471 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29157459)
21. Performance of machine learning software to classify breast lesions using BI-RADS radiomic features on ultrasound images.
Fleury E; Marcomini K
Eur Radiol Exp; 2019 Aug; 3(1):34. PubMed ID: 31385114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of rate of development and rate of change for benign and malignant breast calcifications at the lumpectomy bed.
Giess CS; Keating DM; Osborne MP; Mester J; Rosenblatt R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Sep; 175(3):789-93. PubMed ID: 10954468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of the effect of computer aided diagnosis system on breast ultrasound for inexperienced radiologists in describing and determining breast lesions.
Lee J; Kim S; Kang BJ; Kim SH; Park GE
Med Ultrason; 2019 Aug; 21(3):239-245. PubMed ID: 31476202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Clinical value of computer-assisted analysis in MR mammography. A comparison between two systems and three observers with different levels of experience].
Renz DM; Baltzer PA; Kullnig PE; Böttcher J; Vag T; Gajda M; Camara O; Runnebaum IB; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2008 Nov; 180(11):968-76. PubMed ID: 18855300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Risk of malignancy in palpable solid breast masses considered probably benign or low suspicion: implications for management.
Giess CS; Smeglin LZ; Meyer JE; Ritner JA; Birdwell RL
J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Dec; 31(12):1943-9. PubMed ID: 23197547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Computer-aided diagnosis based on quantitative elastographic features with supersonic shear wave imaging.
Xiao Y; Zeng J; Niu L; Zeng Q; Wu T; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 24268454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Probably Benign Breast Nodular Lesions (BI-RADS 3): Correlation between Ultrasound Features and Histologic Findings.
Pistolese CA; Tosti D; Citraro D; Ricci F; Di Stefano C; Lamacchia F; Ferrari D; Floris R
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 45(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 30340921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection Software for Automated Breast Ultrasound.
Kwon MR; Youn I; Lee MY; Lee HA
Acad Radiol; 2024 Feb; 31(2):480-491. PubMed ID: 37813703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of small breast lesions.
Du YR; Wu Y; Chen M; Gu XG
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2018; 70(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 29710688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Differential Diagnosis of Breast Category 3 and 4 Nodules Through BI-RADS Classification in Conjunction with Shear Wave Elastography.
Wang M; Yang Z; Liu C; Yan J; Zhang W; Sun J; Cui G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 43(3):601-606. PubMed ID: 27988221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A Pivotal Study of Optoacoustic Imaging to Diagnose Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A New Evaluation Tool for Radiologists.
Neuschler EI; Butler R; Young CA; Barke LD; Bertrand ML; Böhm-Vélez M; Destounis S; Donlan P; Grobmyer SR; Katzen J; Kist KA; Lavin PT; Makariou EV; Parris TM; Schilling KJ; Tucker FL; Dogan BE
Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):398-412. PubMed ID: 29178816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Quantitative Non-Gaussian Diffusion MR Imaging: Evaluation of the Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Several Markers of Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions.
Iima M; Kataoka M; Kanao S; Onishi N; Kawai M; Ohashi A; Sakaguchi R; Toi M; Togashi K
Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):432-441. PubMed ID: 29095673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Stratification of mammographic computerized analysis by BI-RADS categories.
Lederman R; Leichter I; Buchbinder S; Novak B; Bamberger P; Fields S
Eur Radiol; 2003 Feb; 13(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 12599001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Intensity-Invariant Texture Analysis for Classification of BI-RADS Category 3 Breast Masses.
Lo CM; Moon WK; Huang CS; Chen JH; Yang MC; Chang RF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 41(7):2039-48. PubMed ID: 25843514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Ultrasound Using Computerized BI-RADS Features and Machine Learning Methods.
Shan J; Alam SK; Garra B; Zhang Y; Ahmed T
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Apr; 42(4):980-8. PubMed ID: 26806441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Can strain elastography combined with ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system be a more effective method in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions?
Arslan S; Uslu N; Ozturk FU; Akcay EY; Tezcaner T; Agildere AM
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2017 Oct; 44(4):289-296. PubMed ID: 28154989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Ultrasound Elastography Combined With BI-RADS-US Classification System: Is It Helpful for the Diagnostic Performance of Conventional Ultrasonography?
Hao SY; Jiang QC; Zhong WJ; Zhao XB; Yao JY; Li LJ; Luo BM; Ou B; Zhi H
Clin Breast Cancer; 2016 Jun; 16(3):e33-41. PubMed ID: 26639065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A case-oriented web-based training system for breast cancer diagnosis.
Huang Q; Huang X; Liu L; Lin Y; Long X; Li X
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 156():73-83. PubMed ID: 29428078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Performance of users in tropical areas with the BI-RADS classification of breast lesions for predicting malignancy].
Gonsu Kamga JE; Moifo B; Sando Z; Guegang Goudjou E; Nko'o Amvene S; Gonsu Fotsin J
Med Sante Trop; 2013; 23(4):439-44. PubMed ID: 24334372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
