naghili B; Saeedi N; Parvizpour S; Nematollahi A; Omidi Y
Comput Biol Chem; 2018 Feb; 72():150-163. PubMed ID: 29195784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. SVM and SVR-based MHC-binding prediction using a mathematical presentation of peptide sequences.
Jandrlić DR
Comput Biol Chem; 2016 Dec; 65():117-127. PubMed ID: 27816828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benchmarking predictions of MHC class I restricted T cell epitopes in a comprehensively studied model system.
Paul S; Croft NP; Purcell AW; Tscharke DC; Sette A; Nielsen M; Peters B
PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 May; 16(5):e1007757. PubMed ID: 32453790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. INeo-Epp: A Novel T-Cell HLA Class-I Immunogenicity or Neoantigenic Epitope Prediction Method Based on Sequence-Related Amino Acid Features.
Wang G; Wan H; Jian X; Li Y; Ouyang J; Tan X; Zhao Y; Lin Y; Xie L
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():5798356. PubMed ID: 32626747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. POPI: predicting immunogenicity of MHC class I binding peptides by mining informative physicochemical properties.
Tung CW; Ho SY
Bioinformatics; 2007 Apr; 23(8):942-9. PubMed ID: 17384427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved prediction of MHC class I and class II epitopes using a novel Gibbs sampling approach.
Nielsen M; Lundegaard C; Worning P; Hvid CS; Lamberth K; Buus S; Brunak S; Lund O
Bioinformatics; 2004 Jun; 20(9):1388-97. PubMed ID: 14962912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SEPIa, a knowledge-driven algorithm for predicting conformational B-cell epitopes from the amino acid sequence.
Dalkas GA; Rooman M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 18(1):95. PubMed ID: 28183272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of human major histocompatibility complex class II binding peptides by continuous kernel discrimination method.
He J; Yang G; Rao H; Li Z; Ding X; Chen Y
Artif Intell Med; 2012 Jun; 55(2):107-15. PubMed ID: 22134095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. TEPITOPEpan: extending TEPITOPE for peptide binding prediction covering over 700 HLA-DR molecules.
Zhang L; Chen Y; Wong HS; Zhou S; Mamitsuka H; Zhu S
PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e30483. PubMed ID: 22383964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
